187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25304960)
1. Construct validity of SF-6D health state utility values in an employed population.
Baxter S; Sanderson K; Venn A; Otahal P; Palmer AJ
Qual Life Res; 2015 Apr; 24(4):851-70. PubMed ID: 25304960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Australian health-related quality of life population norms derived from the SF-6D.
Norman R; Church J; van den Berg B; Goodall S
Aust N Z J Public Health; 2013 Feb; 37(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 23379801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SF-6D population norms for the Hong Kong Chinese general population.
Wong CKH; Mulhern B; Cheng GHL; Lam CLK
Qual Life Res; 2018 Sep; 27(9):2349-2359. PubMed ID: 29797176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differential Psychometric Properties of EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level and Short-Form 6-Dimension Utility Measures in Low Back Pain.
Cheung PWH; Wong CKH; Cheung JPY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Jun; 44(11):E679-E686. PubMed ID: 30475342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of utility measurement using EQ-5D and SF-6D preference-based generic instruments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
Salaffi F; Carotti M; Ciapetti A; Gasparini S; Grassi W
Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2011; 29(4):661-71. PubMed ID: 21813061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D Utility Measures in Symptomatic benign Thyroid Nodules: Acceptability and Psychometric Evaluation.
Wong CKH; Lang BHH; Yu HMS; Lam CLK
Patient; 2017 Aug; 10(4):447-454. PubMed ID: 28224296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An investigation into the empirical validity of the EQ-5D and SF-6D based on hypothetical preferences in a general population.
Petrou S; Hockley C
Health Econ; 2005 Nov; 14(11):1169-89. PubMed ID: 15942981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality of life in cochlear implantees: comparing utility values obtained through the Medical Outcome Study Short-Form Survey-6D and the Health Utility Index Mark 3.
Arnoldner C; Lin VY; Bresler R; Kaider A; Kuthubutheen J; Shipp D; Chen JM
Laryngoscope; 2014 Nov; 124(11):2586-90. PubMed ID: 24536018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The development of a model for translation of the Neck Disability Index to utility scores for cost-utility analysis in cervical disorders.
Richardson SS; Berven S
Spine J; 2012 Jan; 12(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 22209244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The validity of the SF-36 in an Australian National Household Survey: demonstrating the applicability of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey to examination of health inequalities.
Butterworth P; Crosier T
BMC Public Health; 2004 Oct; 4():44. PubMed ID: 15469617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Valuing postoperative recovery: validation of the SF-6D health-state utility.
Lee L; Elfassy N; Li C; Latimer E; Liberman AS; Charlebois P; Stein B; Carli F; Fried GM; Feldman LS
J Surg Res; 2013 Sep; 184(1):108-14. PubMed ID: 23522456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Hidden Toll of Psychological Distress in Australian Adults and Its Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life Measured as Health State Utilities.
Ul Husnain MI; Hajizadeh M; Ahmad H; Khanam R
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2024 Jul; 22(4):583-598. PubMed ID: 38530626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Association between body mass index and health-related quality of life among an Australian sample.
Kortt MA; Dollery B
Clin Ther; 2011 Oct; 33(10):1466-74. PubMed ID: 21924772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of disease severity on EQ-5D and SF-6D utility discrepancies in chronic heart failure.
Kontodimopoulos N; Argiriou M; Theakos N; Niakas D
Eur J Health Econ; 2011 Aug; 12(4):383-91. PubMed ID: 20473544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Baseline comparison of three health utility measures and the feeling thermometer among participants in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes trial.
Raisch DW; Feeney P; Goff DC; Narayan KM; O'Connor PJ; Zhang P; Hire DG; Sullivan MD
Cardiovasc Diabetol; 2012 Jul; 11():35. PubMed ID: 22515638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Catalog and comparison of societal preferences (utilities) for lung cancer health states: results from the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance (CanCORS) study.
Tramontano AC; Schrag DL; Malin JK; Miller MC; Weeks JC; Swan JS; McMahon PM
Med Decis Making; 2015 Apr; 35(3):371-87. PubMed ID: 25670839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of direct-measured and derived short form six dimensions (SF-6D) health preference values among chronic hepatitis B patients.
Wong CK; Lam ET; Lam CL
Qual Life Res; 2013 Dec; 22(10):2973-81. PubMed ID: 23564621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of Reliability and Validity of SF-12v2 among a Diabetic Population.
Kathe N; Hayes CJ; Bhandari NR; Payakachat N
Value Health; 2018 Apr; 21(4):432-440. PubMed ID: 29680100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chilean population norms derived from the health-related quality of Life SF-6D.
Garcia-Gordillo MA; Collado-Mateo D; Olivares PR; Adsuar JC
Eur J Health Econ; 2018 Jun; 19(5):675-686. PubMed ID: 28631248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Construct validity of the Assessment of Quality of Life - 6D (AQoL-6D) in community samples.
Allen J; Inder KJ; Lewin TJ; Attia JR; Kelly BJ
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2013 Apr; 11():61. PubMed ID: 23590808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
