These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25310052)
1. Judicial, legislative, and professional attempts to restrict pregnant women's autonomy. Macklin R Virtual Mentor; 2014 Oct; 16(10):827-34. PubMed ID: 25310052 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion counselling and the 1995 German abortion law. Funk N Conn J Int Law; 1996; 12(1):33-65. PubMed ID: 16506337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Emerging notions of women's rights and responsibilities during gestation. Blank RH J Leg Med; 1986 Dec; 7(4):441-69. PubMed ID: 3492583 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Morgentaler judgment: constitutional rights, legislative intention, and institutional design. Weinrib LE Univ Tor Law J; 1992; 42(1):22-76. PubMed ID: 11656266 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Future fear: prenatal duties imposed by private parties. Solomon RI Am J Law Med; 1991; 17(4):411-34. PubMed ID: 1812768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cesareans and Samaritans. Rhoden NK Law Med Health Care; 1987; 15(3):118-25. PubMed ID: 3695574 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. On "bringing on the menses": the criminal liability of women and the therapeutic exception in Canadian abortion law. Gavigan SA Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):279-312. PubMed ID: 11651093 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Criminalization of pregnant women with substance use disorders. Nurs Womens Health; 2015; 19(1):93-95. PubMed ID: 25690823 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Freedom of conscience, professional responsibility, and access to abortion. Dresser RS J Law Med Ethics; 1994; 22(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 7749485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 'Fathers'' foetuses and abortion decision-making: the reproduction of maternal ideology in Canadian judicial discourse. Fegan EV Soc Leg Stud; 1996 Mar; 5(1):75-93. PubMed ID: 11658110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right. Benshoof J Womens Health Issues; 1993; 3(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 8274872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion, asking the rights question? McMahon JA Law Rev; 1988 Aug; 18(3):201-20. PubMed ID: 11655984 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Subject only to the attitude of the surgeon concerned: the judicial protection of medical discretion. Sheldon S Soc Leg Stud; 1996 Mar; 5(1):95-112. PubMed ID: 11658111 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Moral sentiment in judicial opinions on abortion. Moore EN Santa Clara Lawyer; 1975; 15(3):591-634. PubMed ID: 11663584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A new threat to pregnant women's autonomy. Johnsen D Hastings Cent Rep; 1987; 17(4):33-40. PubMed ID: 3667248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion law around the world: progress and pushback. Finer L; Fine JB Am J Public Health; 2013 Apr; 103(4):585-9. PubMed ID: 23409915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Morgentaler v. The Queen in the Supreme Court of Canada. Martin SL Can J Women Law; 1987-1988; 2(2):422-31. PubMed ID: 17076040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Relationship, particularity, and change: reflections on R. v. Morgentaler and feminist approaches to liberty. Lessard H McGill Law J; 1991 Apr; 36(2):263-307. PubMed ID: 11659529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The inadequacies of Australian abortion law. Cica N Aust J Fam Law; 1991 Mar; 5(1):37-68. PubMed ID: 11656112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]