418 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25304172)
1. Effects of inter-stimulus interval (ISI) duration on the N1 and P2 components of the auditory event-related potential.
Pereira DR; Cardoso S; Ferreira-Santos F; Fernandes C; Cunha-Reis C; Paiva TO; Almeida PR; Silveira C; Barbosa F; Marques-Teixeira J
Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Dec; 94(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 25304172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Differences in evoked potentials during the active processing of sound location and motion.
Richter N; Schröger E; Rübsamen R
Neuropsychologia; 2013 Jun; 51(7):1204-14. PubMed ID: 23499852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stimulus-to-matching-stimulus interval influences N1, P2, and P3b in an equiprobable Go/NoGo task.
Steiner GZ; Barry RJ; Gonsalvez CJ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Oct; 94(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 25034341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel approach to the physiological measurement of mental workload.
Miller MW; Rietschel JC; McDonald CG; Hatfield BD
Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Apr; 80(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 21320552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Similar sound intensity dependence of the N1 and P2 components of the auditory ERP: Averaged and single trial evidence.
Paiva TO; Almeida PR; Ferreira-Santos F; Vieira JB; Silveira C; Chaves PL; Barbosa F; Marques-Teixeira J
Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Jan; 127(1):499-508. PubMed ID: 26154993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory long latency responses to tonal and speech stimuli.
Swink S; Stuart A
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Apr; 55(2):447-59. PubMed ID: 22199192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Event-related potential and autonomic signs of maladaptive information processing during an auditory oddball task in panic disorder.
Wise V; McFarlane AC; Clark CR; Battersby M
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Oct; 74(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 19607864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Auditory and visual refractory period effects in children and adults: an ERP study.
Coch D; Skendzel W; Neville HJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Sep; 116(9):2184-203. PubMed ID: 16043399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The time course of the amplitude and latency in the auditory late response evoked by repeated tone bursts.
Zhang F; Eliassen J; Anderson J; Scheifele P; Brown D
J Am Acad Audiol; 2009 Apr; 20(4):239-50. PubMed ID: 19927696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cortical auditory evoked potential in aging: effects of stimulus intensity and noise.
Kim JR; Ahn SY; Jeong SW; Kim LS; Park JS; Chung SH; Oh MK
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Sep; 33(7):1105-12. PubMed ID: 22892802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Contribution of spectrotemporal features on auditory event-related potentials elicited by consonant-vowel syllables.
Digeser FM; Wohlberedt T; Hoppe U
Ear Hear; 2009 Dec; 30(6):704-12. PubMed ID: 19672195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sequential processing in an auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task with variable interstimulus interval.
Borchard JP; Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Aug; 97(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 26024616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Event-related potentials in adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: an investigation using an inter-modal auditory/visual oddball task.
Barry RJ; Clarke AR; McCarthy R; Selikowitz M; Brown CR; Heaven PC
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Feb; 71(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 19022305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Stimulus-focused attention speeds up auditory processing.
Folyi T; Fehér B; Horváth J
Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 May; 84(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 22326595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of acute tryptophan depletion on prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle (eyeblink) response and the N1/P2 auditory evoked response in man.
Phillips MA; Oxtoby EK; Langley RW; Bradshaw CM; Szabadi E
J Psychopharmacol; 2000; 14(3):258-65. PubMed ID: 11106305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A method for removing cochlear implant artifact.
Friesen LM; Picton TW
Hear Res; 2010 Jan; 259(1-2):95-106. PubMed ID: 19878712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of temporal stimulus changes on speech-evoked potentials revealed by approximations of tone-evoked waveforms.
Burger M; Hoppe U; Lohscheller J; Eysholdt U; Döllinger M
Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 19050643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Action-sound coincidences suppress evoked responses of the human auditory cortex in EEG and MEG.
Horváth J; Maess B; Baess P; Tóth A
J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Sep; 24(9):1919-31. PubMed ID: 22360594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
