These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25310420)
21. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T. Fenchel M; Kramer U; Nael K; Miller S Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Apr; 18(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 17621223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. MRI of the Musculoskeletal System: Advanced Applications using High and Ultrahigh Field MRI. Alizai H; Chang G; Regatte RR Semin Musculoskelet Radiol; 2015 Sep; 19(4):363-74. PubMed ID: 26583364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Abdominal applications of 3.0-T MR imaging: comparative review versus a 1.5-T system. Choi JY; Kim MJ; Chung YE; Kim JY; Jones AC; de Becker J; van Cauteren M Radiographics; 2008; 28(4):e30. PubMed ID: 18426969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Image Artifact Management for Clinical Magnetic Resonance Imaging on a 7 T Scanner Using Single-Channel Radiofrequency Transmit Mode. Fagan AJ; Welker KM; Amrami KK; Frick MA; Watson RE; Kollasch P; Chebrolu V; Felmlee JP Invest Radiol; 2019 Dec; 54(12):781-791. PubMed ID: 31503079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Water excitation as an alternative to fat saturation in MR imaging: preliminary results in musculoskeletal imaging. Hauger O; Dumont E; Chateil JF; Moinard M; Diard F Radiology; 2002 Sep; 224(3):657-63. PubMed ID: 12202695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An image-based approach to understanding the physics of MR artifacts. Morelli JN; Runge VM; Ai F; Attenberger U; Vu L; Schmeets SH; Nitz WR; Kirsch JE Radiographics; 2011; 31(3):849-66. PubMed ID: 21571661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. 7 T renal MRI: challenges and promises. de Boer A; Hoogduin JM; Blankestijn PJ; Li X; Luijten PR; Metzger GJ; Raaijmakers AJ; Umutlu L; Visser F; Leiner T MAGMA; 2016 Jun; 29(3):417-33. PubMed ID: 27008461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. MR imaging of epilepsy: state of the art at 1.5 T and potential of 3 T. Briellmann RS; Pell GS; Wellard RM; Mitchell LA; Abbott DF; Jackson GD Epileptic Disord; 2003 Mar; 5(1):3-20. PubMed ID: 12773291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of three accelerated pulse sequences for semiquantitative myocardial perfusion imaging using sensitivity encoding incorporating temporal filtering (TSENSE). Weber S; Kronfeld A; Kunz RP; Fiebich M; Horstick G; Kreitner KF; Schreiber WG J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(3):569-79. PubMed ID: 17685447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Steady-state free precession MR imaging: improved myocardial tag persistence and signal-to-noise ratio for analysis of myocardial motion. Markl M; Reeder SB; Chan FP; Alley MT; Herfkens RJ; Pelc NJ Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):852-61. PubMed ID: 14990847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Molecular magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial perfusion with EP-3600, a collagen-specific contrast agent: initial feasibility study in a swine model. Spuentrup E; Ruhl KM; Botnar RM; Wiethoff AJ; Buhl A; Jacques V; Greenfield MT; Krombach GA; Günther RW; Vangel MG; Caravan P Circulation; 2009 Apr; 119(13):1768-75. PubMed ID: 19307474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Feasibility of cardiac gating free of interference with electro-magnetic fields at 1.5 Tesla, 3.0 Tesla and 7.0 Tesla using an MR-stethoscope. Frauenrath T; Hezel F; Heinrichs U; Kozerke S; Utting JF; Kob M; Butenweg C; Boesiger P; Niendorf T Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):539-47. PubMed ID: 19652614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Dose response of the intravascular contrast agent gadofosveset trisodium in MR perfusion imaging of the myocardium using semiquantitative evaluation. Niedermayer S; Prompona M; Cyran CC; Reiser M; Huber A J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jan; 39(1):203-10. PubMed ID: 24123355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dual-source parallel radiofrequency excitation body MR imaging compared with standard MR imaging at 3.0 T: initial clinical experience. Willinek WA; Gieseke J; Kukuk GM; Nelles M; König R; Morakkabati-Spitz N; Träber F; Thomas D; Kuhl CK; Schild HH Radiology; 2010 Sep; 256(3):966-75. PubMed ID: 20720078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. High permittivity pads reduce specific absorption rate, improve B1 homogeneity, and increase contrast-to-noise ratio for functional cardiac MRI at 3 T. Brink WM; Webb AG Magn Reson Med; 2014 Apr; 71(4):1632-40. PubMed ID: 23661547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]