BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25299763)

  • 1. Impressions of dominance are made relative to others in the visual environment.
    Re DE; Lefevre CE; DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Perrett DI
    Evol Psychol; 2014 Mar; 12(1):251-63. PubMed ID: 25299763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Observers use facial masculinity to make physical dominance assessments following 100-ms exposure.
    Albert G; Wells E; Arnocky S; Liu CH; Hodges-Simeon CR
    Aggress Behav; 2021 Mar; 47(2):226-235. PubMed ID: 33244752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integrating gaze direction and sexual dimorphism of face shape when perceiving the dominance of others.
    Main JC; Jones BC; DeBruine LM; Little AC
    Perception; 2009; 38(9):1275-83. PubMed ID: 19911626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The masculinity paradox: facial masculinity and beardedness interact to determine women's ratings of men's facial attractiveness.
    Dixson BJ; Sulikowski D; Gouda-Vossos A; Rantala MJ; Brooks RC
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Nov; 29(11):2311-2320. PubMed ID: 27488414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of Perceived Height, Masculinity, and Age on Each Other and on Perceptions of Dominance in Male Faces.
    Batres C; Re DE; Perrett DI
    Perception; 2015; 44(11):1293-309. PubMed ID: 26562897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Does Adult Sex Ratio Predict Regional Variation in Facial Dominance Perceptions? Evidence From an Analysis of U.S. States.
    Torrance JS; Kandrik M; Lee AJ; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    Evol Psychol; 2018; 16(2):1474704918776748. PubMed ID: 29860865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The importance of face-shape masculinity for perceptions of male dominance depends on study design.
    Dong J; Leger K; Shiramizu VKM; Marcinkowska UM; Lee AJ; Jones BC
    Sci Rep; 2023 Aug; 13(1):12620. PubMed ID: 37537340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relative contributions of facial shape and surface information to perceptions of attractiveness and dominance.
    Torrance JS; Wincenciak J; Hahn AC; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e104415. PubMed ID: 25349994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Second to fourth digit ratio, testosterone and perceived male dominance.
    Neave N; Laing S; Fink B; Manning JT
    Proc Biol Sci; 2003 Oct; 270(1529):2167-72. PubMed ID: 14561281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new data-driven mathematical model dissociates attractiveness from sexual dimorphism of human faces.
    Nakamura K; Watanabe K
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):16588. PubMed ID: 33024137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Motivational Salience of Faces Is Related to Both Their Valence and Dominance.
    Wang H; Hahn AC; DeBruine LM; Jones BC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161114. PubMed ID: 27513859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facial cues to perceived height influence leadership choices in simulated war and peace contexts.
    Re DE; DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Perrett DI
    Evol Psychol; 2013 Jan; 11(1):89-103. PubMed ID: 23372088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Face gender and stereotypicality influence facial trait evaluation: Counter-stereotypical female faces are negatively evaluated.
    Sutherland CA; Young AW; Mootz CA; Oldmeadow JA
    Br J Psychol; 2015 May; 106(2):186-208. PubMed ID: 25168952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A new viewpoint on the evolution of sexually dimorphic human faces.
    Burke D; Sulikowski D
    Evol Psychol; 2010 Oct; 8(4):573-85. PubMed ID: 22947821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Human Face Tilt Is a Dynamic Social Signal That Affects Perceptions of Dimorphism, Attractiveness, and Dominance.
    Marshall P; Bartolacci A; Burke D
    Evol Psychol; 2020; 18(1):1474704920910403. PubMed ID: 32124644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Facial cues of dominance modulate the short-term gaze-cuing effect in human observers.
    Jones BC; DeBruine LM; Main JC; Little AC; Welling LL; Feinberg DR; Tiddeman BP
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Feb; 277(1681):617-24. PubMed ID: 19864283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of masculinity and distinctiveness in judgments of human male facial attractiveness.
    Little AC; Hancock PJ
    Br J Psychol; 2002 Nov; 93(Pt 4):451-64. PubMed ID: 12519528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influences of observer sex, facial masculinity, and gender role identification on first impressions of men's faces.
    Macapagal KR; Rupp HA; Heiman JR
    J Soc Evol Cult Psychol; 2011 Jan; 5(1):92-105. PubMed ID: 21874151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Facing aggression: cues differ for female versus male faces.
    Geniole SN; Keyes AE; Mondloch CJ; Carré JM; McCormick CM
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(1):e30366. PubMed ID: 22276184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Geometric morphometrics of male facial shape in relation to physical strength and perceived attractiveness, dominance, and masculinity.
    Windhager S; Schaefer K; Fink B
    Am J Hum Biol; 2011; 23(6):805-14. PubMed ID: 21957062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.