207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25300853)
1. Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.).
Kagami H; Kurata M; Matsuhira H; Taguchi K; Mikami T; Tamagake H; Kubo T
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1223():335-47. PubMed ID: 25300853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficient callus formation and plant regeneration are heritable characters in sugar beet (
Kagami H; Taguchi K; Arakawa T; Kuroda Y; Tamagake H; Kubo T
Hereditas; 2016; 153():12. PubMed ID: 28096774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transgenic sugar beet tolerant to imidazolinone obtained by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation.
Kishchenko EM; Komarnitskii IK; Kuchuk NV
Tsitol Genet; 2011; 45(3):20-5. PubMed ID: 21774399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rhizobium radiobacter conjugation and callus-independent shoot regeneration used to introduce the cercosporin export gene cfp from Cercospora into sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.).
Kuykendall LD; Stockett TM; Saunders JW
Biotechnol Lett; 2003 May; 25(9):739-44. PubMed ID: 12882176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Genetic transformation of sugar beet: evolution of theoretical and experimental approaches].
Golovko AE; Dovzhenko AA; Gleba IuIu
Tsitol Genet; 2005; 39(3):30-6. PubMed ID: 16250243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A protocol for sonication-assisted Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation of haploid and diploid sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) explants.
Klimek-Chodacka M; Baranski R
Acta Biochim Pol; 2014; 61(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 24660169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Production of transgenic sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) plants of O-type using Agrobacterium tumefaciens].
Kishchenko OM; Komarnyts'kyĭ IK; Hleba IuIu; Kuchuk MV
Tsitol Genet; 2004; 38(5):3-8. PubMed ID: 15771083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Generation of sugar beet transgenic plants expressing bar gene].
Mishutkina IaV; Kamionskaia AM; Skriabin KG
Prikl Biokhim Mikrobiol; 2010; 46(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 20198924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) morphogenesis in vitro: effects of phytohormone type and concentration in the culture medium, type of explants, and plant genotype on shoot regeneration frequency].
Mishutkina IaV; Gaponenko AK
Genetika; 2006 Feb; 42(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 16583705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik).
Akcay UC; Yücel M; Oktem HA
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1223():265-74. PubMed ID: 25300847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr].
Luth D; Warnberg K; Wang K
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1223():275-84. PubMed ID: 25300848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Plastid transformation in sugar beet: Beta vulgaris.
De Marchis F; Bellucci M
Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1132():367-73. PubMed ID: 24599867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Regeneration and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of the apomictic species Eulaliopsis binata.
Ma K; Hu CG; Xu B; Yao JL
Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2013 Sep; 171(2):543-52. PubMed ID: 23873641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Plastid Transformation in Sugar Beet: An Important Industrial Crop.
De Marchis F; Bellucci M
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2317():283-290. PubMed ID: 34028776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro dual culture of Polymyxa betae in Agrobacterium rhizogenes transformed sugar beet hairy roots in liquid media.
Desoignies N; Legreve A
J Eukaryot Microbiol; 2011; 58(5):424-5. PubMed ID: 21699623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum).
Garcia D; Narváez-Vásquez J; Orozco-Cárdenas ML
Methods Mol Biol; 2015; 1223():349-61. PubMed ID: 25300854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transgenic salt-tolerant sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) constitutively expressing an Arabidopsis thaliana vacuolar Na/H antiporter gene, AtNHX3, accumulates more soluble sugar but less salt in storage roots.
Liu H; Wang Q; Yu M; Zhang Y; Wu Y; Zhang H
Plant Cell Environ; 2008 Sep; 31(9):1325-34. PubMed ID: 18518917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transgene escape in sugar beet production fields: data from six years farm scale monitoring.
Darmency H; Vigouroux Y; Gestat De Garambé T; Richard-Molard M; Muchembled C
Environ Biosafety Res; 2007; 6(3):197-206. PubMed ID: 18001686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetic transformation of carnation (Dianthus caryophylus L.).
Nontaswatsri C; Fukai S
Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 589():87-96. PubMed ID: 20099093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficient transformation and regeneration of fig (Ficus carica L.) via somatic embryogenesis.
Soliman HI; Gabr M; Abdallah NA
GM Crops; 2010; 1(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 21912211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
