435 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25299798)
41. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: comparison with conventional DWI.
Liu C; Liang C; Liu Z; Zhang S; Huang B
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e782-9. PubMed ID: 24034833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses.
Berg WA; Cosgrove DO; Doré CJ; Schäfer FK; Svensson WE; Hooley RJ; Ohlinger R; Mendelson EB; Balu-Maestro C; Locatelli M; Tourasse C; Cavanaugh BC; Juhan V; Stavros AT; Tardivon A; Gay J; Henry JP; Cohen-Bacrie C;
Radiology; 2012 Feb; 262(2):435-49. PubMed ID: 22282182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Influence of various breast factors on the quality of strain elastograms.
Song G; Jing L; Yan M; Cong S; Xuejiao W
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Mar; 34(3):395-400. PubMed ID: 25715360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Nonmass enhancement on breast MRI: review of patterns with radiologic-pathologic correlation and discussion of management.
Chadashvili T; Ghosh E; Fein-Zachary V; Mehta TS; Venkataraman S; Dialani V; Slanetz PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 25539260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Breast sonographic elastography using an advanced breast tissue-specific imaging preset: initial clinical results.
Jung HJ; Hahn SY; Choi HY; Park SH; Park HK
J Ultrasound Med; 2012 Feb; 31(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 22298871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Elastography for breast cancer diagnosis: a useful tool for small and BI-RADS 4 lesions.
Liu XJ; Zhu Y; Liu PF; Xu YL
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(24):10739-43. PubMed ID: 25605168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Ultrasound elastography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant cervical lesions.
Lu R; Xiao Y; Liu M; Shi D
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Apr; 33(4):667-71. PubMed ID: 24658946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Background parenchymal signal enhancement ratio at preoperative MR imaging: association with subsequent local recurrence in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ after breast conservation surgery.
Kim SA; Cho N; Ryu EB; Seo M; Bae MS; Chang JM; Moon WK
Radiology; 2014 Mar; 270(3):699-707. PubMed ID: 24126372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Apparent diffusion coefficient in estrogen receptor-positive invasive ductal breast carcinoma: correlations with tumor-stroma ratio.
Ko ES; Han BK; Kim RB; Cho EY; Ahn S; Nam SJ; Ko EY; Shin JH; Hahn SY
Radiology; 2014 Apr; 271(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 24475830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. T1 hyperintense renal lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Kim S; Jain M; Harris AB; Lee VS; Babb JS; Sigmund EE; Rueff LE; Taouli B
Radiology; 2009 Jun; 251(3):796-807. PubMed ID: 19380690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Ultrasound elastography: principles and techniques.
Gennisson JL; Deffieux T; Fink M; Tanter M
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2013 May; 94(5):487-95. PubMed ID: 23619292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Role of elastography in the assessment of breast lesions: preliminary results.
Navarro B; Ubeda B; Vallespí M; Wolf C; Casas L; Browne JL
J Ultrasound Med; 2011 Mar; 30(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 21357553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Diagnostic efficacy of contrast-enhanced sonography by combined qualitative and quantitative analysis in breast lesions: a comparative study with magnetic resonance imaging.
Wang L; Du J; Li FH; Fang H; Hua J; Wan CF
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Oct; 32(10):1805-14. PubMed ID: 24065262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Breast Elastography: How We Do It.
Gkali CA; Chalazonitis AN; Feida E; Sotiropoulou M; Giannos A; Tsigginou A; Dimitrakakis C
Ultrasound Q; 2015 Dec; 31(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 26327432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Elastography as an additional tool in breast sonography. Technical principles and clinical applications].
Rjosk-Dendorfer D; Reichelt A; Clevert DA
Radiologe; 2014 Mar; 54(3):211-6. PubMed ID: 24570107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Evaluation of real-time tissue sono-elastography in the assessment of 214 breast lesions: limitations of this method resulting from different histologic subtypes, tumor size and tumor localization.
Farrokh A; Wojcinski S; Degenhardt F
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2264-71. PubMed ID: 24063962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. US elastography of breast and prostate lesions.
Ginat DT; Destounis SV; Barr RG; Castaneda B; Strang JG; Rubens DJ
Radiographics; 2009 Nov; 29(7):2007-16. PubMed ID: 19926759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [New trends and novel possibilities in the diagnostic imaging of breast cancer].
Bidlek M; Kovács E; Fehér K; Gõdény M
Magy Onkol; 2015 Mar; 59(1):44-55. PubMed ID: 25763913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Improving B mode ultrasound evaluation of breast lesions with real-time ultrasound elastography--a clinical approach.
Tan SM; Teh HS; Mancer JF; Poh WT
Breast; 2008 Jun; 17(3):252-7. PubMed ID: 18054231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Value of MRI sequences for prediction of invasive breast carcinoma size.
Durur-Subasi I; Durur-Karakaya A; Karaman A; Demirci E; Alper F; Yılmazel-Ucar E; Acemoglu H; Akcay MN
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2014 Oct; 58(5):565-8. PubMed ID: 24995834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
