These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25294315)

  • 21. Corneal biomechanics - a review.
    Kling S; Hafezi F
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 May; 37(3):240-252. PubMed ID: 28125860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Correlation between corneal biomechanical properties, applanation tonometry and direct intracameral tonometry.
    Yu AY; Duan SF; Zhao YE; Li XY; Lu F; Wang J; Wang QM
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 96(5):640-4. PubMed ID: 22190730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Numerical study on human cornea and modified multiparametric correction equation for Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Khan MA
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Feb; 30():91-102. PubMed ID: 24269944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Biomechanical and refractive behaviors of keratoconic cornea based on three-dimensional anisotropic hyperelastic models.
    Han Z; Sui X; Zhou D; Zhou C; Ren Q
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 29(4):282-90. PubMed ID: 23557227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Finite element analysis applied to cornea reshaping.
    Cabrera Fernández D; Niazy AM; Kurtz RM; Djotyan GP; Juhasz T
    J Biomed Opt; 2005; 10(6):064018. PubMed ID: 16409083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Three-dimensional modeling and computational analysis of the human cornea considering distributed collagen fibril orientations.
    Pandolfi A; Holzapfel GA
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Dec; 130(6):061006. PubMed ID: 19045535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [How does central cornea thickness influence intraocular pressure during applanation and contour tonometry?].
    Schwenteck T; Knappe M; Moros I
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Sep; 229(9):917-27. PubMed ID: 22972357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Modeling individual-specific human optic nerve head biomechanics. Part II: influence of material properties.
    Sigal IA; Flanagan JG; Tertinegg I; Ethier CR
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2009 Apr; 8(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 18301933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluating the material parameters of the human cornea in a numerical model.
    Sródka W
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2011; 13(3):77-85. PubMed ID: 22098299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A mechanical model of the cornea: the effects of physiological and surgical factors on radial keratotomy surgery.
    Vito RP; Shin TJ; McCarey BE
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1989; 5(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 2488791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Finite element modelling of cornea mechanics: a review.
    Nejad TM; Foster C; Gongal D
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2014; 77(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 25076377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Patient-specific finite-element simulation of the human cornea: a clinical validation study on cataract surgery.
    Studer HP; Riedwyl H; Amstutz CA; Hanson JV; Büchler P
    J Biomech; 2013 Feb; 46(4):751-8. PubMed ID: 23246043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Finite element modeling of corneal biomechanical behavior.
    Elsheikh A
    J Refract Surg; 2010 Apr; 26(4):289-300. PubMed ID: 20415325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer.
    Luce DA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):156-62. PubMed ID: 15721708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Assessment of the ex vivo biomechanical properties of porcine cornea with inflation test for corneal xenotransplantation.
    Bao F; Jiang L; Wang X; Zhang D; Wang Q; Zeng Y
    J Med Eng Technol; 2012 Jan; 36(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 22085017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In vivo measurement of regional corneal tangent modulus.
    Hon Y; Chen GZ; Lu SH; Lam DC; Lam AK
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):14974. PubMed ID: 29097675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Young's modulus in normal corneas and the effect on applanation tonometry.
    Hamilton KE; Pye DC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Jun; 85(6):445-50. PubMed ID: 18521022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Corneal biomechanics as a function of intraocular pressure and pachymetry by dynamic infrared signal and Scheimpflug imaging analysis in normal eyes.
    Huseynova T; Waring GO; Roberts C; Krueger RR; Tomita M
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Apr; 157(4):885-93. PubMed ID: 24388837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ex vivo, in vivo and in silico studies of corneal biomechanics: a systematic review.
    Mascolini MV; Toniolo I; Carniel EL; Fontanella CG
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2024 Jun; 47(2):403-441. PubMed ID: 38598066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Significance of corneal biomechanical properties in patients with progressive normal-tension glaucoma.
    Park JH; Jun RM; Choi KR
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jun; 99(6):746-51. PubMed ID: 25555704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.