These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25304841)

  • 1. Performing and evaluating meta-analyses.
    Burcharth J; Pommergaard HC; Rosenberg J
    Surgery; 2015 Feb; 157(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 25304841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical methods for dealing with publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Jin ZC; Zhou XH; He J
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):343-60. PubMed ID: 25363575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combining heterogenous studies using the random-effects model is a mistake and leads to inconclusive meta-analyses.
    Al Khalaf MM; Thalib L; Doi SA
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Feb; 64(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 20409685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meta-analysis: fact or fiction? How to interpret meta-analyses.
    Huf W; Kalcher K; Pail G; Friedrich ME; Filzmoser P; Kasper S
    World J Biol Psychiatry; 2011 Apr; 12(3):188-200. PubMed ID: 21375365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey.
    Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA
    CMAJ; 2007 Apr; 176(8):1091-6. PubMed ID: 17420491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Updating meta-analyses leads to larger type I errors than publication bias.
    Borm GF; Donders AR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):825-830.e10. PubMed ID: 19136233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Empirical evaluation showed that the Copas selection model provided a useful summary in 80% of meta-analyses.
    Carpenter JR; Schwarzer G; Rücker G; Künstler R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jun; 62(6):624-631.e4. PubMed ID: 19282148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Publication bias in psychological science: prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.
    Ferguson CJ; Brannick MT
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 21787082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Arcsine test for publication bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes.
    Rücker G; Schwarzer G; Carpenter J
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(5):746-63. PubMed ID: 17592831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity.
    Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J; Olkin I
    Stat Med; 2003 Jul; 22(13):2113-26. PubMed ID: 12820277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis.
    Ioannidis JP
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2008 Oct; 14(5):951-7. PubMed ID: 19018930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conducting Meta-Analyses Based on p Values: Reservations and Recommendations for Applying p-Uniform and p-Curve.
    van Aert RC; Wicherts JM; van Assen MA
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2016 Sep; 11(5):713-729. PubMed ID: 27694466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using pseudo-data to correct for publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Bowden J; Thompson JR; Burton P
    Stat Med; 2006 Nov; 25(22):3798-813. PubMed ID: 16382418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Statistical primer: methodology and reporting of meta-analyses.
    Buccheri S; Sodeck GH; Capodanno D
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 Apr; 53(4):708-713. PubMed ID: 29538746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity.
    Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(25):4544-62. PubMed ID: 17476644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry.
    Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 61(10):991-6. PubMed ID: 18538991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating the proportion of studies missing for meta-analysis due to publication bias.
    Formann AK
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):732-9. PubMed ID: 18586577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The implications of publication bias for meta-analysis' other parameter.
    Jackson D
    Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(17):2911-21. PubMed ID: 16345059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Meta-analysis of clinical trials: how to separate the good grain from the chaff].
    Pignon JP
    Bull Cancer; 1999; 86(7-8):697-9. PubMed ID: 10507851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Guide to Conducting a Meta-Analysis.
    Cheung MW; Vijayakumar R
    Neuropsychol Rev; 2016 Jun; 26(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 27209412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.