BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25299763)

  • 21. Evidence from Meta-Analyses of the Facial Width-to-Height Ratio as an Evolved Cue of Threat.
    Geniole SN; Denson TF; Dixson BJ; Carré JM; McCormick CM
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132726. PubMed ID: 26181579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Correlated male preferences for femininity in female faces and voices.
    Fraccaro PJ; Feinberg DR; DeBruine LM; Little AC; Watkins CD; Jones BC
    Evol Psychol; 2010 Aug; 8(3):447-61. PubMed ID: 22947812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Non-Pregnant and Pregnant Women's Femininity Preferences in Male Faces: Tests Based on Within- and Between-Sex Sexual Dimorphism Facial Manipulations.
    Wen F; Zuo B; Wang Y; Ma S; Song S; Zhang H
    Arch Sex Behav; 2021 Feb; 50(2):531-541. PubMed ID: 33398708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A Facial-Action Imposter: How Head Tilt Influences Perceptions of Dominance From a Neutral Face.
    Witkower Z; Tracy JL
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Jun; 30(6):893-906. PubMed ID: 31009583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Relative Contribution of Jawbone and Cheekbone Prominence, Eyebrow Thickness, Eye Size, and Face Length to Evaluations of Facial Masculinity and Attractiveness: A Conjoint Data-Driven Approach.
    Mogilski JK; Welling LLM
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2428. PubMed ID: 30568613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Revealing Hidden Gender Biases in Competence Impressions of Faces.
    Oh D; Buck EA; Todorov A
    Psychol Sci; 2019 Jan; 30(1):65-79. PubMed ID: 30526301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Face of a fighter: Bizygomatic width as a cue of formidability.
    Zilioli S; Sell AN; Stirrat M; Jagore J; Vickerman W; Watson NV
    Aggress Behav; 2015; 41(4):322-30. PubMed ID: 24910133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dominance or Integration? Influence of Sexual Dimorphism and Clothing Color on Judgments of Male and Female Targets' Attractiveness, Warmth, and Competence.
    Wen F; Qiao Y; Zuo B; Ye H; Ding Y; Wang Q; Ma S
    Arch Sex Behav; 2022 Aug; 51(6):2823-2836. PubMed ID: 35668276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sexual dimorphism and personality attributions of male faces.
    Pivonkova V; Rubesova A; Lindova J; Havlicek J
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1137-43. PubMed ID: 21901645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Relative Importance of Sexual Dimorphism, Fluctuating Asymmetry, and Color Cues to Health during Evaluation of Potential Partners' Facial Photographs : A Conjoint Analysis Study.
    Mogilski JK; Welling LL
    Hum Nat; 2017 Mar; 28(1):53-75. PubMed ID: 27752965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The face of female dominance: Women with dominant faces have lower cortisol.
    Gonzalez-Santoyo I; Wheatley JR; Welling LL; Cárdenas RA; Jimenez-Trejo F; Dawood K; Puts DA
    Horm Behav; 2015 May; 71():16-21. PubMed ID: 25857930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How well do men's faces and voices index mate quality and dominance?
    Doll LM; Hill AK; Rotella MA; Cárdenas RA; Welling LL; Wheatley JR; Puts DA
    Hum Nat; 2014 Jun; 25(2):200-12. PubMed ID: 24578029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The role of facial attractiveness and facial masculinity/femininity in sex classification of faces.
    Hoss RA; Ramsey JL; Griffin AM; Langlois JH
    Perception; 2005; 34(12):1459-74. PubMed ID: 16457167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Correlated Preferences for Male Facial Masculinity and Partner Traits in Gay and Bisexual Men in China.
    Zheng L; Zheng Y
    Arch Sex Behav; 2015 Jul; 44(5):1423-30. PubMed ID: 25331614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Physical Strength as a Cue to Dominance: A Data-Driven Approach.
    Toscano H; Schubert TW; Dotsch R; Falvello V; Todorov A
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2016 Dec; 42(12):1603-1616. PubMed ID: 27758971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mating Strategies and the Masculinity Paradox: How Relationship Context, Relationship Status, and Sociosexuality Shape Women's Preferences for Facial Masculinity and Beardedness.
    Stower RE; Lee AJ; McIntosh TL; Sidari MJ; Sherlock JM; Dixson BJW
    Arch Sex Behav; 2020 Apr; 49(3):809-820. PubMed ID: 31016490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Neural activation during anticipation of opposite-sex and same-sex faces in heterosexual men and women.
    Spreckelmeyer KN; Rademacher L; Paulus FM; Gründer G
    Neuroimage; 2013 Feb; 66():223-31. PubMed ID: 23128082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Correlated preferences for facial masculinity and ideal or actual partner's masculinity.
    DeBruine LM; Jones BC; Little AC; Boothroyd LG; Perrett DI; Penton-Voak IS; Cooper PA; Penke L; Feinberg DR; Tiddeman BP
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Jun; 273(1592):1355-60. PubMed ID: 16777723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The influence of subtle facial expressions on children's first impressions of trustworthiness and dominance is not adult-like.
    Mondloch CJ; Gerada A; Proietti V; Nelson NL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2019 Apr; 180():19-38. PubMed ID: 30611111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Human brain structure predicts individual differences in preconscious evaluation of facial dominance and trustworthiness.
    Getov S; Kanai R; Bahrami B; Rees G
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2015 May; 10(5):690-9. PubMed ID: 25193945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.