229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25305758)
1. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the axial trunk rotation: manual versus smartphone-aided measurement tools.
Qiao J; Xu L; Zhu Z; Zhu F; Liu Z; Qian B; Qiu Y
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2014 Oct; 15():343. PubMed ID: 25305758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability analysis of a smartphone-aided measurement method for the Cobb angle of scoliosis.
Qiao J; Liu Z; Xu L; Wu T; Zheng X; Zhu Z; Zhu F; Qian B; Qiu Y
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jun; 25(4):E88-92. PubMed ID: 22237178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validity and reliability of the iPhone to measure rib hump in scoliosis.
Balg F; Juteau M; Theoret C; Svotelis A; Grenier G
J Pediatr Orthop; 2014 Dec; 34(8):774-9. PubMed ID: 24787301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of the smartphone for end vertebra selection in scoliosis.
Pepe M; Kocadal O; Iyigun A; Gunes Z; Aksahin E; Aktekin CN
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2017 Mar; 51(2):146-149. PubMed ID: 28077254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability analysis for digital adolescent idiopathic scoliosis measurements.
Kuklo TR; Potter BK; O'Brien MF; Schroeder TM; Lenke LG; Polly DW;
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2005 Apr; 18(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 15800433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A computer-aided Cobb angle measurement method and its reliability.
Zhang J; Lou E; Shi X; Wang Y; Hill DL; Raso JV; Le LH; Lv L
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):383-7. PubMed ID: 20124919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools.
Gstoettner M; Sekyra K; Walochnik N; Winter P; Wachter R; Bach CM
Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1587-92. PubMed ID: 17549526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variability in Cobb angle measurements using reformatted computerized tomography scans.
Adam CJ; Izatt MT; Harvey JR; Askin GN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(14):1664-9. PubMed ID: 16025038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Practical Study of Diagnostic Accuracy: Scoliosis Screenings of Middle School Students by a Trained Nurse With a Smartphone Versus a Spine Surgeon With a Scoliometer.
Chen C; Yu R; Xu W; Li Z; Li Y; Hu R; Zhu X
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 Mar; 45(5):E266-E271. PubMed ID: 31568349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Relationship Between Apical Vertebral Rotation and Truncal Rotation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Using 3D Reconstructions.
Jankowski PP; Yaszay B; Cidambi KR; Bartley CE; Bastrom TP; Newton PO
Spine Deform; 2018; 6(3):213-219. PubMed ID: 29735128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of manual and digital measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Kuklo TR; Potter BK; Schroeder TM; O'Brien MF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 May; 31(11):1240-6. PubMed ID: 16688038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A reliability and validity study for different coronal angles using ultrasound imaging in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Brink RC; Wijdicks SPJ; Tromp IN; Schlösser TPC; Kruyt MC; Beek FJA; Castelein RM
Spine J; 2018 Jun; 18(6):979-985. PubMed ID: 29056566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An assessment of the reliability of the Scoliometer.
Murrell GA; Coonrad RW; Moorman CT; Fitch RD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 May; 18(6):709-12. PubMed ID: 8516699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of reliability between the Lenke and King classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using radiographs that were not premeasured.
Richards BS; Sucato DJ; Konigsberg DE; Ouellet JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(11):1148-56; discussion 1156-7. PubMed ID: 12782983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intra- and Interobserver Reliability of the Cobb Angle-Vertebral Rotation Angle-Spinous Process Angle for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.
Chan AC; Morrison DG; Nguyen DV; Hill DL; Parent E; Lou EH
Spine Deform; 2014 May; 2(3):168-175. PubMed ID: 27927414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-assisted algorithms improve reliability of King classification and Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis.
Stokes IA; Aronsson DD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Mar; 31(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 16540871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability analysis for manual adolescent idiopathic scoliosis measurements.
Kuklo TR; Potter BK; Polly DW; O'Brien MF; Schroeder TM; Lenke LG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Feb; 30(4):444-54. PubMed ID: 15706343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A study of the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the Scoliometer and Adam's forward bend test.
Côté P; Kreitz BG; Cassidy JD; Dzus AK; Martel J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Apr; 23(7):796-802; discussion 803. PubMed ID: 9563110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of Inter- and Intraobserver Reliability and Accuracy to Evaluate Apical Vertebral Rotation Using Four Methods: An Experimental Study Using a Saw Bone Model.
Marawar SV; Ordway NR; Auston DA; Kurra S; Wang D; Simpson VM; Tallarico RA; Katz DA; Palomino K; Palumbo M; Lavelle WF
Spine Deform; 2019 Jan; 7(1):11-17. PubMed ID: 30587302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The assessment of intraobserver and interobserver error in the measurement of noncongenital scoliosis in children < or = 10 years of age.
Loder RT; Spiegel D; Gutknecht S; Kleist K; Ly T; Mehbod A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Nov; 29(22):2548-53. PubMed ID: 15543072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
