These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25301597)

  • 1. U.S. Policy. Congress, NSF spar on access to grant files.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2014 Oct; 346(6206):152-3. PubMed ID: 25301597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Science policy. Peer-review critic gets NIH 'rejects'.
    Malakoff D
    Science; 2001 Nov; 294(5545):1255-7. PubMed ID: 11701895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. U.S. science policy. Report tells NSF to think more boldly.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2007 Mar; 315(5817):1352-3. PubMed ID: 17347421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. U.S. science policy. Bill would set new rules for choosing NSF grants.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2013 May; 340(6132):534. PubMed ID: 23641083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. U.S. Science policy. NSF opening adds to concerns about Obama's second-term science team.
    Mervis J; Malakoff D
    Science; 2013 Feb; 339(6121):746-7. PubMed ID: 23413328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. U.S. science policy. NSF says no to legislator seeking reviewer comments.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2013 May; 340(6135):911. PubMed ID: 23704544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rethinking grant review.
    Nat Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 11(2):119. PubMed ID: 18227790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. U.S. science policy. Peer review not popular at Homeland Security.
    Bhattacharjee Y
    Science; 2009 Nov; 326(5954):779. PubMed ID: 19892948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accountability and transparency.
    Leshner AI
    Science; 2009 Apr; 324(5925):313. PubMed ID: 19372394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biodefense. U.S. agencies unveil plan for biosecurity peer review.
    Couzin J
    Science; 2004 Mar; 303(5664):1595. PubMed ID: 15016970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is any science safe?
    Prewitt K
    Science; 2013 May; 340(6132):525. PubMed ID: 23641078
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. U.S. science policy. Risky business.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2004 Oct; 306(5694):220-1. PubMed ID: 15472055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. 2014 science indicators. New NSF report shows where U.S. leads and lags.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2014 Feb; 343(6172):718. PubMed ID: 24531947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New president, new congress..... new hope for science?
    Wolinetz CD
    Physiologist; 2009 Feb; 52(1):1, 3-5. PubMed ID: 19271423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. U.S. science policy. Proposed change in awarding grants at NSF spurs partisan sniping.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2013 May; 340(6133):670. PubMed ID: 23661731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. U.S. science policy. What it means for agencies to be under the sequester.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2013 Mar; 339(6123):1020-1. PubMed ID: 23449566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. House panel kind to NSF budget but trims some programs.
    Boffey PM
    Science; 1969 May; 164(3880):656. PubMed ID: 5778019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. US seeks to make science free for all.
    Butler D
    Nature; 2010 Apr; 464(7290):822-3. PubMed ID: 20376119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. NIH revises rules of conflict of interest of grant peer reviewers.
    Shalev M
    Lab Anim (NY); 2004 Mar; 33(3):15-6. PubMed ID: 15235618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Science funding. NSF's 'Big Pitch' tests anonymized grant reviews.
    Bhattacharjee Y
    Science; 2012 May; 336(6084):969-70. PubMed ID: 22628627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.