BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25310420)

  • 1. Cardiovascular MR imaging at 3 T: opportunities, challenges, and solutions.
    Rajiah P; Bolen MA
    Radiographics; 2014 Oct; 34(6):1612-35. PubMed ID: 25310420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cardiac MRI of ischemic heart disease at 3 T: potential and challenges.
    Wieben O; Francois C; Reeder SB
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 18077119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Benefits and challenges in bowel MR imaging at 3.0 T.
    Herrmann KA; Paspulati RM; Lauenstein T; Reiser MF
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 21(3):165-75. PubMed ID: 21847036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Body MR imaging at 3.0 T: understanding the opportunities and challenges.
    Barth MM; Smith MP; Pedrosa I; Lenkinski RE; Rofsky NM
    Radiographics; 2007; 27(5):1445-62; discussion 1462-4. PubMed ID: 17848702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 3.0-T MR imaging of the abdomen: comparison with 1.5 T.
    Chang KJ; Kamel IR; Macura KJ; Bluemke DA
    Radiographics; 2008; 28(7):1983-98. PubMed ID: 19001653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abdominal MR imaging at 3T.
    Merkle EM; Dale BM; Paulson EK
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 2006 Feb; 14(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 16530632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrast-enhanced first-pass myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging with parallel acquisition at 3.0 Tesla.
    Ruan C; Yang SH; Cusi K; Gao F; Clarke GD
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Jun; 42(6):352-60. PubMed ID: 17507805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Brain MR imaging at ultra-low radiofrequency power.
    Sarkar SN; Alsop DC; Madhuranthakam AJ; Busse RF; Robson PM; Rofsky NM; Hackney DB
    Radiology; 2011 May; 259(2):550-7. PubMed ID: 21357520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving SNR and B1 transmit field for an endorectal coil in 7 T MRI and MRS of prostate cancer.
    Arteaga de Castro CS; van den Bergen B; Luijten PR; van der Heide UA; van Vulpen M; Klomp DW
    Magn Reson Med; 2012 Jul; 68(1):311-8. PubMed ID: 22127763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 3.0-T functional brain imaging: a 5-year experience.
    Scarabino T; Giannatempo GM; Popolizio T; Tosetti M; d'Alesio V; Esposito F; Di Salle F; Di Costanzo A; Bertolino A; Maggialetti A; Salvolini U
    Radiol Med; 2007 Feb; 112(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 17310287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Theoretical signal-to-noise ratio and spatial resolution dependence on the magnetic field strength for hyperpolarized noble gas magnetic resonance imaging of human lungs.
    Parra-Robles J; Cross AR; Santyr GE
    Med Phys; 2005 Jan; 32(1):221-9. PubMed ID: 15719973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dual-source radiofrequency transmission with patient-adaptive local radiofrequency shimming for 3.0-T cardiac MR imaging: initial experience.
    Mueller A; Kouwenhoven M; Naehle CP; Gieseke J; Strach K; Willinek WA; Schild HH; Thomas D
    Radiology; 2012 Apr; 263(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 22371610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abdominal MR imaging at 3.0 T.
    Akisik FM; Sandrasegaran K; Aisen AM; Lin C; Lall C
    Radiographics; 2007; 27(5):1433-44; discussion 1462-4. PubMed ID: 17848701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Body and cardiovascular MR imaging at 3.0 T.
    Lee VS; Hecht EM; Taouli B; Chen Q; Prince K; Oesingmann N
    Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):692-705. PubMed ID: 17709825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of myocardial viability using delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla.
    Klumpp B; Fenchel M; Hoevelborn T; Helber U; Scheule A; Claussen C; Miller S
    Invest Radiol; 2006 Sep; 41(9):661-7. PubMed ID: 16896300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimizing cardiac MR imaging: practical remedies for artifacts.
    Saremi F; Grizzard JD; Kim RJ
    Radiographics; 2008; 28(4):1161-87. PubMed ID: 18635635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of 3.0-T MR imaging for evaluation of the abdomen.
    Erturk SM; Alberich-Bayarri A; Herrmann KA; Marti-Bonmati L; Ros PR
    Radiographics; 2009 Oct; 29(6):1547-63. PubMed ID: 19959507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Body MR Imaging: Artifacts, k-Space, and Solutions.
    Huang SY; Seethamraju RT; Patel P; Hahn PF; Kirsch JE; Guimaraes AR
    Radiographics; 2015; 35(5):1439-60. PubMed ID: 26207581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic contrast-enhanced renal MRI at 7 Tesla: preliminary results.
    Umutlu L; Kraff O; Orzada S; Fischer A; Kinner S; Maderwald S; Antoch G; Quick HH; Forsting M; Ladd ME; Lauenstein TC
    Invest Radiol; 2011 Jul; 46(7):425-33. PubMed ID: 21317791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abdominal magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T: problem or a promise for the future?
    Hussain SM; Wielopolski PA; Martin DR
    Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Jul; 16(4):325-35. PubMed ID: 16785848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.