208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25306079)
1. Lying in neuropsychology.
Seron X
Neurophysiol Clin; 2014 Oct; 44(4):389-403. PubMed ID: 25306079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Symptom validity and neuropsychological assessment: a survey of practices and beliefs of neuropsychologists in six European countries.
Dandachi-FitzGerald B; Ponds RW; Merten T
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2013 Dec; 28(8):771-83. PubMed ID: 24047545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deception is different: Negative validity test findings do not provide "evidence" for "good effort".
Chafetz MD
Clin Neuropsychol; 2022 Aug; 36(6):1244-1264. PubMed ID: 33300435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering.
Heilbronner RL; Sweet JJ; Morgan JE; Larrabee GJ; Millis SR;
Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 Sep; 23(7):1093-129. PubMed ID: 19735055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A survey of neuropsychologists' use of validity tests with children and adolescents.
Brooks BL; Ploetz DM; Kirkwood MW
Child Neuropsychol; 2016; 22(8):1001-20. PubMed ID: 26295363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical myths of forensic neuropsychology.
Greiffenstein MF
Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 Feb; 23(2):286-96. PubMed ID: 18609338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethical issues associated with the assessment of exaggeration, poor effort, and malingering.
Iverson GL
Appl Neuropsychol; 2006; 13(2):77-90. PubMed ID: 17009881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A survey of neuropsychologists' beliefs and practices with respect to the assessment of effort.
Sharland MJ; Gfeller JD
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2007 Feb; 22(2):213-23. PubMed ID: 17284353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating constructs represented by symptom validity tests in forensic neuropsychological assessment of traumatic brain injury.
Frederick RI; Bowden SC
J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2009; 24(2):105-22. PubMed ID: 19333066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. False-positive rates associated with the use of multiple performance and symptom validity tests.
Larrabee GJ
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2014 Jun; 29(4):364-73. PubMed ID: 24769887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The malingering factor.
Williams JM
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2011 Apr; 26(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 21345930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Critiquing symptom validity tests for posttraumatic stress disorder: a modification of Hartman's criteria.
Morel KR; Marshman KC
J Anxiety Disord; 2008 Dec; 22(8):1542-50. PubMed ID: 18423958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The residual effect of feigning: how intentional faking may evolve into a less conscious form of symptom reporting.
Merckelbach H; Jelicic M; Pieters M
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2011 Jan; 33(1):131-9. PubMed ID: 20623399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tools for the detection of lying and malingering in the medico-legal interview setting.
Easton S; Akehurst L
Med Leg J; 2011; 79(Pt 3):103-8. PubMed ID: 21908492
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical and conceptual problems in the attribution of malingering in forensic evaluations.
Drob SL; Meehan KB; Waxman SE
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 19297641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Formula: see text]Neuropsychologists' Validity Testing Beliefs and Practices: A Survey of North American Professionals.
Martin PK; Schroeder RW; Odland AP
Clin Neuropsychol; 2015; 29(6):741-76. PubMed ID: 26390099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ethics, Malingering, and a lie-detector at the bedside.
Candilis PJ
J Forensic Sci; 1998 May; 43(3):609-12. PubMed ID: 9608697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Distinguishing between neuropsychological malingering and exaggerated psychiatric symptoms in a neuropsychological setting.
Ruocco AC; Swirsky-Sacchetti T; Chute DL; Mandel S; Platek SM; Zillmer EA
Clin Neuropsychol; 2008 May; 22(3):547-64. PubMed ID: 17853126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of motivation, coaching, and knowledge of neuropsychology on the simulated malingering of head injury.
Erdal K
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2004 Jan; 19(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 14670381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of specific malingering measures in a Spanish sample.
Vilar-López R; Gómez-Río M; Caracuel-Romero A; Llamas-Elvira J; Pérez-García M
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2008 Aug; 30(6):710-22. PubMed ID: 18612877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
