263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25311240)
1. Quantifying and comparing dynamic predictive accuracy of joint models for longitudinal marker and time-to-event in presence of censoring and competing risks.
Blanche P; Proust-Lima C; Loubère L; Berr C; Dartigues JF; Jacqmin-Gadda H
Biometrics; 2015 Mar; 71(1):102-113. PubMed ID: 25311240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimating and comparing time-dependent areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for censored event times with competing risks.
Blanche P; Dartigues JF; Jacqmin-Gadda H
Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(30):5381-97. PubMed ID: 24027076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Joint modeling of repeated multivariate cognitive measures and competing risks of dementia and death: a latent process and latent class approach.
Proust-Lima C; Dartigues JF; Jacqmin-Gadda H
Stat Med; 2016 Feb; 35(3):382-98. PubMed ID: 26376900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An R
Fournier MC; Dantan E; Blanche P
Stat Med; 2018 Mar; 37(7):1125-1133. PubMed ID: 29205452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic score for predicting risk of dementia over 10 years while accounting for competing risk of death.
Jacqmin-Gadda H; Blanche P; Chary E; Loubère L; Amieva H; Dartigues JF
Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Oct; 180(8):790-8. PubMed ID: 25190680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Review and comparison of ROC curve estimators for a time-dependent outcome with marker-dependent censoring.
Blanche P; Dartigues JF; Jacqmin-Gadda H
Biom J; 2013 Sep; 55(5):687-704. PubMed ID: 23794418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantifying and estimating the predictive accuracy for censored time-to-event data with competing risks.
Wu C; Li L
Stat Med; 2018 Sep; 37(21):3106-3124. PubMed ID: 29766537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interval-censored time-to-event and competing risk with death: is the illness-death model more accurate than the Cox model?
Leffondré K; Touraine C; Helmer C; Joly P
Int J Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 42(4):1177-86. PubMed ID: 23900486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantifying the predictive accuracy of time-to-event models in the presence of competing risks.
Schoop R; Beyersmann J; Schumacher M; Binder H
Biom J; 2011 Feb; 53(1):88-112. PubMed ID: 21259311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Joint latent class model for longitudinal data and interval-censored semi-competing events: Application to dementia.
Rouanet A; Joly P; Dartigues JF; Proust-Lima C; Jacqmin-Gadda H
Biometrics; 2016 Dec; 72(4):1123-1135. PubMed ID: 27123856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Concordance for prognostic models with competing risks.
Wolbers M; Blanche P; Koller MT; Witteman JC; Gerds TA
Biostatistics; 2014 Jul; 15(3):526-39. PubMed ID: 24493091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic prediction of cumulative incidence functions by direct binomial regression.
Grand MK; de Witte TJM; Putter H
Biom J; 2018 Jul; 60(4):734-747. PubMed ID: 29577376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Receiver operating characteristic curve estimation for time to event with semicompeting risks and interval censoring.
Jacqmin-Gadda H; Blanche P; Chary E; Touraine C; Dartigues JF
Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Dec; 25(6):2750-2766. PubMed ID: 24803510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Five-Year Dynamic Prediction of Dementia Using Repeated Measures of Cognitive Tests and a Dependency Scale.
Ben-Hassen C; Helmer C; Berr C; Jacqmin-Gadda H
Am J Epidemiol; 2022 Feb; 191(3):453-464. PubMed ID: 34753171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The importance of censoring in competing risks analysis of the subdistribution hazard.
Donoghoe MW; Gebski V
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):52. PubMed ID: 28376736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of joint modeling and landmarking for dynamic prediction under an illness-death model.
Suresh K; Taylor JMG; Spratt DE; Daignault S; Tsodikov A
Biom J; 2017 Nov; 59(6):1277-1300. PubMed ID: 28508545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On longitudinal prediction with time-to-event outcome: Comparison of modeling options.
Maziarz M; Heagerty P; Cai T; Zheng Y
Biometrics; 2017 Mar; 73(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 27438160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Individual dynamic prediction of clinical endpoint from large dimensional longitudinal biomarker history: a landmark approach.
Devaux A; Genuer R; Peres K; Proust-Lima C
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Jul; 22(1):188. PubMed ID: 35818025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Individualized dynamic prediction of survival with the presence of intermediate events.
Papageorgiou G; Mokhles MM; Takkenberg JJM; Rizopoulos D
Stat Med; 2019 Dec; 38(30):5623-5640. PubMed ID: 31667885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Wally plot approach to assess the calibration of clinical prediction models.
Blanche P; Gerds TA; Ekstrøm CT
Lifetime Data Anal; 2019 Jan; 25(1):150-167. PubMed ID: 29214550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
