210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25300362)
1. Double metal tibial blocks augmentation in total knee arthroplasty.
Chung KS; Lee JK; Lee HJ; Choi CH
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Jan; 24(1):214-20. PubMed ID: 25300362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Metal block augmentation for bone defects of the medial tibia during primary total knee arthroplasty.
Tsukada S; Wakui M; Matsueda M
J Orthop Surg Res; 2013 Oct; 8():36. PubMed ID: 24139483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Management of tibial bone defects with metal augmentation in primary total knee replacement: a minimum five-year review.
Lee JK; Choi CH
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Nov; 93(11):1493-6. PubMed ID: 22058300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using novel porous metal pillars for tibial bone defects in primary total knee arthroplasty.
Tang Q; Guo S; Deng W; Zhou Y
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 Oct; 24(1):829. PubMed ID: 37864175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lateral tibial plateau autograft in revision surgery for failed medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Cerciello S; Morris BJ; Lustig S; Visonà E; Cerciello G; Corona K; Neyret P
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Mar; 25(3):773-778. PubMed ID: 25906913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Treatment of 10-mm-Deep or Greater Uncontained Tibial Bone Defects in Primary Total Knee Reconstruction without Metal Augmentation: Autologous Oblique Structural Peg Bone and Cancellous Chip Bone Grafting.
Chon JG; Kang JW; Kim CU; Jeong U; Go J
Clin Orthop Surg; 2021 Jun; 13(2):168-174. PubMed ID: 34094007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cone for reconstruction of severe bone loss at the proximal tibia.
Jensen CL; Winther N; Schrøder HM; Petersen MM
Knee; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1233-7. PubMed ID: 25212989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mid-term clinical results of primary total knee arthroplasty using metal block augmentation and stem extension in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Hamai S; Miyahara H; Esaki Y; Hirata G; Terada K; Kobara N; Miyazaki K; Senju T; Iwamoto Y
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Aug; 16():225. PubMed ID: 26307109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty: a five to nine-year follow-up.
Kamath AF; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Feb; 97(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 25653322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Mark Coventry Award: Trabecular metal tibial components were durable and reliable in primary total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial.
Pulido L; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Stuart MJ; Sanchez-Sotelo J; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 473(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 24687433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tibial Tray Thickness Significantly Increases Medial Tibial Bone Resorption in Cobalt-Chromium Total Knee Arthroplasty Implants.
Martin JR; Watts CD; Levy DL; Miner TM; Springer BD; Kim RH
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jan; 32(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 27421584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of stepped porous titanium metaphyseal sleeves for tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: short term results.
Barnett SL; Mayer RR; Gondusky JS; Choi L; Patel JJ; Gorab RS
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1219-24. PubMed ID: 24444570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior-stabilized or constrained condylar prosthesis: a minimum 3-year and average 5-year follow-up study.
Peters CL; Hennessey R; Barden RM; Galante JO; Rosenberg AG
J Arthroplasty; 1997 Dec; 12(8):896-903. PubMed ID: 9458255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Porous metal cones: gold standard for massive bone loss in complex revision knee arthroplasty? A systematic review of current literature.
Divano S; Cavagnaro L; Zanirato A; Basso M; Felli L; Formica M
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2018 Jun; 138(6):851-863. PubMed ID: 29671089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cementless Porous Tantalum Monoblock Tibia vs Cemented Modular Tibia in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.
Hu B; Chen Y; Zhu H; Wu H; Yan S
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):666-674. PubMed ID: 27776898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Uncemented tantalum metal components versus cemented tibial components in total knee arthroplasty: 11- to 15-year outcomes of a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.
Hampton M; Mansoor J; Getty J; Sutton PM
Bone Joint J; 2020 Aug; 102-B(8):1025-1032. PubMed ID: 32731836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Revision total knee arthroplasty using metaphyseal sleeves at short-term follow-up.
Huang R; Barrazueta G; Ong A; Orozco F; Jafari M; Coyle C; Austin M
Orthopedics; 2014 Sep; 37(9):e804-9. PubMed ID: 25350623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preliminary results of managing large medial tibial defects in primary total knee arthroplasty: autogenous morcellised bone graft.
Sugita T; Aizawa T; Miyatake N; Sasaki A; Kamimura M; Takahashi A
Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):931-937. PubMed ID: 27872980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Addressing large tibial osseous defects in primary total knee arthroplasty using porous tantalum cones.
You JS; Wright AR; Hasegawa I; Kobayashi B; Kawahara M; Wang J; Nakasone CK
Knee; 2019 Jan; 26(1):228-239. PubMed ID: 30554910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of autogenous onlay bone graft for uncontained tibial bone defects in primary total knee arthroplasty.
Yoon JR; Seo IW; Shin YS
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Nov; 18(1):502. PubMed ID: 29187180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
