132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25304705)
1. Determining organ dose: the holy grail.
Samei E; Tian X; Segars WP
Pediatr Radiol; 2014 Oct; 44 Suppl 3():460-7. PubMed ID: 25304705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective estimation of organ dose in CT under tube current modulation.
Tian X; Li X; Segars WP; Frush DP; Samei E
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1575-85. PubMed ID: 25832048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Convolution-based estimation of organ dose in tube current modulated CT.
Tian X; Segars WP; Dixon RL; Samei E
Phys Med Biol; 2016 May; 61(10):3935-54. PubMed ID: 27119974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact on CT dose of the variability in tube current modulation technology: a theoretical investigation.
Li X; Segars WP; Samei E
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(16):4525-48. PubMed ID: 25069102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimating lung, breast, and effective dose from low-dose lung cancer screening CT exams with tube current modulation across a range of patient sizes.
Hardy AJ; Bostani M; McMillan K; Zankl M; McCollough C; Cagnon C; McNitt-Gray M
Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):4667-4682. PubMed ID: 30118143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Monte Carlo simulations to assess the effects of tube current modulation on breast dose for multidetector CT.
Angel E; Yaghmai N; Jude CM; Demarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Goldin JG; Primak AN; Stevens DM; Cody DD; McCollough CH; McNitt-Gray MF
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(3):497-512. PubMed ID: 19124953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The feasibility of a scanner-independent technique to estimate organ dose from MDCT scans: using CTDIvol to account for differences between scanners.
Turner AC; Zankl M; DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Zhang D; Angel E; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; McNitt-Gray MF
Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1816-25. PubMed ID: 20443504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of methods to estimate organ doses in CT when utilizing approximations to the tube current modulation function.
Khatonabadi M; Zhang D; Mathieu K; Kim HJ; Lu P; Cody D; Demarco JJ; Cagnon CH; McNitt-Gray MF
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5212-28. PubMed ID: 22894446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of pediatric and adult CT organ dose estimation methods.
Gao Y; Quinn B; Mahmood U; Long D; Erdi Y; St Germain J; Pandit-Taskar N; Xu XG; Bolch WE; Dauer LT
BMC Med Imaging; 2017 Apr; 17(1):28. PubMed ID: 28446130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient-based estimation of organ dose for a population of 58 adult patients across 13 protocol categories.
Sahbaee P; Segars WP; Samei E
Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):072104. PubMed ID: 24989399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Estimating organ doses from tube current modulated CT examinations using a generalized linear model.
Bostani M; McMillan K; Lu P; Kim GH; Cody D; Arbique G; Greenberg SB; DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; McNitt-Gray MF
Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1500-1513. PubMed ID: 28112399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The profound effects of patient arm positioning on organ doses from CT procedures calculated using Monte Carlo simulations and deformable phantoms.
Liu H; Gao Y; Ding A; Caracappa PF; Xu XG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Apr; 164(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 25227436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Organ doses for reference pediatric and adolescent patients undergoing computed tomography estimated by Monte Carlo simulation.
Lee C; Kim KP; Long DJ; Bolch WE
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2129-46. PubMed ID: 22482634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of 1-year-old computational phantom and calculation of organ doses during CT scans using Monte Carlo simulation.
Pan Y; Qiu R; Gao L; Ge C; Zheng J; Xie W; Li J
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Sep; 59(18):5243-60. PubMed ID: 25144385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the use of Monte Carlo-derived dosimetric data in the estimation of patient dose from CT examinations.
Perisinakis K; Tzedakis A; Damilakis J
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):2018-28. PubMed ID: 18561678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of a Monte Carlo model used for simulating tube current modulation in computed tomography over a wide range of phantom conditions/challenges.
Bostani M; McMillan K; DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; McNitt-Gray MF
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):112101. PubMed ID: 25370652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do we need 3D tube current modulation information for accurate organ dosimetry in chest CT? Protocols dose comparisons.
Lopez-Rendon X; Zhang G; Coudyzer W; Develter W; Bosmans H; Zanca F
Eur Radiol; 2017 Nov; 27(11):4490-4497. PubMed ID: 28526893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Automated low-kilovoltage selection in pediatric computed tomography angiography: phantom study evaluating effects on radiation dose and image quality.
Siegel MJ; Ramirez-Giraldo JC; Hildebolt C; Bradley D; Schmidt B
Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):584-9. PubMed ID: 23563195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CT breast dose reduction with the use of breast positioning and organ-based tube current modulation.
Fu W; Tian X; Sturgeon GM; Agasthya G; Segars WP; Goodsitt MM; Kazerooni EA; Samei E
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):665-678. PubMed ID: 28032894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automatic CT simulation optimization for radiation therapy: A general strategy.
Li H; Yu L; Anastasio MA; Chen HC; Tan J; Gay H; Michalski JM; Low DA; Mutic S
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031913. PubMed ID: 24593731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
