These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25299759)

  • 21. Women's Mating Strategies and Mate Value Are Associated with Viewing Time to Facial Masculinity.
    Garza R; Byrd-Craven J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2023 Jul; 52(5):2143-2151. PubMed ID: 37245165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Do assortative preferences contribute to assortative mating for adiposity?
    Fisher CI; Fincher CL; Hahn AC; Little AC; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    Br J Psychol; 2014 Nov; 105(4):474-85. PubMed ID: 24168811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. British men's hair color preferences: an assessment of courtship solicitation and stimulus ratings.
    Swami V; Barrett S
    Scand J Psychol; 2011 Dec; 52(6):595-600. PubMed ID: 21883260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Men's, but not women's, sociosexual orientation predicts couples' perceptions of sexually dimorphic cues in own-sex faces.
    Kandrik M; Fincher CL; Jones BC; DeBruine LM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Jul; 43(5):965-71. PubMed ID: 24366658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of Women's Short-Term Mating Orientation and Self-Perceived Attractiveness in Rating and Viewing Men's Waist to Chest Ratios.
    Garza R; Byrd-Craven J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 Feb; 50(2):543-551. PubMed ID: 33057831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The "booty call": a compromise between men's and women's ideal mating strategies.
    Jonason PK; Li NP; Cason MJ
    J Sex Res; 2009; 46(5):460-70. PubMed ID: 19253133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Experimental Evidence for Sex Differences in Sexual Variety Preferences: Support for the Coolidge Effect in Humans.
    Hughes SM; Aung T; Harrison MA; LaFayette JN; Gallup GG
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 Feb; 50(2):495-509. PubMed ID: 32440927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Implicit and explicit preferences for physical attractiveness in a romantic partner: a double dissociation in predictive validity.
    Eastwick PW; Eagly AH; Finkel EJ; Johnson SE
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Nov; 101(5):993-1011. PubMed ID: 21767032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of attractiveness and status in dating desire in homosexual and heterosexual men and women.
    Ha T; van den Berg JE; Engels RC; Lichtwarck-Aschoff A
    Arch Sex Behav; 2012 Jun; 41(3):673-82. PubMed ID: 21979410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reading men's faces: women's mate attractiveness judgments track men's testosterone and interest in infants.
    Roney JR; Hanson KN; Durante KM; Maestripieri D
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Sep; 273(1598):2169-75. PubMed ID: 16901836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The mere presence of opposite-sex others on judgments of sexual and romantic desirability: opposite effects for men and women.
    Hill SE; Buss DM
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 May; 34(5):635-47. PubMed ID: 18303129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reproductive ambition predicts partnered, but not unpartnered, women's preferences for masculine men.
    Watkins CD
    Br J Psychol; 2012 Aug; 103(3):317-29. PubMed ID: 22804699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Development and Psychometric Evaluation of a New Mating Effort Questionnaire.
    Albert G; Richardson GB; Arnocky S; Senveli Z; Hodges-Simeon CR
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 Feb; 50(2):511-530. PubMed ID: 32839933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Individual Differences in How Desirable People Think They Are as a Mate.
    Csajbók Z; Štěrbová Z; Brewer G; Cândea CA; De Backer CJS; Fernández AM; Fisher ML; Garcia JR; Kruger DJ; Massar K; Oberzaucher E; Quintelier KJP; van Geffen RE; Valentova JV; Varella MAC; Jonason PK
    Arch Sex Behav; 2023 Aug; 52(6):2475-2490. PubMed ID: 37154879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Peacocks, Porsches, and Thorstein Veblen: conspicuous consumption as a sexual signaling system.
    Sundie JM; Kenrick DT; Griskevicius V; Tybur JM; Vohs KD; Beal DJ
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Apr; 100(4):664-80. PubMed ID: 21038972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Heterosexual romantic couples mate assortatively for facial symmetry, but not masculinity.
    Burriss RP; Roberts SC; Welling LL; Puts DA; Little AC
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2011 May; 37(5):601-13. PubMed ID: 21343440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Sociosexual orientation and 2D:4D ratios in women: Relationship to men's desirability ratings as a long-term pair bond.
    DeLecce TL; Polheber JP; Matchock RL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2014 Feb; 43(2):319-27. PubMed ID: 24356948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Same-sex gaze attraction influences mate-choice copying in humans.
    Yorzinski JL; Platt ML
    PLoS One; 2010 Feb; 5(2):e9115. PubMed ID: 20161739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Gender differences in implicit self-esteem following a romantic partner's success or failure.
    Ratliff KA; Oishi S
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Oct; 105(4):688-702. PubMed ID: 23915040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Adolescents' Sexual Encounters With Either Romantic or Casual Partners and the Quality of Their Romantic Relationships Four Years Later.
    Shulman S; Scharf M; Ziv I; Norona J; Welsh DP
    J Sex Res; 2020 Feb; 57(2):155-165. PubMed ID: 30632792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.