These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25309495)

  • 1. Does complexity matter? Meta-analysis of learner performance in artificial grammar tasks.
    Schiff R; Katan P
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1084. PubMed ID: 25309495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of children with developmental dyslexia on high and low topological entropy artificial grammar learning task.
    Katan P; Kahta S; Sasson A; Schiff R
    Ann Dyslexia; 2017 Jul; 67(2):163-179. PubMed ID: 27761876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An entropy model for artificial grammar learning.
    Pothos EM
    Front Psychol; 2010; 1():16. PubMed ID: 21607072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using dual-task methodology to dissociate automatic from nonautomatic processes involved in artificial grammar learning.
    Hendricks MA; Conway CM; Kellogg RT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1491-500. PubMed ID: 23627281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. AGSuite: Software to conduct feature analysis of artificial grammar learning performance.
    Cook MT; Chubala CM; Jamieson RK
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Oct; 49(5):1639-1651. PubMed ID: 28597235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of chunk strength on the performance of children with developmental dyslexia on artificial grammar learning task may be related to complexity.
    Schiff R; Katan P; Sasson A; Kahta S
    Ann Dyslexia; 2017 Jul; 67(2):180-199. PubMed ID: 28409401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. AGL StimSelect: software for automated selection of stimuli for artificial grammar learning.
    Bailey TM; Pothos EM
    Behav Res Methods; 2008 Feb; 40(1):164-76. PubMed ID: 18411539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Role of Simple Semantics in the Process of Artificial Grammar Learning.
    Öttl B; Jäger G; Kaup B
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Oct; 46(5):1285-1308. PubMed ID: 28484966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Instance theory predicts categorization decisions in the absence of categorical structure: A computational analysis of artificial grammar learning without a grammar.
    Curtis ET; Lebek I
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Jan; 52(1):132-145. PubMed ID: 37568044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Behavioral and Imaging Studies of Infant Artificial Grammar Learning.
    Gervain J; de la Cruz-Pavía I; Gerken L
    Top Cogn Sci; 2020 Jul; 12(3):815-827. PubMed ID: 30554481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural correlates of artificial grammar learning.
    Skosnik PD; Mirza F; Gitelman DR; Parrish TB; Mesulam MM; Reber PJ
    Neuroimage; 2002 Nov; 17(3):1306-14. PubMed ID: 12414270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring Variation Between Artificial Grammar Learning Experiments: Outlining a Meta-Analysis Approach.
    Trotter AS; Monaghan P; Beckers GJL; Christiansen MH
    Top Cogn Sci; 2020 Jul; 12(3):875-893. PubMed ID: 31495072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Syntactic transfer in artificial grammar learning.
    Beesley T; Wills AJ; Le Pelley ME
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2010 Feb; 17(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 20081172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Artificial grammar learning in Alzheimer's disease.
    Reber PJ; Martinez LA; Weintraub S
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2003 Jun; 3(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 12943329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implicit learning of two artificial grammars.
    Guillemin C; Tillmann B
    Cogn Process; 2021 Feb; 22(1):141-150. PubMed ID: 33021732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ENIGMA: A Web Application for Running Online Artificial Grammar Learning Experiments.
    Chen TY
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2024 Apr; 53(3):38. PubMed ID: 38656669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correction to: Effects of grammar complexity on artificial grammar learning.
    Van den Bos E; Poletiek FH
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Nov; 47(8):1619-1620. PubMed ID: 31215013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Auditory artificial grammar learning in macaque and marmoset monkeys.
    Wilson B; Slater H; Kikuchi Y; Milne AE; Marslen-Wilson WD; Smith K; Petkov CI
    J Neurosci; 2013 Nov; 33(48):18825-35. PubMed ID: 24285889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Artificial grammar learning in individuals with severe aphasia.
    Zimmerer VC; Cowell PE; Varley RA
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 53():25-38. PubMed ID: 24184437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surface features can deeply affect artificial grammar learning.
    Jiménez L; Mendes Oliveira H; Soares AP
    Conscious Cogn; 2020 Apr; 80():102919. PubMed ID: 32200204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.