358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25300556)
1. Body packers on your examination table: How helpful are plain x-ray images? A definitive low-dose CT protocol as a diagnosis tool for body packers.
Schulz B; Grossbach A; Gruber-Rouh T; Zangos S; Vogl TJ; Eichler K
Clin Radiol; 2014 Dec; 69(12):e525-30. PubMed ID: 25300556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of diagnostic value of multidetector computed tomography and X-ray in the detection of body packing.
Bulakci M; Kalelioglu T; Bulakci BB; Kiris A
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):1248-54. PubMed ID: 23357250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of ultrasonography in the imaging of body packers comparison with CT: a prospective study.
Cengel F; Bulakci M; Selcuk T; Savas Y; Ceyhan M; Kocak A; Bilgili CO
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Oct; 40(7):2143-51. PubMed ID: 25906342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection of residual packets in cocaine body packers: low accuracy of abdominal radiography-a prospective study.
Rousset P; Chaillot PF; Audureau E; Rey-Salmon C; Becour B; Fitton I; Vadrot D; Revel MP
Eur Radiol; 2013 Aug; 23(8):2146-55. PubMed ID: 23508274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic Evaluation of Radiation Dose Reduction in CT Studies of Body Packers: Accuracy Down to Submillisievert Levels.
Laberke PJ; Blum S; Waelti S; Fornaro J; Hausmann R; Alkadhi H; Leschka S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Apr; 206(4):740-6. PubMed ID: 26866340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Screening of illegal intracorporeal containers ("body packing"): is abdominal radiography sufficiently accurate? A comparative study with low-dose CT.
Poletti PA; Canel L; Becker CD; Wolff H; Elger B; Lock E; Sarasin F; Bonfanti MS; Dupuis-Lozeron E; Perneger T; Platon A
Radiology; 2012 Dec; 265(3):772-9. PubMed ID: 22952384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low-dose computed tomography to detect body-packing in an animal model.
Maurer MH; Niehues SM; Schnapauff D; Grieser C; Rothe JH; Waldmüller D; Chopra SS; Hamm B; Denecke T
Eur J Radiol; 2011 May; 78(2):302-6. PubMed ID: 20889275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Low-dose computed tomography for the detection of cocaine body packs: clinical evaluation and legal issues].
Pache G; Einhaus D; Bulla S; Baumann T; Langer M; Blanke P
Rofo; 2012 Feb; 184(2):122-9. PubMed ID: 22033846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic value of CT-localizer and axial low-dose computed tomography for the detection of drug body packing.
Aissa J; Kohlmeier A; Rubbert C; Hohn U; Blondin D; Schleich C; Kröpil P; Boos J; Antoch G; Miese F
J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Jan; 37():55-60. PubMed ID: 26584226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of abdominal computed tomography with and without oral contrast in diagnosis of body packers and body stuffers.
Shahnazi M; Hassanian-Moghaddam H; Gachkar L; Ahmadi N; Zamani N; Bahrami-Motlagh H; Faghihi Langroudi T; Arjmand Shabestari A; Mohammad Alizadeh A
Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2015; 53(7):596-603. PubMed ID: 26065361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Heroin body packing: clearly discerning drug packets using CT.
Yang RM; Li L; Feng J; Lai SS; Lin BQ; Yu T; Ye XH; Xu YK
South Med J; 2009 May; 102(5):470-5. PubMed ID: 19373152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitivity and Specificity of Emergency Physicians and Trainees for Identifying Internally Concealed Drug Packages on Abdominal Computed Tomography Scan: Do Lung Windows Improve Accuracy?
Asha SE; Cooke A
J Emerg Med; 2015 Sep; 49(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 25934379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. "Drug mules" as a radiological challenge: sensitivity and specificity in identifying internal cocaine in body packers, body pushers and body stuffers by computed tomography, plain radiography and Lodox.
Flach PM; Ross SG; Ampanozi G; Ebert L; Germerott T; Hatch GM; Thali MJ; Patak MA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Oct; 81(10):2518-26. PubMed ID: 22178312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Added value of lung window in detecting drug mules on non-contrast abdominal computed tomography.
Bahrami-Motlagh H; Vakilian F; Hassanian-Moghaddam H; Pourghorban R
Radiol Med; 2016 Jun; 121(6):472-7. PubMed ID: 26830789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensitivity and specificity of CT scanning for determining the number of internally concealed packages in 'body-packers'.
Asha SE; Higham M; Child P
Emerg Med J; 2015 May; 32(5):387-91. PubMed ID: 24554446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computed tomography scout views vs. conventional radiography in body-packers - delineation of body-packs and radiation dose in a porcine model.
Ziegeler E; Grimm JM; Wirth S; Uhl M; Reiser MF; Scherr MK
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):3883-9. PubMed ID: 23017196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Swallowed opium packets: CT diagnosis.
Taheri MS; Hassanian-Moghaddam H; Birang S; Hemadi H; Shahnazi M; Jalali AH; Shakiba M; Nahvi V
Abdom Imaging; 2008; 33(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 17610106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of low dose and standard dose abdominal CT scan in body stuffers.
Bahrami-Motlagh H; Mahboubi-Fooladi Z; Salevatipour B; Hassanian-Moghaddam H; Mirhashemi SH
Clin Toxicol (Phila); 2018 May; 56(5):348-354. PubMed ID: 28905656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Noise insertion in CT for cocaine body packing: where is the limit of extensive dose reduction?
Aissa J; Bölke E; Sawicki LM; Appel E; Thomas C; Heusch P; Sedlmair M; Krzymyk K; Kröpil P; Antoch G; Boos J
Eur J Med Res; 2018 Dec; 23(1):59. PubMed ID: 30526681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimizing radiation exposure in screening of body packing: image quality and diagnostic acceptability of an 80 kVp protocol with automated tube current modulation.
Aissa J; Boos J; Rubbert C; Caspers J; Schleich C; Thomas C; Kröpil P; Antoch G; Miese F
Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2017 Jun; 13(2):145-150. PubMed ID: 28265799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
