These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25303239)

  • 1. Solute diffusion through fibrotic tissue formed around protective cage system for implantable devices.
    Prihandana GS; Ito H; Tanimura K; Yagi H; Hori Y; Soykan O; Sudo R; Miki N
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2015 Aug; 103(6):1180-7. PubMed ID: 25303239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Engineering the tissue which encapsulates subcutaneous implants. I. Diffusion properties.
    Sharkawy AA; Klitzman B; Truskey GA; Reichert WM
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1997 Dec; 37(3):401-12. PubMed ID: 9368145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Polymeric "smart" coatings to prevent foreign body response to implantable biosensors.
    Wang Y; Papadimitrakopoulos F; Burgess DJ
    J Control Release; 2013 Aug; 169(3):341-7. PubMed ID: 23298616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Interspecies differences in systemic drug availability following subcutaneous pulsatile administration in cattle, sheep, dogs, and rats.
    Leppert PS; Cammack L; Cargill R; Coffman L; Cortese M; Engle K; Krupco C; Fix JA
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 Jun; 28(6):713-22. PubMed ID: 8071382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Porous polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel composite prepared and studied initially for biocompatibility].
    Wu JQ; Liu Y; Yang TF; Mu YH; Guo T; Li YB
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2007 Jul; 38(4):705-8, 724. PubMed ID: 17718447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Engineering the tissue which encapsulates subcutaneous implants. II. Plasma-tissue exchange properties.
    Sharkawy AA; Klitzman B; Truskey GA; Reichert WM
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1998 Jun; 40(4):586-97. PubMed ID: 9599035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impregnation of implantable polypropylene mesh with S-nitrosoglutathione-loaded poly(vinyl alcohol).
    Prudente A; Riccetto CL; Simões MM; Pires BM; de Oliveira MG
    Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2013 Aug; 108():178-84. PubMed ID: 23545088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Study of the effects of tissue reactions on the function of implanted glucose sensors.
    Dungel P; Long N; Yu B; Moussy Y; Moussy F
    J Biomed Mater Res A; 2008 Jun; 85(3):699-706. PubMed ID: 17876777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Development of better tolerated prosthetic materials: applications in gynecological surgery].
    Debodinance P; Delporte P; Engrand JB; Boulogne M
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 Oct; 31(6):527-40. PubMed ID: 12407323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bone quality around bioactive silica-based coated stainless steel implants: analysis by micro-Raman, XRF and XAS techniques.
    Ballarre J; Desimone PM; Chorro M; Baca M; Orellano JC; Ceré SM
    J Struct Biol; 2013 Nov; 184(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 24076155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane alters tissue response to implanted Ahmed glaucoma valve.
    DeCroos FC; Ahmad S; Kondo Y; Chow J; Mordes D; Lee MR; Asrani S; Allingham RR; Olbrich KC; Klitzman B
    Curr Eye Res; 2009 Jul; 34(7):562-7. PubMed ID: 19899969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stimulation of implant fixation by parathyroid hormone (1-34)-A histomorphometric comparison of PMMA cement and stainless steel.
    Skripitz R; Böhling S; Rüther W; Aspenberg P
    J Orthop Res; 2005 Nov; 23(6):1266-70. PubMed ID: 15964166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Types I and III collagen in the tissue capsules of titanium and stainless-steel implants.
    Shannon C; Thull R; von Recum A
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1997 Mar; 34(3):401-8. PubMed ID: 9086410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in pelvic organ prolapse mesh mechanical properties following implantation in rats.
    Ulrich D; Edwards SL; Alexander DLJ; Rosamilia A; Werkmeister JA; Gargett CE; Letouzey V
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 214(2):260.e1-260.e8. PubMed ID: 26348376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of microgeometry, implant thickness and polyurethane chemistry on the foreign body response to subcutaneous implants.
    Ward WK; Slobodzian EP; Tiekotter KL; Wood MD
    Biomaterials; 2002 Nov; 23(21):4185-92. PubMed ID: 12194521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Porous Shape-Persistent Organic Cage Compounds of Different Size, Geometry, and Function.
    Mastalerz M
    Acc Chem Res; 2018 Oct; 51(10):2411-2422. PubMed ID: 30203648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biocompatibility study of as-polymerized poly(L-lactide) in rats using a cage implant system.
    Bergsma JE; Rozema FR; Bos RR; Boering G; de Bruijn WC; Pennings AJ
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Feb; 29(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 7738063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using a barbell-shaped cage: a biomechanical comparison.
    Murakami H; Boden SD; Hutton WC
    J Spinal Disord; 2001 Oct; 14(5):385-92. PubMed ID: 11586137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biocompatibility of 17-4 PH stainless steel foam for implant applications.
    Mutlu I; Oktay E
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2011; 21(4):223-33. PubMed ID: 22182790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Engineering the tissue which encapsulates subcutaneous implants. III. Effective tissue response times.
    Sharkawy AA; Klitzman B; Truskey GA; Reichert WM
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1998 Jun; 40(4):598-605. PubMed ID: 9599036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.