118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25295793)
1. Health economic analysis of Breast Cancer Index in patients with ER+, LN- breast cancer.
Gustavsen G; Schroeder B; Kennedy P; Pothier KC; Erlander MG; Schnabel CA; Ali H
Am J Manag Care; 2014 Aug; 20(8):e302-10. PubMed ID: 25295793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using the 21-gene assay to guide adjuvant chemotherapy decision-making in early-stage breast cancer: a cost-effectiveness evaluation in the German setting.
Blohmer JU; Rezai M; Kümmel S; Kühn T; Warm M; Friedrichs K; Benkow A; Valentine WJ; Eiermann W
J Med Econ; 2013; 16(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 22966753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gene expression profiling and expanded immunohistochemistry tests to guide the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer management: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Ward S; Scope A; Rafia R; Pandor A; Harnan S; Evans P; Wyld L
Health Technol Assess; 2013 Oct; 17(44):1-302. PubMed ID: 24088296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective assessment of the decision-making impact of the Breast Cancer Index in recommending extended adjuvant endocrine therapy for patients with early-stage ER-positive breast cancer.
Sanft T; Aktas B; Schroeder B; Bossuyt V; DiGiovanna M; Abu-Khalaf M; Chung G; Silber A; Hofstatter E; Mougalian S; Epstein L; Hatzis C; Schnabel C; Pusztai L
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Dec; 154(3):533-41. PubMed ID: 26578401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term cost-effectiveness of Oncotype DX® versus current clinical practice from a Dutch cost perspective.
Kip M; Monteban H; Steuten L
J Comp Eff Res; 2015 Sep; 4(5):433-45. PubMed ID: 25872415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-utility of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in node-negative and node-positive breast cancer.
Lamond NW; Skedgel C; Rayson D; Lethbridge L; Younis T
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Jun; 133(3):1115-23. PubMed ID: 22361999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Economic impact of 21-gene recurrence score testing on early-stage breast cancer in Ireland.
Smyth L; Watson G; Walsh EM; Kelly CM; Keane M; Kennedy MJ; Grogan L; Hennessy BT; O'Reilly S; Coate LE; O'Connor M; Quinn C; Verleger K; Schoeman O; O'Reilly S; Walshe JM
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct; 153(3):573-82. PubMed ID: 26364296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical utility of genetic signatures in selecting adjuvant treatment: Risk stratification for early vs. late recurrences.
Hayes DF
Breast; 2015 Nov; 24 Suppl 2():S6-S10. PubMed ID: 26238437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of 21-gene assay in node-positive, early-stage breast cancer.
Vanderlaan BF; Broder MS; Chang EY; Oratz R; Bentley TG
Am J Manag Care; 2011; 17(7):455-64. PubMed ID: 21819166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Economic evaluation of the 21-gene signature (Oncotype DX) in lymph node-negative/positive, hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer based on Japanese validation study (JBCRG-TR03).
Kondo M; Hoshi SL; Yamanaka T; Ishiguro H; Toi M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2011 Jun; 127(3):739-49. PubMed ID: 21082239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost effectiveness of gene expression profiling for early stage breast cancer: a decision-analytic model.
Yang M; Rajan S; Issa AM
Cancer; 2012 Oct; 118(20):5163-70. PubMed ID: 22359236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Cost-effectiveness of a chemotherapy predictive test].
Vataire AL; Laas E; Aballéa S; Gligorov J; Rouzier R; Chéreau E
Bull Cancer; 2012 Oct; 99(10):907-14. PubMed ID: 23041366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Economic analysis of targeting chemotherapy using a 21-gene RT-PCR assay in lymph-node-negative, estrogen-receptor-positive, early-stage breast cancer.
Hornberger J; Cosler LE; Lyman GH
Am J Manag Care; 2005 May; 11(5):313-24. PubMed ID: 15898220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Benefit and projected cost-effectiveness of anastrozole versus tamoxifen as initial adjuvant therapy for patients with early-stage estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
Hillner BE
Cancer; 2004 Sep; 101(6):1311-22. PubMed ID: 15368322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is the 21-gene recurrence score a cost-effective assay in endocrine-sensitive node-negative breast cancer?
Lamond NW; Skedgel C; Younis T
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2013 Apr; 13(2):243-50. PubMed ID: 23570435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Economic evaluation of the 70-gene prognosis-signature (MammaPrint®) in hormone receptor-positive, lymph node-negative, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-negative early stage breast cancer in Japan.
Kondo M; Hoshi SL; Ishiguro H; Toi M
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2012 Jun; 133(2):759-68. PubMed ID: 22315134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay compared with standard clinicopathologic guidelines in adjuvant therapy selection for node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
Partin JF; Mamounas EP
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Nov; 18(12):3399-406. PubMed ID: 21537874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast cancer index identifies early-stage estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients at risk for early- and late-distant recurrence.
Zhang Y; Schnabel CA; Schroeder BE; Jerevall PL; Jankowitz RC; Fornander T; Stål O; Brufsky AM; Sgroi D; Erlander MG
Clin Cancer Res; 2013 Aug; 19(15):4196-205. PubMed ID: 23757354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Cost-Effectiveness of the 21 Gene Assay in Patients with Node-Positive Breast Cancer].
Fischer L; Arnold M; Kirsch F; Leidl R
Gesundheitswesen; 2016 Nov; 78(11):772-780. PubMed ID: 26107965
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Economic implications of 21-gene breast cancer risk assay from the perspective of an Israeli-managed health-care organization.
Klang SH; Hammerman A; Liebermann N; Efrat N; Doberne J; Hornberger J
Value Health; 2010; 13(4):381-7. PubMed ID: 20412544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
