748 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25296614)
1. Differences between MEG and high-density EEG source localizations using a distributed source model in comparison to fMRI.
Klamer S; Elshahabi A; Lerche H; Braun C; Erb M; Scheffler K; Focke NK
Brain Topogr; 2015 Jan; 28(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25296614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of anisotropic electrical conductivity in white matter tissue on the EEG/MEG forward and inverse solution. A high-resolution whole head simulation study.
Güllmar D; Haueisen J; Reichenbach JR
Neuroimage; 2010 May; 51(1):145-63. PubMed ID: 20156576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A technique to consider mismatches between fMRI and EEG/MEG sources for fMRI-constrained EEG/MEG source imaging: a preliminary simulation study.
Im CH; Lee SY
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(23):6005-21. PubMed ID: 17110766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A novel integrated MEG and EEG analysis method for dipolar sources.
Huang MX; Song T; Hagler DJ; Podgorny I; Jousmaki V; Cui L; Gaa K; Harrington DL; Dale AM; Lee RR; Elman J; Halgren E
Neuroimage; 2007 Sep; 37(3):731-48. PubMed ID: 17658272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Integrated MEG/EEG and fMRI model based on neural masses.
Babajani A; Soltanian-Zadeh H
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1794-801. PubMed ID: 16941835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A three domain covariance framework for EEG/MEG data.
Roś BP; Bijma F; de Gunst MC; de Munck JC
Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 119():305-15. PubMed ID: 26072253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: comparison to fMRI in focally stimulated visual cortex.
Sharon D; Hämäläinen MS; Tootell RB; Halgren E; Belliveau JW
Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(4):1225-35. PubMed ID: 17532230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
Engemann DA; Gramfort A
Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multimodal functional imaging using fMRI-informed regional EEG/MEG source estimation.
Ou W; Nummenmaa A; Ahveninen J; Belliveau JW; Hämäläinen MS; Golland P
Neuroimage; 2010 Aug; 52(1):97-108. PubMed ID: 20211266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anatomical constraints on source models for high-resolution EEG and MEG derived from MRI.
Srinivasan R
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Aug; 5(4):389-99. PubMed ID: 16866569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of stimulation type, head modeling, and combined EEG and MEG on the source reconstruction of the somatosensory P20/N20 component.
Antonakakis M; Schrader S; Wollbrink A; Oostenveld R; Rampp S; Haueisen J; Wolters CH
Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 Dec; 40(17):5011-5028. PubMed ID: 31397966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. EEG/MEG source imaging using fMRI informed time-variant constraints.
Xu J; Sheng J; Qian T; Luo YJ; Gao JH
Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Apr; 39(4):1700-1711. PubMed ID: 29293277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Complex patterns of spatially extended generators of epileptic activity: Comparison of source localization methods cMEM and 4-ExSo-MUSIC on high resolution EEG and MEG data.
Chowdhury RA; Merlet I; Birot G; Kobayashi E; Nica A; Biraben A; Wendling F; Lina JM; Albera L; Grova C
Neuroimage; 2016 Dec; 143():175-195. PubMed ID: 27561712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multimodal effective connectivity analysis reveals seizure focus and propagation in musicogenic epilepsy.
Klamer S; Rona S; Elshahabi A; Lerche H; Braun C; Honegger J; Erb M; Focke NK
Neuroimage; 2015 Jun; 113():70-7. PubMed ID: 25797835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anatomically constrained dipole adjustment (ANACONDA) for accurate MEG/EEG focal source localizations.
Im CH; Jung HK; Fujimaki N
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 50(20):4931-53. PubMed ID: 16204881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Motor area localization using fMRI-constrained cortical current density reconstruction of movement-related cortical potentials, a comparison with fMRI and TMS mapping.
Inuggi A; Filippi M; Chieffo R; Agosta F; Rocca MA; González-Rosa JJ; Cursi M; Comi G; Leocani L
Brain Res; 2010 Jan; 1308():68-78. PubMed ID: 19853590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Wavelet analysis as a tool for investigating movement-related cortical oscillations in EEG-fMRI coregistration.
Storti SF; Formaggio E; Beltramello A; Fiaschi A; Manganotti P
Brain Topogr; 2010 Mar; 23(1):46-57. PubMed ID: 19921416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetoencephalography is more successful for screening and localizing frontal lobe epilepsy than electroencephalography.
Ossenblok P; de Munck JC; Colon A; Drolsbach W; Boon P
Epilepsia; 2007 Nov; 48(11):2139-49. PubMed ID: 17662061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
