These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25294931)

  • 1. Sexual selection on wing interference patterns in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Katayama N; Abbott JK; Kjærandsen J; Takahashi Y; Svensson EI
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Oct; 111(42):15144-8. PubMed ID: 25294931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stable structural color patterns displayed on transparent insect wings.
    Shevtsova E; Hansson C; Janzen DH; Kjærandsen J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2011 Jan; 108(2):668-73. PubMed ID: 21199954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sexual selection drives the evolution of male wing interference patterns.
    Hawkes MF; Duffy E; Joag R; Skeats A; Radwan J; Wedell N; Sharma MD; Hosken DJ; Troscianko J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 May; 286(1903):20182850. PubMed ID: 31138076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Love at first flight: wing interference patterns are species-specific and sexually dimorphic in blowflies (Diptera: Calliphoridae).
    Butterworth NJ; White TE; Byrne PG; Wallman JF
    J Evol Biol; 2021 Mar; 34(3):558-570. PubMed ID: 33483961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The evolution of wing color: male mate choice opposes adaptive wing color divergence in Colias butterflies.
    Ellers J; Boggs CL
    Evolution; 2003 May; 57(5):1100-6. PubMed ID: 12836826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessing the use of wing ornamentation and visual display in female choice sexual selection.
    Roy PR; Gleason JM
    Behav Processes; 2019 Jan; 158():89-96. PubMed ID: 30458226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Co-evolving wing spots and mating displays are genetically separable traits in Drosophila.
    Massey JH; Rice GR; Firdaus AS; Chen CY; Yeh SD; Stern DL; Wittkopp PJ
    Evolution; 2020 Jun; 74(6):1098-1111. PubMed ID: 32363590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evolution of wing pigmentation in Drosophila: Diversity, physiological regulation, and cis-regulatory evolution.
    Koshikawa S
    Dev Growth Differ; 2020 Jun; 62(5):269-278. PubMed ID: 32171022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Dynamic Optical Signal in a Nocturnal Moth.
    Kelley JL; Tatarnic NJ; Schröder-Turk GE; Endler JA; Wilts BD
    Curr Biol; 2019 Sep; 29(17):2919-2925.e2. PubMed ID: 31402306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative analysis of morphological traits among Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans: genetic variability, clines and phenotypic plasticity.
    Gibert P; Capy P; Imasheva A; Moreteau B; Morin JP; Pétavy G; David JR
    Genetica; 2004 Mar; 120(1-3):165-79. PubMed ID: 15088656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aristaless Controls Butterfly Wing Color Variation Used in Mimicry and Mate Choice.
    Westerman EL; VanKuren NW; Massardo D; Tenger-Trolander A; Zhang W; Hill RI; Perry M; Bayala E; Barr K; Chamberlain N; Douglas TE; Buerkle N; Palmer SE; Kronforst MR
    Curr Biol; 2018 Nov; 28(21):3469-3474.e4. PubMed ID: 30415702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How flies are flirting on the fly.
    Eichorn C; Hrabar M; Van Ryn EC; Brodie BS; Blake AJ; Gries G
    BMC Biol; 2017 Feb; 15(1):2. PubMed ID: 28193269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Linkage of butterfly mate preference and wing color preference cue at the genomic location of wingless.
    Kronforst MR; Young LG; Kapan DD; McNeely C; O'Neill RJ; Gilbert LE
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2006 Apr; 103(17):6575-80. PubMed ID: 16611733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dyeing insects for behavioral assays: the mating behavior of anesthetized Drosophila.
    Verspoor RL; Heys C; Price TA
    J Vis Exp; 2015 Apr; (98):. PubMed ID: 25938821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lack of response to artificial selection on developmental stability of partial wing shape components in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Tsujino M; Takahashi KH
    Genetica; 2014 Apr; 142(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 24744255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The genetic architecture of coordinately evolving male wing pigmentation and courtship behavior in Drosophila elegans and Drosophila gunungcola.
    Yeh SD; True JR
    G3 (Bethesda); 2014 Aug; 4(11):2079-93. PubMed ID: 25168010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genetic analysis of lines selected for wing vibration in Drosophila melanogaster.
    McDonald J
    Behav Genet; 1979 Nov; 9(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 262627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.
    Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is bigger better? Male body size affects wing-borne courtship signals and mating success in the olive fruit fly, Bactrocera oleae (Diptera: Tephritidae).
    Benelli G; Donati E; Romano D; Ragni G; Bonsignori G; Stefanini C; Canale A
    Insect Sci; 2016 Dec; 23(6):869-880. PubMed ID: 26173571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Divergence and correlated evolution of male wing spot and courtship display between Drosophila nepalensis and D. trilutea.
    Mo WZ; Li ZM; Deng XM; Chen AL; Ritchie MG; Yang DJ; He ZB; Toda MJ; Wen SY
    Insect Sci; 2022 Oct; 29(5):1445-1460. PubMed ID: 34939317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.