These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2531199)

  • 1. Internally represented forces may be cognitively penetrable: comment on Freyd, Pantzer, and Cheng (1988).
    Ranney M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1989 Dec; 118(4):399-402. PubMed ID: 2531199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Representing statics as forces in equilibrium.
    Freyd JJ; Pantzer TM; Cheng JL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1988 Dec; 117(4):395-407. PubMed ID: 2974864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The experience of force: the role of haptic experience of forces in visual perception of object motion and interactions, mental simulation, and motion-related judgments.
    White PA
    Psychol Bull; 2012 Jul; 138(4):589-615. PubMed ID: 22730922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Out of mind, but not out of sight: intentional control of visual memory.
    Yotsumoto Y; Sekuler R
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jun; 34(4):776-86. PubMed ID: 17063909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mental extrapolation and cognitive penetrability: reply to Ranney and proposals for evaluative criteria.
    Finke RA; Freyd JJ
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1989 Dec; 118(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 2531200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exploring visual-spatial working memory: a critical review of concepts and models.
    McAfoose J; Baune BT
    Neuropsychol Rev; 2009 Mar; 19(1):130-42. PubMed ID: 18814035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why cognitive penetration of our perceptual experience is still the most plausible account.
    Newen A; Vetter P
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Jan; 47():26-37. PubMed ID: 27667320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Object recognition without knowledge of object orientation.
    Turnbull OH; Laws KR; McCarthy RA
    Cortex; 1995 Jun; 31(2):387-95. PubMed ID: 7555015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rats (Rattus norvegicus) flexibly retrieve objects' non-spatial and spatial information from their visuospatial working memory: effects of integrated and separate processing of these features in a missing-object recognition task.
    Keshen C; Cohen J
    Anim Cogn; 2016 Jan; 19(1):91-107. PubMed ID: 26311419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Memory for position and dynamic representations.
    Bertamini M
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Jul; 21(4):449-57. PubMed ID: 8350736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evidence for preserved representations in change blindness.
    Simons DJ; Chabris CF; Schnur T; Levin DT
    Conscious Cogn; 2002 Mar; 11(1):78-97. PubMed ID: 11883989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual perception of force: comment on White (2012).
    Hubbard TL
    Psychol Bull; 2012 Jul; 138(4):616-23; discussion 624-7. PubMed ID: 22730923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pre-cueing, the Epistemic Role of Early Vision, and the Cognitive Impenetrability of Early Vision.
    Raftopoulos A
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1156. PubMed ID: 28740474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial memory and explicit knowledge: an effect of instruction on representational momentum.
    Courtney JR; Hubbard TL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008; 61(12):1778-84. PubMed ID: 18609396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. On time, memory and dynamic form.
    Robbins SE
    Conscious Cogn; 2004 Dec; 13(4):762-88. PubMed ID: 15522631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual and verbal memory for objects and their spatial locations.
    Pezdek K; Evans GW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1979 Jul; 5(4):360-73. PubMed ID: 528916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Constructing visual representations of natural scenes: the roles of short- and long-term visual memory.
    Hollingworth A; Hollingworth A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Jun; 30(3):519-37. PubMed ID: 15161384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parietal Representations of Stimulus Features Are Amplified during Memory Retrieval and Flexibly Aligned with Top-Down Goals.
    Favila SE; Samide R; Sweigart SC; Kuhl BA
    J Neurosci; 2018 Sep; 38(36):7809-7821. PubMed ID: 30054390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How to (and how not to) think about top-down influences on visual perception.
    Teufel C; Nanay B
    Conscious Cogn; 2017 Jan; 47():17-25. PubMed ID: 27238628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for "top-down" effects.
    Firestone C; Scholl BJ
    Behav Brain Sci; 2016 Jan; 39():e229. PubMed ID: 26189677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.