These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25309495)
1. Does complexity matter? Meta-analysis of learner performance in artificial grammar tasks. Schiff R; Katan P Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1084. PubMed ID: 25309495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of children with developmental dyslexia on high and low topological entropy artificial grammar learning task. Katan P; Kahta S; Sasson A; Schiff R Ann Dyslexia; 2017 Jul; 67(2):163-179. PubMed ID: 27761876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An entropy model for artificial grammar learning. Pothos EM Front Psychol; 2010; 1():16. PubMed ID: 21607072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Using dual-task methodology to dissociate automatic from nonautomatic processes involved in artificial grammar learning. Hendricks MA; Conway CM; Kellogg RT J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1491-500. PubMed ID: 23627281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of chunk strength on the performance of children with developmental dyslexia on artificial grammar learning task may be related to complexity. Schiff R; Katan P; Sasson A; Kahta S Ann Dyslexia; 2017 Jul; 67(2):180-199. PubMed ID: 28409401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. AGL StimSelect: software for automated selection of stimuli for artificial grammar learning. Bailey TM; Pothos EM Behav Res Methods; 2008 Feb; 40(1):164-76. PubMed ID: 18411539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Role of Simple Semantics in the Process of Artificial Grammar Learning. Öttl B; Jäger G; Kaup B J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Oct; 46(5):1285-1308. PubMed ID: 28484966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Instance theory predicts categorization decisions in the absence of categorical structure: A computational analysis of artificial grammar learning without a grammar. Curtis ET; Lebek I Mem Cognit; 2024 Jan; 52(1):132-145. PubMed ID: 37568044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Behavioral and Imaging Studies of Infant Artificial Grammar Learning. Gervain J; de la Cruz-Pavía I; Gerken L Top Cogn Sci; 2020 Jul; 12(3):815-827. PubMed ID: 30554481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implicit learning of two artificial grammars. Guillemin C; Tillmann B Cogn Process; 2021 Feb; 22(1):141-150. PubMed ID: 33021732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. ENIGMA: A Web Application for Running Online Artificial Grammar Learning Experiments. Chen TY J Psycholinguist Res; 2024 Apr; 53(3):38. PubMed ID: 38656669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Correction to: Effects of grammar complexity on artificial grammar learning. Van den Bos E; Poletiek FH Mem Cognit; 2019 Nov; 47(8):1619-1620. PubMed ID: 31215013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Auditory artificial grammar learning in macaque and marmoset monkeys. Wilson B; Slater H; Kikuchi Y; Milne AE; Marslen-Wilson WD; Smith K; Petkov CI J Neurosci; 2013 Nov; 33(48):18825-35. PubMed ID: 24285889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Artificial grammar learning in individuals with severe aphasia. Zimmerer VC; Cowell PE; Varley RA Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 53():25-38. PubMed ID: 24184437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]