195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25311201)
21. Interpretation of automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) with and without knowledge of mammography: a reader performance study.
Skaane P; Gullien R; Eben EB; Sandhaug M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Stoeblen F
Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):404-12. PubMed ID: 24682405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Automated breast ultrasound compared to hand-held ultrasound in surveillance after breast-conserving surgery.
Depretto C; Liguori A; Primolevo A; Di Cosimo S; Cartia F; Ferranti C; Scaperrotta GP
Tumori; 2021 Apr; 107(2):132-138. PubMed ID: 32552398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Inter-rater reliability and double reading analysis of an automated three-dimensional breast ultrasound system: comparison of two independent examiners.
Maier A; Heil J; Lauer A; Harcos A; Schaefgen B; von Au A; Spratte J; Riedel F; Rauch G; Hennigs A; Domschke C; Schott S; Rom J; Schuetz F; Sohn C; Golatta M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Sep; 296(3):571-582. PubMed ID: 28748340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Whole-Breast Ultrasound for Breast Screening and Archiving.
Huang CS; Yang YW; Chen RT; Lo CM; Lo C; Cheng CF; Lee CS; Chang RF
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 May; 43(5):926-933. PubMed ID: 28283326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of handheld ultrasound and automated breast ultrasound in women recalled after mammography screening.
Hellgren R; Dickman P; Leifland K; Saracco A; Hall P; Celebioglu F
Acta Radiol; 2017 May; 58(5):515-520. PubMed ID: 27565633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of automated breast ultrasonography to handheld ultrasonography in detecting and diagnosing breast lesions.
Jeh SK; Kim SH; Choi JJ; Jung SS; Choe BJ; Park S; Park MS
Acta Radiol; 2016 Feb; 57(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 25766727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Analysis of false-negative readings of automated breast ultrasound studies.
Grubstein A; Rapson Y; Gadiel I; Cohen M
J Clin Ultrasound; 2017 Jun; 45(5):245-251. PubMed ID: 28295423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a comparison between automatically generated breast volume scans and handheld ultrasound examinations.
Wang HY; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Dai Q; Liu H; Lai XJ; Sun Q
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3190-200. PubMed ID: 22386134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Accuracy of an automated breast volume ultrasound system for assessment of the pre-operative extent of pure ductal carcinoma in situ: comparison with a conventional handheld ultrasound examination.
Li N; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Dai Q; Liu H; Yang Q; Wang HY; Lai XJ; Sun Q
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Dec; 39(12):2255-63. PubMed ID: 24035630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Analysis of 107 breast lesions with automated 3D ultrasound and comparison with mammography and manual ultrasound.
Kotsianos-Hermle D; Hiltawsky KM; Wirth S; Fischer T; Friese K; Reiser M
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jul; 71(1):109-15. PubMed ID: 18468829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A Prospective Comparative Evaluation of Handheld Ultrasound Examination (HHUS) or Automated Ultrasound Examination (ABVS) in Women with Dense Breast.
Brunetti N; De Giorgis S; Tosto S; Garlaschi A; Rescinito G; Massa B; Calabrese M; Tagliafico AS
Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Sep; 12(9):. PubMed ID: 36140571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Automated Breast Ultrasound System for Breast Cancer Evaluation: Diagnostic Performance of the Two-View Scan Technique in Women with Small Breasts.
Kwon BR; Chang JM; Kim SY; Lee SH; Kim SY; Lee SM; Cho N; Moon WK
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Jan; 21(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 31920026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reliability of automated versus handheld breast ultrasound examinations of suspicious breast masses.
Yun G; Kim SM; Yun B; Ahn HS; Jang M
Ultrasonography; 2019 Jul; 38(3):264-271. PubMed ID: 30999717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Characterization of sonographically detected breast lesions using three-dimensional data sets].
Fischer T; Filimonow S; Hamm B; Slowinski T; Thomas A
Rofo; 2006 Dec; 178(12):1224-34. PubMed ID: 17136646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Initial clinical results with a fusion prototype for mammography and three-dimensional ultrasound with a standard mammography system and a standard ultrasound probe.
Emons J; Wunderle M; Hartmann A; Radicke M; Rauh C; Uder M; Gass P; Fasching PA; Langemann H; Beckmann MW; Schulz-Wendtland R; Jud SM
Acta Radiol; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1406-1413. PubMed ID: 29498297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison between execution and reading time of 3D ABUS versus HHUS.
Brunetti N; De Giorgis S; Zawaideh J; Rossi F; Calabrese M; Tagliafico AS
Radiol Med; 2020 Dec; 125(12):1243-1248. PubMed ID: 32367322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Three-dimensional automated breast ultrasound: Technical aspects and first results.
Vourtsis A
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2019 Oct; 100(10):579-592. PubMed ID: 30962169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Utility and Diagnostic Performance of Automated Breast Ultrasound System in Evaluating Pure Non-Mass Enhancement on Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Kwon BR; Chang JM; Kim SY; Lee SH; Shin SU; Yi A; Cho N; Moon WK
Korean J Radiol; 2020 Nov; 21(11):1210-1219. PubMed ID: 32729267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Stereotactic mammography imaging combined with 3D US imaging for image guided breast biopsy.
Surry KJ; Mills GR; Bevan K; Downey DB; Fenster A
Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4348-58. PubMed ID: 18072500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Recall rate of screening ultrasound with automated breast volumetric scanning (ABVS) in women with dense breasts: a first quarter experience.
Arleo EK; Saleh M; Ionescu D; Drotman M; Min RJ; Hentel K
Clin Imaging; 2014; 38(4):439-444. PubMed ID: 24768327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
