These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25302580)

  • 1. Reliability of corneal dynamic scheimpflug analyser measurements in virgin and post-PRK eyes.
    Chen X; Stojanovic A; Hua Y; Eidet JR; Hu D; Wang J; Utheim TP
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e109577. PubMed ID: 25302580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison between Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry after photorefractive keratectomy.
    Sadigh AL; Fouladi RF; Hashemi H; Beheshtnejad AH
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 251(2):603-8. PubMed ID: 22940796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validity of Tono-pachymetry for Measuring Corrected Intraocular Pressure in Non-surgical and Post-photorefractive Keratectomy Eyes.
    Hahn IK; Kim JY; Kim MJ; Tchah H; Moon CH
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2017 Feb; 31(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 28243023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of accelerated corneal crosslinking combined with transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy on dynamic corneal response parameters and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure measured with a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer in healthy myopic patients.
    Lee H; Roberts CJ; Ambrósio R; Elsheikh A; Kang DSY; Kim TI
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2017 Jul; 43(7):937-945. PubMed ID: 28823441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tono-Pen versus Goldmann tonometry after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy.
    Levy Y; Zadok D; Glovinsky Y; Krakowski D; Nemet P
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1999 Apr; 25(4):486-91. PubMed ID: 10198852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Underestimate of tonometric readings after photorefractive keratectomy increases at higher intraocular pressure levels.
    Tamburrelli C; Giudiceandrea A; Vaiano AS; Caputo CG; Gullà F; Salgarello T
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Sep; 46(9):3208-13. PubMed ID: 16123420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correction of intraocular pressure for changes in central corneal thickness following photorefractive keratectomy.
    Munger R; Hodge WG; Mintsioulis G; Agapitos PJ; Jackson WB; Damji KF
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1998 Apr; 33(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 9606572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of corneal biomechanical properties 25 years after myopic photorefractive keratectomy.
    Özdoğan S; Gürelik G; Bilgihan K
    Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Jan; 43(1):325-331. PubMed ID: 35918497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The relationship between central corneal thickness and Perkins applanation tonometry in rabbits].
    Luan CS; Chen XM; Deng YP; Wang L; Liu DJ; Cui M; Li J
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2005 Jul; 41(7):642-6. PubMed ID: 16080901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of intraocular pressure measurements after myopic excimer photorefractive keratectomy.
    Abbasoglu OE; Bowman RW; Cavanagh HD; McCulley JP
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Dec; 105(12):2193-6. PubMed ID: 9855146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of corneal deformation analyzed with Scheimpflug based device in healthy eyes and diseased ones.
    Lanza M; Cennamo M; Iaccarino S; Irregolare C; Rechichi M; Bifani M; Gironi Carnevale UA
    Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():748671. PubMed ID: 25054144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy on intraocular pressure measurements using the Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Mardelli PG; Piebenga LW; Whitacre MM; Siegmund KD
    Ophthalmology; 1997 Jun; 104(6):945-8; discussion 949. PubMed ID: 9186434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Alterations in intraocular pressure and the CorVis parameters after LASIK].
    Anton A; Neuburger M; Jordan JF; Wecker T; Lübke J; Heinzelmann S; Lapp T; Böhringer D; Reinhard T; Maier P
    Ophthalmologe; 2017 May; 114(5):445-449. PubMed ID: 27620918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK.
    Bao F; Huang W; Zhu R; Lu N; Wang Y; Li H; Wu S; Lin H; Wang J; Zheng X; Huang J; Li Y; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
    Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraocular pressure and photorefractive keratectomy: a comparison of three different tonometers.
    Garzozi HJ; Chung HS; Lang Y; Kagemann L; Harris A
    Cornea; 2001 Jan; 20(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 11189000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Corneal biomechanical characteristics measured by the CorVis Scheimpflug technology in eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma and normal eyes.
    Tian L; Wang D; Wu Y; Meng X; Chen B; Ge M; Huang Y
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):e317-24. PubMed ID: 25639340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In Vivo Prediction of Air-Puff Induced Corneal Deformation Using LASIK, SMILE, and PRK Finite Element Simulations.
    Francis M; Khamar P; Shetty R; Sainani K; Nuijts RMMA; Haex B; Sinha Roy A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2018 Nov; 59(13):5320-5328. PubMed ID: 30398623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variability of Corneal Deformation Response in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes.
    Ye C; Yu M; Lai G; Jhanji V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 Jul; 92(7):e149-53. PubMed ID: 26002009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intraocular Pressure Evaluation after Myopic Refractive Surgery: A Comparison of Methods in 121 Eyes.
    De Bernardo M; Capasso L; Caliendo L; Vosa Y; Rosa N
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2016; 31(3):233-42. PubMed ID: 25334042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Corneal deformation measurement using Scheimpflug noncontact tonometry.
    Hon Y; Lam AK
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 90(1):e1-8. PubMed ID: 23238261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.