133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25308097)
21. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: I. Simulations.
Schabel MC; Fluckiger JU; DiBella EV
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4783-806. PubMed ID: 20679691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. In vivo quantification of contrast agent concentration using the induced magnetic field for time-resolved arterial input function measurement with MRI.
de Rochefort L; Nguyen T; Brown R; Spincemaille P; Choi G; Weinsaft J; Prince MR; Wang Y
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5328-39. PubMed ID: 19175092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Algorithms for calculation of kinetic parameters from T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Horsfield MA; Morgan B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Oct; 20(4):723-9. PubMed ID: 15390235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Intraindividual in vivo comparison of gadolinium contrast agents for pharmacokinetic analysis using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Liang J; Sammet S; Yang X; Jia G; Takayama Y; Knopp MV
Invest Radiol; 2010 May; 45(5):233-44. PubMed ID: 20351653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Arterial input function calculation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: an in vivo validation study using co-registered contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.
Mehrabian H; Chandrana C; Pang I; Chopra R; Martel AL
Eur Radiol; 2012 Aug; 22(8):1735-47. PubMed ID: 22752523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Interindividual variability of arterial impulse response to intravenous injection of nonionic contrast agent (Iohexol) in DCE-CT study.
Kim SM; Haider MA; Milosevic M; Yeung IW
Med Phys; 2009 Oct; 36(10):4791-802. PubMed ID: 19928109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. On the scope and interpretation of the Tofts models for DCE-MRI.
Sourbron SP; Buckley DL
Magn Reson Med; 2011 Sep; 66(3):735-45. PubMed ID: 21384424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Blind estimation of the arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using purity maximization.
Lin YC; Chan TH; Chi CY; Ng SH; Liu HL; Wei KC; Wai YY; Wang CC; Wang JJ
Magn Reson Med; 2012 Nov; 68(5):1439-49. PubMed ID: 22383386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. T1 measurement of flowing blood and arterial input function determination for quantitative 3D T1-weighted DCE-MRI.
Cheng HL
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 May; 25(5):1073-8. PubMed ID: 17410576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Improved bolus arrival time and arterial input function estimation for tracer kinetic analysis in DCE-MRI.
Singh A; Rathore RK; Haris M; Verma SK; Husain N; Gupta RK
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jan; 29(1):166-76. PubMed ID: 19097111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Estimating the arterial input function using two reference tissues in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI studies: fundamental concepts and simulations.
Yang C; Karczmar GS; Medved M; Stadler WM
Magn Reson Med; 2004 Nov; 52(5):1110-7. PubMed ID: 15508148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. An extended vascular model for less biased estimation of permeability parameters in DCE-T1 images.
Nejad-Davarani SP; Bagher-Ebadian H; Ewing JR; Noll DC; Mikkelsen T; Chopp M; Jiang Q
NMR Biomed; 2017 Jun; 30(6):. PubMed ID: 28211961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Selection of Fitting Model and Arterial Input Function for Repeatability in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Prostate MRI.
Peled S; Vangel M; Kikinis R; Tempany CM; Fennessy FM; Fedorov A
Acad Radiol; 2019 Sep; 26(9):e241-e251. PubMed ID: 30467073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Semi-parametric arterial input functions for quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in mice.
Taxt T; Reed RK; Pavlin T; Rygh CB; Andersen E; Jiřík R
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Feb; 46():10-20. PubMed ID: 29066294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. DCE-MRI pixel-by-pixel quantitative curve pattern analysis and its application to osteosarcoma.
Guo JY; Reddick WE
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Jul; 30(1):177-84. PubMed ID: 19557806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Temporal sampling requirements for the tracer kinetics modeling of breast disease.
Henderson E; Rutt BK; Lee TY
Magn Reson Imaging; 1998 Nov; 16(9):1057-73. PubMed ID: 9839990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The use of error-category mapping in pharmacokinetic model analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data.
Gill AB; Anandappa G; Patterson AJ; Priest AN; Graves MJ; Janowitz T; Jodrell DI; Eisen T; Lomas DJ
Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Feb; 33(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 25460333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Subcompartmentalization of extracellular extravascular space (EES) into permeability and leaky space with local arterial input function (AIF) results in improved discrimination between high- and low-grade glioma using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI.
Sahoo P; Rathore RK; Awasthi R; Roy B; Verma S; Rathore D; Behari S; Husain M; Husain N; Pandey CM; Mohakud S; Gupta RK
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Sep; 38(3):677-88. PubMed ID: 23390002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of temporal sampling on quantitative pharmacokinetic and three-time-point analysis of breast DCE-MRI.
Fluckiger JU; Schabel MC; Dibella EV
Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Sep; 30(7):934-43. PubMed ID: 22513074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Quantitative analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images based on Bayesian P-splines.
Schmid VJ; Whitcher B; Padhani AR; Yang GZ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Jun; 28(6):789-98. PubMed ID: 19272996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
