These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25299636)
1. Tacrolimus Versus Cyclosporine as Primary Immunosuppressant After Renal Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis and Economics Evaluation. Liu JY; You RX; Guo M; Zeng L; Zhou P; Zhu L; Xu G; Li J; Liu D Am J Ther; 2016; 23(3):e810-24. PubMed ID: 25299636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sirolimus Versus Tacrolimus as Primary Immunosuppressant After Renal Transplantation: A Meta-Analysis and Economics Evaluation. Liu JY; Song M; Guo M; Huang F; Ma BJ; Zhu L; Xu G; Li J; You RX Am J Ther; 2016; 23(6):e1720-e1728. PubMed ID: 25569597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Induction with and without antithymocyte globulin combined with cyclosporine/tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in renal transplantation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Tian JH; Wang X; Yang KH; Liu AP; Luo XF; Zhang J Transplant Proc; 2009 Nov; 41(9):3671-6. PubMed ID: 19917365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tacrolimus versus cyclosporin in renal transplantation in Italy: cost-minimisation and cost-effectiveness analyses. Lazzaro C; McKechnie T; McKenna M J Nephrol; 2002; 15(5):580-8. PubMed ID: 12455727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A network meta-analysis of the efficacy of belatacept, cyclosporine and tacrolimus for immunosuppression therapy in adult renal transplant recipients. Goring SM; Levy AR; Ghement I; Kalsekar A; Eyawo O; L'Italien GJ; Kasiske B Curr Med Res Opin; 2014 Aug; 30(8):1473-87. PubMed ID: 24628478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tacrolimus versus cyclosporin as primary immunosuppression for kidney transplant recipients. Webster A; Woodroffe RC; Taylor RS; Chapman JR; Craig JC Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2005 Oct; (4):CD003961. PubMed ID: 16235347 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The cost effectiveness of tacrolimus versus microemulsified cyclosporin: a 10-year model of renal transplantation outcomes. Orme ME; Jurewicz WA; Kumar N; McKechnie TL Pharmacoeconomics; 2003; 21(17):1263-76. PubMed ID: 14986738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of tacrolimus in renal transplantation. Bowman LJ; Brennan DC Expert Opin Pharmacother; 2008 Mar; 9(4):635-43. PubMed ID: 18312164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A cost-utility analysis of prolonged-release tacrolimus relative to immediate-release tacrolimus and ciclosporin in liver transplant recipients in the UK. Muduma G; Odeyemi I; Pollock RF J Med Econ; 2016 Oct; 19(10):995-1002. PubMed ID: 27172118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tacrolimus versus cyclosporine for adult lung transplant recipients: a meta-analysis. Fan Y; Xiao YB; Weng YG Transplant Proc; 2009 Jun; 41(5):1821-4. PubMed ID: 19545736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating the economic implications of non-adherence and antibody-mediated rejection in renal transplant recipients: the role of once-daily tacrolimus in the UK. Muduma G; Odeyemi I; Pollock RF J Med Econ; 2015; 18(12):1050-9. PubMed ID: 26201252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of immunosuppressive regimens in renal transplant recipients in Germany: a model approach. Jürgensen JS; Arns W; Hass B Eur J Health Econ; 2010 Feb; 11(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 19296139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tacrolimus versus cyclosporine microemulsion for heart transplant recipients: a meta-analysis. Ye F; Ying-Bin X; Yu-Guo W; Hetzer R J Heart Lung Transplant; 2009 Jan; 28(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 19134532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Cyclosporine versus tacrolimus in kidney transplants in Brazil: a cost comparison]. Guerra Junior AA; Acúrcio Fde A; Andrade EI; Cherchiglia ML; Cesar CC; Queiroz OV; Silva GD Cad Saude Publica; 2010 Jan; 26(1):163-74. PubMed ID: 20209220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-year posttransplant graft survival in renal-transplant patients with graft function at 6 months receiving tacrolimus or cyclosporine microemulsion within a triple-drug regimen. Irish W; Sherrill B; Brennan DC; Lowell J; Schnitzler M Transplantation; 2003 Dec; 76(12):1686-90. PubMed ID: 14688516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of the cost effectiveness of sirolimus versus tacrolimus for immunosuppression following renal transplantation in the UK. McEwan P; Dixon S; Baboolal K; Conway P; Currie CJ Pharmacoeconomics; 2006; 24(1):67-79. PubMed ID: 16445304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomized, prospective, pharmacoeconomic trial of tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in combination with thymoglobulin in renal transplant recipients. Hardinger KL; Bohl DL; Schnitzler MA; Lockwood M; Storch GA; Brennan DC Transplantation; 2005 Jul; 80(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 16003231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The long-term outcomes and costs of diabetes mellitus among renal transplant recipients: tacrolimus versus cyclosporine. Woodward RS; Flore MC; Machnicki G; Brennan DC Value Health; 2011 Jun; 14(4):443-9. PubMed ID: 21315636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A UK analysis of the cost of switching renal transplant patients from an immediate-release to a prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus based on differences in trough concentration variability. Muduma G; Odeyemi I; Pollock RF J Med Econ; 2014 Jul; 17(7):520-6. PubMed ID: 24754700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]