These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Home birth study fails to identify credentials of midwives conducting home birth. Vallee-Pouliot K; Janssen P; Hutton E Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):253-4. PubMed ID: 25446666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Early and total neonatal mortality in relation to birth setting in the United States, 2006-2009. Illuzzi JL; Stapleton SR; Rathbun L Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 212(2):250. PubMed ID: 25305403 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Early and total neonatal mortality in relation to birth setting in the United States, 2006-2009. Grünebaum A; McCullough LB; Sapra KJ; Brent RL; Levene MI; Arabin B; Chervenak FA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Oct; 211(4):390.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24662716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Planned home and hospital births in South Australia, 1991-2006: differences in outcomes. Johnson KC; Daviss BA Med J Aust; 2010 Jun; 192(12):726-7; author reply 727. PubMed ID: 20722097 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Planned home versus planned hospital births: adverse outcomes comparison by reviewing the international literature]. Faucon C; Brillac T Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2013 Jun; 41(6):388-93. PubMed ID: 23769011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Childbirth settings in the US. The Lancet Lancet; 2020 Feb; 395(10224):538. PubMed ID: 32087778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Planned home and hospital births in South Australia, 1991-2006: differences in outcomes. Dahlen HG; Homer CS; Tracy SK; Bisits AM Med J Aust; 2010 Jun; 192(12):726; author reply 727. PubMed ID: 20565361 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Midwifery Provision of Home Birth Services: American College of Nurse-Midwives. American College of Nurse-Midwives J Midwifery Womens Health; 2016; 61(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 26676378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In reply. Cheyney M J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(3):366-7. PubMed ID: 24850287 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Planned homebirth: not a Dutch treat for export. Chervenak FA; McCullough LB; Arabin B; Brent RL; Levene MI; Grünebaum A BJOG; 2015 Apr; 122(5):730. PubMed ID: 25316319 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Outcomes of care for 16,925 planned home births in the United States: the Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project, 2004 to 2009. Wax JR; Pinette MG J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(3):366. PubMed ID: 24850286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Outcomes of care for 16,924 planned home births in the United States: the Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project, 2004 to 2009. Cheyney M; Bovbjerg M; Everson C; Gordon W; Hannibal D; Vedam S J Midwifery Womens Health; 2014; 59(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 24479690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Life-threatening hazards of using "wise women" (midwives). Ideologic reportage becomes a risk factor in pregnancy and childbirth]. Saling E Fortschr Med; 1984 Mar; 102(10):94-5. PubMed ID: 6714898 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Which deliveries should be selected for quality evaluation of out of clinic births]. Loytved C; Wenzlaff P Kinderkrankenschwester; 2012 Jul; 31(7):275-80. PubMed ID: 22876463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. How should we interpret the new Dutch evidence on home birth? Knight M BJOG; 2015 Apr; 122(5):729. PubMed ID: 25377147 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Midwifery: strategies on the road to universal legalization. Hermer LD Health Matrix Clevel; 2003; 13(2):325-69. PubMed ID: 15027424 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]