These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

284 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2531207)

  • 1. Evidence for two types of spatial representations: hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations.
    Kosslyn SM; Koenig O; Barrett A; Cave CB; Tang J; Gabrieli JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1989 Nov; 15(4):723-35. PubMed ID: 2531207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial representations: a reappraisal.
    Rybash JM; Hoyer WJ
    Mem Cognit; 1992 May; 20(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 1508052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial relations: a review of the current evidence.
    Jager G; Postma A
    Neuropsychologia; 2003; 41(4):504-15. PubMed ID: 12559166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Judgments of relative position and distance on representations of spatial relations.
    Sergent J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Aug; 17(3):762-80. PubMed ID: 1834789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Categorization versus distance: hemispheric differences for processing spatial information.
    Hellige JB; Michimata C
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Nov; 17(6):770-6. PubMed ID: 2811674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The development of spatial relation representations: evidence from studies of cerebral lateralization.
    Koenig O; Reiss LP; Kosslyn SM
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1990 Aug; 50(1):119-30. PubMed ID: 2398329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations: computational analyses and computer simulations.
    Kosslyn SM; Chabris CF; Marsolek CJ; Koenig O
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 May; 18(2):562-77. PubMed ID: 1593235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hemispheric asymmetries in categorical judgments of direction versus coordinate judgments of velocity of motion.
    Christman SD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Jun; 9(2):298-305. PubMed ID: 12120792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A possible connection between categorical and coordinate spatial relation representations.
    Niebauer CL
    Brain Cogn; 2001 Dec; 47(3):434-45. PubMed ID: 11748899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lateralization of spatial categories: a comparison of verbal and visuospatial categorical relations.
    van der Ham IJ; Postma A
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Jul; 38(5):582-90. PubMed ID: 20551338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhanced image generation abilities in deaf signers: a right hemisphere effect.
    Emmorey K; Kosslyn SM
    Brain Cogn; 1996 Oct; 32(1):28-44. PubMed ID: 8899213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hemispheric preponderance in categorical and coordinate visual processes.
    Parrot M; Doyon B; Démonet JF; Cardebat D
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Oct; 37(11):1215-25. PubMed ID: 10530722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: new data and a meta-analysis of previous studies.
    Van Kleeck MH
    Neuropsychologia; 1989; 27(9):1165-78. PubMed ID: 2812299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Varying the scope of attention alters the encoding of categorical and coordinate spatial relations.
    Borst G; Kosslyn SM
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2769-72. PubMed ID: 20434469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Face recognition: a general or specific right hemisphere capacity?
    Levine SC; Banich MT; Koch-Weser MP
    Brain Cogn; 1988 Dec; 8(3):303-25. PubMed ID: 3214588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cerebral asymmetry in visual attention.
    Palmer T; Tzeng OJ
    Brain Cogn; 1990 May; 13(1):46-58. PubMed ID: 2346639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hemispheric specialization in the detection of subjective objects.
    Atchley RA; Atchley P
    Neuropsychologia; 1998 Dec; 36(12):1373-86. PubMed ID: 9863691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Newborns' perception of left-right spatial relations.
    Gava L; Valenza E; Turati C
    Child Dev; 2009; 80(6):1797-810. PubMed ID: 19930352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hemispheric asymmetries for spatial frequency discrimination in a selective attention task.
    Proverbio AM; Zani A; Avella C
    Brain Cogn; 1997 Jul; 34(2):311-20. PubMed ID: 9220094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Impaired grating discrimination following right hemisphere damage.
    Grabowska A; Semenza C; Denes G; Testa S
    Neuropsychologia; 1989; 27(2):259-63. PubMed ID: 2927636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.