BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25295889)

  • 21. Repairing ceramic restorations: final solution or alternative procedure?
    Reston EG; Filho SC; Arossi G; Cogo RB; Rocha Cdos S; Closs LQ
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(4):461-6. PubMed ID: 18666506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Preparing anterior teeth for indirect restorations.
    Brunton PA
    Dent Update; 2004 Apr; 31(3):131-6. PubMed ID: 15116482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
    Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An esthetic solution to the screw-retained implant restoration: introduction to the implant crown adhesive plug: clinical report.
    Wadhwani C; Piñeyro A; Avots J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 23(3):138-43. PubMed ID: 21649826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Do surface treatments affect the optical properties of ceramic veneers?
    Turgut S; Bağış B; Korkmaz FM; Tamam E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):618-24. PubMed ID: 24840909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Remakes of Colorlogic and IPS Empress ceramic restorations in general practice.
    Hekland H; Riise T; Berg E
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):621-5. PubMed ID: 14714841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Salvaging a porcelain/metal bridge with a bonded porcelain-fused-to-metal overcasting.
    Mancuso A
    Gen Dent; 2003; 51(5):456-7. PubMed ID: 15055636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical study on the reasons for and location of failures of metal-ceramic restorations and survival of repairs.
    Ozcan M; Niedermeier W
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(3):299-302. PubMed ID: 12066495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bond strength durability of a resin composite on a reinforced ceramic using various repair systems.
    Ozcan M; Valandro LF; Amaral R; Leite F; Bottino MA
    Dent Mater; 2009 Dec; 25(12):1477-83. PubMed ID: 19671476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Impact of Bruxism on Ceramic Defects in Implant-Borne Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Retrospective Study.
    Mikeli A; Walter MH
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(3):296-8. PubMed ID: 27148995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study.
    Vanoorbeek S; Vandamme K; Lijnen I; Naert I
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 20552087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of different etching times of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel on the shear bond strength of high-leucite ceramics bonded to composite resin.
    Kukiattrakoon B; Thammasitboon K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jul; 98(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 17631170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fracture frequency of all-ceramic crowns during dynamic loading in a chewing simulator using different loading and luting protocols.
    Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Zellweger G; Büchler A; Zappini G
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1352-61. PubMed ID: 18433859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In vivo fracture resistance of implant-supported all-ceramic restorations.
    Yildirim M; Fischer H; Marx R; Edelhoff D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):325-31. PubMed ID: 14564286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Salvaging fractured porcelain crowns with a direct composite repair technique.
    Ahmad I
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2002 Apr; 14(3):233-8; quiz 240. PubMed ID: 12004631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effect of resin cement and ceramic thickness on final color of laminate veneers: an in vitro study.
    Turgut S; Bagis B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 23522367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of veneer thickness on residual stress profile in veneering ceramic: measurement by hole-drilling.
    Mainjot AK; Schajer GS; Vanheusden AJ; Sadoun MJ
    Dent Mater; 2012 Feb; 28(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 22153325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation.
    Kohal RJ; Klaus G; Strub JR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16958698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fatigue resistance of 2 different CAD/CAM glass-ceramic materials used for single-tooth implant crowns.
    Çavuşoğlu Y; Sahin E; Gürbüz R; Akça K
    Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):374-8. PubMed ID: 21881517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Ceramic (Feldspathic & IPS Empress II) vs. laboratory composite (Gradia) veneers; a comparison between their shear bond strength to enamel; an in vitro study.
    Nikzad S; Azari A; Dehgan S
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jul; 37(7):569-74. PubMed ID: 20085614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.