182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25293677)
1. The biomechanical performance of a new forked knotless biceps tenodesis compared to a knotless and suture anchor tenodesis.
Lorbach O; Trennheuser C; Kohn D; Anagnostakos K
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Jul; 24(7):2174-80. PubMed ID: 25293677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cyclic biomechanical testing of biocomposite lateral row knotless anchors in a human cadaveric model.
Barber FA; Bava ED; Spenciner DB; Piccirillo J
Arthroscopy; 2013 Jun; 29(6):1012-8. PubMed ID: 23578366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical evaluation of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: dual suture anchor versus interference screw fixation.
Tashjian RZ; Henninger HB
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Oct; 22(10):1408-12. PubMed ID: 23415819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using Interconnected Knotless Anchor for Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis Could Offer Improved Biomechanical Properties in a Cadaveric Model.
Kuan FC; Hsu KL; Yen JZ; Wen MJ; Yeh ML; Chen Y; Su WR
Arthroscopy; 2020 Aug; 36(8):2047-2054. PubMed ID: 32259645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Suprapectoral or subpectoral position for biceps tenodesis: biomechanical comparison of four different techniques in both positions.
Patzer T; Santo G; Olender GD; Wellmann M; Hurschler C; Schofer MD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2012 Jan; 21(1):116-25. PubMed ID: 21493102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical Comparison of All-Suture Anchor Fixation and Interference Screw Technique for Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis.
Chiang FL; Hong CK; Chang CH; Lin CL; Jou IM; Su WR
Arthroscopy; 2016 Jul; 32(7):1247-52. PubMed ID: 27039966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical Analysis of All-Suture Suture Anchor Fixation Compared With Conventional Suture Anchors and Interference Screws for Biceps Tenodesis.
Frank RM; Bernardoni ED; Veera SS; Waterman BR; Griffin JW; Shewman EF; Cole BJ; Romeo AA; Verma NN
Arthroscopy; 2019 Jun; 35(6):1760-1768. PubMed ID: 31072716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The failure mode of two reabsorbable fixation systems: Swivelock with Fibertape versus Bio-Corkscrew with Fiberwire in bovine rotator cuff.
De Carli A; Lanzetti RM; Monaco E; Labianca L; Mossa L; Ferretti A
J Orthop Sci; 2012 Nov; 17(6):789-95. PubMed ID: 22918616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical properties of suprapectoral biceps tenodesis with double-anchor knotless luggage tag sutures vs. subpectoral biceps tenodesis with single-anchor whipstitch suture using all-suture anchors.
Nicolay RW; Jahandar A; Retzky JS; Kontaxis A; Verma NN; Fu MC
JSES Int; 2023 Nov; 7(6):2393-2399. PubMed ID: 37969507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical Evaluation of a Transtendinous All-Suture Anchor Technique Versus Interference Screw Technique for Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis in a Cadaveric Model.
Hong CK; Hsu KL; Kuan FC; Lin CL; Yeh ML; Su WR
Arthroscopy; 2018 Jun; 34(6):1755-1761. PubMed ID: 29482858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Arthroscopic extra-articular suprapectoral biceps tenodesis with knotless suture anchor.
Kongmalai P
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2019 Feb; 29(2):493-497. PubMed ID: 30145670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interference screw versus suture anchor fixation for subpectoral tenodesis of the proximal biceps tendon: a cadaveric study.
Golish SR; Caldwell PE; Miller MD; Singanamala N; Ranawat AS; Treme G; Pearson SE; Costic R; Sekiya JK
Arthroscopy; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1103-8. PubMed ID: 19028161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. All-suture anchor size and drill angle influence load to failure in a porcine model of subpectoral biceps tenodesis, a biomechanical study.
Alt PS; Marx C; Braun S
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 May; 25(1):408. PubMed ID: 38783272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical Comparison of Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Onlay Techniques.
Lacheta L; Rosenberg SI; Brady AW; Dornan GJ; Millett PJ
Orthop J Sports Med; 2019 Oct; 7(10):2325967119876276. PubMed ID: 31663008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical evaluation of open suture anchor fixation versus interference screw for biceps tenodesis.
Papp DF; Skelley NW; Sutter EG; Ji JH; Wierks CH; Belkoff SM; McFarland EG
Orthopedics; 2011 Jul; 34(7):e275-8. PubMed ID: 21717988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical comparison of a knotless suture anchor with standard suture anchor in the repair of type II SLAP tears.
Sileo MJ; Lee SJ; Kremenic IJ; Orishimo K; Ben-Avi S; McHugh M; Nicholas SJ
Arthroscopy; 2009 Apr; 25(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 19341920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical properties of suprapectoral biceps tenodesis: double knotless screw fixation is superior to single knotless screw fixation.
Hong CK; Chang CH; Chiang FL; Jou IM; Wang PH; Wang HN; Hsu KL; Kuan FC; Su WR
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2018 Aug; 138(8):1127-1134. PubMed ID: 29767346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical comparison of arthroscopically performable techniques for suprapectoral biceps tenodesis.
Patzer T; Rundic JM; Bobrowitsch E; Olender GD; Hurschler C; Schofer MD
Arthroscopy; 2011 Aug; 27(8):1036-47. PubMed ID: 21704467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long head biceps tenodesis with a knotless cinch suture anchor: a biomechanical analysis.
Kaback LA; Gowda AL; Paller D; Green A; Blaine T
Arthroscopy; 2015 May; 31(5):831-5. PubMed ID: 25660012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Remplissage Using Interconnected Knotless Anchors: Superior Biomechanical Properties to a Knotted Technique?
Funakoshi T; Hartzler R; Stewien E; Burkhart S
Arthroscopy; 2018 Nov; 34(11):2954-2959. PubMed ID: 30292597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
