166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25311569)
1. Effects of flip angle uncertainty and noise on the accuracy of DCE-MRI metrics: comparison between standard concentration-based and signal difference methods.
Wang P; Xue Y; Zhao X; Yu J; Rosen M; Song HK
Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Jan; 33(1):166-73. PubMed ID: 25311569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An analysis of the uncertainty and bias in DCE-MRI measurements using the spoiled gradient-recalled echo pulse sequence.
Subashi E; Choudhury KR; Johnson GA
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):032301. PubMed ID: 24593738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy and precision of quantitative DCE-MRI parameters: How should one estimate contrast concentration?
Wake N; Chandarana H; Rusinek H; Fujimoto K; Moy L; Sodickson DK; Kim SG
Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Oct; 52():16-23. PubMed ID: 29777820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of B
Sengupta A; Gupta RK; Singh A
J Transl Med; 2017 Dec; 15(1):242. PubMed ID: 29197390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Uncertainty and bias in contrast concentration measurements using spoiled gradient echo pulse sequences.
Schabel MC; Parker DL
Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(9):2345-73. PubMed ID: 18421121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Estimation of cellular-interstitial water exchange in dynamic contrast enhanced MRI using two flip angles.
Zhang J; Kim SG
NMR Biomed; 2019 Nov; 32(11):e4135. PubMed ID: 31348580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. DCE-MRI protocol for constraining absolute pharmacokinetic modeling errors within specific accuracy limits.
Knight SP; Meaney JF; Fagan AJ
Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3592-3602. PubMed ID: 31148187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility of a fast method for B1-inhomogeneity correction for FSPGR sequences.
van Schie JJ; Lavini C; van Vliet LJ; Vos FM
Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Apr; 33(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 25460328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameters independent of baseline T10 values.
Guo JY; Reddick WE; Rosen MA; Song HK
Magn Reson Imaging; 2009 Nov; 27(9):1208-15. PubMed ID: 19559556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: Study of inter-software accuracy and reproducibility using simulated and clinical data.
Beuzit L; Eliat PA; Brun V; Ferré JC; Gandon Y; Bannier E; Saint-Jalmes H
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jun; 43(6):1288-300. PubMed ID: 26687041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fast B1 mapping based on interleaved-three-flip-angle (ITFA) excitation.
Kang LH; Kim DE; Lee SY
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):112301. PubMed ID: 24320457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Simultaneous measurement of T
Zhang J; Winters K; Reynaud O; Kim SG
NMR Biomed; 2017 Sep; 30(9):. PubMed ID: 28544159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Absolute quantification of regional renal blood flow in swine by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using a blood pool contrast agent.
Lüdemann L; Nafz B; Elsner F; Grosse-Siestrup C; Meissler M; Kaufels N; Rehbein H; Persson PB; Michaely HJ; Lengsfeld P; Voth M; Gutberlet M
Invest Radiol; 2009 Mar; 44(3):125-34. PubMed ID: 19151609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Multi-Institutional Comparison of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Parameter Calculations.
Joint Head and Neck Radiotherapy-MRI Development Cooperative
Sci Rep; 2017 Sep; 7(1):11185. PubMed ID: 28894197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Flip angle optimization for dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI-studies with spoiled gradient echo pulse sequences.
De Naeyer D; Verhulst J; Ceelen W; Segers P; De Deene Y; Verdonck P
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 56(16):5373-95. PubMed ID: 21804179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of T
Malmberg MA; Odéen H; Parker DL
Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 49(4):2396-2412. PubMed ID: 35066898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Free-breathing dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for assessment of pulmonary lesions using golden-angle radial sparse parallel imaging.
Chen L; Liu D; Zhang J; Xie B; Zhou X; Grimm R; Huang X; Wang J; Feng L
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Aug; 48(2):459-468. PubMed ID: 29437281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of DCE-MRI parametric mapping using MP2RAGE and variable flip angle T1 mapping.
Bergen RV; Ryner L; Essig M
Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Jan; 95():103-109. PubMed ID: 32646633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic assessment of multi-echo dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI using a digital reference object.
Stokes AM; Semmineh NB; Nespodzany A; Bell LC; Quarles CC
Magn Reson Med; 2020 Jan; 83(1):109-123. PubMed ID: 31400035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reproducibility of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Part I. Perfusion characteristics in the female pelvis by using multiple computer-aided diagnosis perfusion analysis solutions.
Heye T; Davenport MS; Horvath JJ; Feuerlein S; Breault SR; Bashir MR; Merkle EM; Boll DT
Radiology; 2013 Mar; 266(3):801-11. PubMed ID: 23220897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
