197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25295752)
1. Exploring the breadth of the top-down representations that control attentional disengagement.
Wright TJ; Boot WR; Jones JL
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(5):993-1006. PubMed ID: 25295752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Functional fixedness: The functional significance of delayed disengagement based on attention set.
Wright TJ; Boot WR; Brockmole JR
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 25384235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiple attentional sets while monitoring rapid serial visual presentations.
Kawahara JI; Kumada T
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Nov; 70(11):2271-2289. PubMed ID: 27603438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Brain structures involved in visual search in the presence and absence of color singletons.
Talsma D; Coe B; Munoz DP; Theeuwes J
J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Apr; 22(4):761-74. PubMed ID: 19309291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Time Course of Target Template Activation Processes during Preparation for Visual Search.
Grubert A; Eimer M
J Neurosci; 2018 Oct; 38(44):9527-9538. PubMed ID: 30242053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture.
Anderson BA; Folk CL
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1183-98. PubMed ID: 22673857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterizing the time course and nature of attentional disengagement effects.
Blakely DP; Wright TJ; Dehili VM; Boot WR; Brockmole JR
Vision Res; 2012 Mar; 56():38-48. PubMed ID: 22306925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Attentional set protects visual marking from visual transients.
Osugi T; Kawahara JI
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(1):69-90. PubMed ID: 22834464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Feature specificity in attentional capture by size and color.
Harris AM; Remington RW; Becker SI
J Vis; 2013 May; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 23650630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the temporal relation of top-down and bottom-up mechanisms during guidance of attention.
Wykowska A; Schubö A
J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Apr; 22(4):640-54. PubMed ID: 19309292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Real-world visual search is dominated by top-down guidance.
Chen X; Zelinsky GJ
Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(24):4118-33. PubMed ID: 17005231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Attentional capture does not depend on feature similarity, but on target-nontarget relations.
Becker SI; Folk CL; Remington RW
Psychol Sci; 2013 May; 24(5):634-47. PubMed ID: 23558547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Attentional capture decreases when distractors remain visible during rapid serial visual presentations.
Inukai T; Kumada T; Kawahara J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):939-50. PubMed ID: 20436191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pre-stimulus activity predicts the winner of top-down vs. bottom-up attentional selection.
Mazaheri A; DiQuattro NE; Bengson J; Geng JJ
PLoS One; 2011 Feb; 6(2):e16243. PubMed ID: 21386896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can intertrial priming account for the similarity effect in visual search?
Becker SI; Ansorge U; Horstmann G
Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(14):1738-56. PubMed ID: 19358862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attentional control during visual search: the effect of irrelevant singletons.
Theeuwes J; Burger R
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Oct; 24(5):1342-53. PubMed ID: 9778827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Should I stay or should I go? Attentional disengagement from visually unique and unexpected items at fixation.
Brockmole JR; Boot WR
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):808-15. PubMed ID: 19485693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identifying bottom-up and top-down components of attentional weight by experimental analysis and computational modeling.
Nordfang M; Dyrholm M; Bundesen C
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 May; 142(2):510-35. PubMed ID: 22889161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What is top-down about contingent capture?
Belopolsky AV; Schreij D; Theeuwes J
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):326-41. PubMed ID: 20139449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of target-distractor relationships in guiding attention and the eyes in visual search.
Becker SI
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2010 May; 139(2):247-65. PubMed ID: 20438251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
