These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25299381)
1. Quantifying environmental DNA signals for aquatic invasive species across multiple detection platforms. Nathan LM; Simmons M; Wegleitner BJ; Jerde CL; Mahon AR Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Nov; 48(21):12800-6. PubMed ID: 25299381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of droplet digital PCR for estimation of fish abundance and biomass in environmental DNA surveys. Doi H; Uchii K; Takahara T; Matsuhashi S; Yamanaka H; Minamoto T PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0122763. PubMed ID: 25799582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) outperforms real-time PCR in the detection of environmental DNA from an invasive fish species. Doi H; Takahara T; Minamoto T; Matsuhashi S; Uchii K; Yamanaka H Environ Sci Technol; 2015 May; 49(9):5601-8. PubMed ID: 25850372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combining ddPCR and environmental DNA to improve detection capabilities of a critically endangered freshwater invertebrate. Mauvisseau Q; Davy-Bowker J; Bulling M; Brys R; Neyrinck S; Troth C; Sweet M Sci Rep; 2019 Oct; 9(1):14064. PubMed ID: 31575968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. No filters, no fridges: a method for preservation of water samples for eDNA analysis. Williams KE; Huyvaert KP; Piaggio AJ BMC Res Notes; 2016 Jun; 9():298. PubMed ID: 27278936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection limits of quantitative and digital PCR assays and their influence in presence-absence surveys of environmental DNA. Hunter ME; Dorazio RM; Butterfield JS; Meigs-Friend G; Nico LG; Ferrante JA Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Mar; 17(2):221-229. PubMed ID: 27768244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of a quantitative polymerase chain reaction assay and environmental DNA sampling methods for Giant Gartersnake (Thamnophis gigas). Schumer G; Hansen EC; Anders PJ; Blankenship SM PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222493. PubMed ID: 31525228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detecting an elusive invasive species: a diagnostic PCR to detect Burmese python in Florida waters and an assessment of persistence of environmental DNA. Piaggio AJ; Engeman RM; Hopken MW; Humphrey JS; Keacher KL; Bruce WE; Avery ML Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 Mar; 14(2):374-80. PubMed ID: 24119154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Isothermal amplification of environmental DNA (eDNA) for direct field-based monitoring and laboratory confirmation of Dreissena sp. Williams MR; Stedtfeld RD; Engle C; Salach P; Fakher U; Stedtfeld T; Dreelin E; Stevenson RJ; Latimore J; Hashsham SA PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186462. PubMed ID: 29036210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mosquitoes on a chip-environmental DNA-based detection of invasive mosquito species using high-throughput real-time PCR. Wittwer C; Sharif C; Schöck I; Klimpel S PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17782. PubMed ID: 39364359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accurate detection and quantification of seasonal abundance of American bullfrog (Lithobates catesbeianus) using ddPCR eDNA assays. Everts T; Halfmaerten D; Neyrinck S; De Regge N; Jacquemyn H; Brys R Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):11282. PubMed ID: 34050232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. eDNA as a tool for identifying freshwater species in sustainable forestry: A critical review and potential future applications. Coble AA; Flinders CA; Homyack JA; Penaluna BE; Cronn RC; Weitemier K Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 649():1157-1170. PubMed ID: 30308887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of droplet digital PCR and quantitative PCR for the detection of Salmonella and its application for river sediments. Singh G; Sithebe A; Enitan AM; Kumari S; Bux F; Stenström TA J Water Health; 2017 Aug; 15(4):505-508. PubMed ID: 28771147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliable eDNA detection and quantification of the European weather loach (Misgurnus fossilis). Brys R; Halfmaerten D; Neyrinck S; Mauvisseau Q; Auwerx J; Sweet M; Mergeay J J Fish Biol; 2021 Feb; 98(2):399-414. PubMed ID: 32154579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of environmental DNA to detect an endangered marine skate species in the wild. Weltz K; Lyle JM; Ovenden J; Morgan JAT; Moreno DA; Semmens JM PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178124. PubMed ID: 28591215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the Environmental DNA Method for Estimating Distribution and Biomass of Submerged Aquatic Plants. Matsuhashi S; Doi H; Fujiwara A; Watanabe S; Minamoto T PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0156217. PubMed ID: 27304876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of next-generation droplet digital PCR with quantitative PCR for enumeration of Naegleria fowleri in environmental water and clinical samples. Xue J; Caton K; Sherchan SP Lett Appl Microbiol; 2018 Oct; 67(4):322-328. PubMed ID: 30007064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Drop it all: extraction-free detection of targeted marine species through optimized direct droplet digital PCR. Scriver M; von Ammon U; Youngbull C; Pochon X; Stanton JL; Gemmell NJ; Zaiko A PeerJ; 2024; 12():e16969. PubMed ID: 38410796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Variably improved microbial source tracking with digital droplet PCR. Nshimyimana JP; Cruz MC; Wuertz S; Thompson JR Water Res; 2019 Aug; 159():192-202. PubMed ID: 31096066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development and Validation of Environmental DNA (eDNA) Markers for Detection of Freshwater Turtles. Davy CM; Kidd AG; Wilson CC PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0130965. PubMed ID: 26200348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]