498 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25310387)
1. Biomechanical evaluation of the pedicle screw insertion depth effect on screw stability under cyclic loading and subsequent pullout.
Karami KJ; Buckenmeyer LE; Kiapour AM; Kelkar PS; Goel VK; Demetropoulos CK; Soo TM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Apr; 28(3):E133-9. PubMed ID: 25310387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of the degree of osteoporosis on the biomechanical anchoring strength of the sacral pedicle screws: an in vitro comparison between unaugmented bicortical screws and polymethylmethacrylate augmented unicortical screws.
Zhuang XM; Yu BS; Zheng ZM; Zhang JF; Lu WW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Sep; 35(19):E925-31. PubMed ID: 20098349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of the screw augmentation technique and a diameter increase on pedicle screw fixation in the osteoporotic spine: pullout versus fatigue testing.
Kueny RA; Kolb JP; Lehmann W; Püschel K; Morlock MM; Huber G
Eur Spine J; 2014 Oct; 23(10):2196-202. PubMed ID: 25082759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical Fixation Properties of the Cortical Bone Trajectory in the Osteoporotic Lumbar Spine.
Li HM; Zhang RJ; Gao H; Jia CY; Xing T; Zhang JX; Dong FL; Shen CL
World Neurosurg; 2018 Nov; 119():e717-e727. PubMed ID: 30092463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of iliac screw insertion depth on the stability and strength of lumbo-iliac fixation constructs: an anatomical and biomechanical study.
Zheng ZM; Yu BS; Chen H; Aladin DM; Zhang KB; Zhang JF; Liu H; Luk KD; Lu WW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(16):E565-72. PubMed ID: 19770599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Krag versus Caudad trajectory technique for pedicle screw insertion in osteoporotic vertebrae: biomechanical comparison and analysis.
Yuan Q; Han X; Han X; He D; Liu B; Tian W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Dec; 39(26 Spec No.):B27-35. PubMed ID: 25504099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw thread differential design in an osteoporotic cadaver model.
Mehta H; Santos E; Ledonio C; Sembrano J; Ellingson A; Pare P; Murrell B; Nuckley DJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Mar; 27(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 22071427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical fixation properties of cortical versus transpedicular screws in the osteoporotic lumbar spine: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Sansur CA; Caffes NM; Ibrahimi DM; Pratt NL; Lewis EM; Murgatroyd AA; Cunningham BW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Oct; 25(4):467-476. PubMed ID: 27176113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical properties of pedicle screw fixation augmented with allograft bone particles in osteoporotic vertebrae: different sizes and amounts.
Jia C; Zhang R; Xing T; Gao H; Li H; Dong F; Zhang J; Ge P; Song P; Xu P; Zhang H; Shen C
Spine J; 2019 Aug; 19(8):1443-1452. PubMed ID: 31009768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adjustment of suboptimally placed lumbar pedicle screws decreases pullout strength and alters biomechanics of the construct: a pilot cadaveric study.
Wadhwa RK; Thakur JD; Khan IS; James J; Ahmed O; Zhang S; Henderson B; Ogden A; Guthikonda B; Nanda A
World Neurosurg; 2015 Mar; 83(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 24793978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pedicle screw insertion angle and pullout strength: comparison of 2 proposed strategies.
Inceoğlu S; Montgomery WH; St Clair S; McLain RF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):670-6. PubMed ID: 21388287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical performance of bicortical versus pericortical bone trajectory (CBT) pedicle screws.
Spirig JM; Winkler E; Cornaz F; Fasser MR; Betz M; Snedeker JG; Widmer J; Farshad M
Eur Spine J; 2021 Aug; 30(8):2292-2300. PubMed ID: 34057540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screws in osteoporotic bone with bioactive cement augmentation using simulated in vivo multicomponent loading.
Choma TJ; Frevert WF; Carson WL; Waters NP; Pfeiffer FM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Mar; 36(6):454-62. PubMed ID: 20881517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. C1 pedicle screws versus C1 lateral mass screws: comparisons of pullout strengths and biomechanical stabilities.
Ma XY; Yin QS; Wu ZH; Xia H; Liu JF; Xiang M; Zhao WD; Zhong SZ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Feb; 34(4):371-7. PubMed ID: 19214096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A stronger bicortical sacral pedicle screw fixation through the s1 endplate: an in vitro cyclic loading and pull-out force evaluation.
Luk KD; Chen L; Lu WW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Mar; 30(5):525-9. PubMed ID: 15738784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A titanium expandable pedicle screw improves initial pullout strength as compared with standard pedicle screws.
Vishnubhotla S; McGarry WB; Mahar AT; Gelb DE
Spine J; 2011 Aug; 11(8):777-81. PubMed ID: 21802996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cortical screws used to rescue failed lumbar pedicle screw construct: a biomechanical analysis.
Calvert GC; Lawrence BD; Abtahi AM; Bachus KN; Brodke DS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Feb; 22(2):166-72. PubMed ID: 25478820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical Investigation of a Novel Revision Device in an Osteoporotic Model: Pullout Strength of Pedicle Screw Anchor Versus Larger Screw Diameter.
Manon J; Hussain MM; Harris J; Moldavsky M; La Marca F; Bucklen BS
Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Jul; 30(6):265-271. PubMed ID: 28632549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
