These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2531209)

  • 21. Tonal hierarchies in the music of north India.
    Castellano MA; Bharucha JJ; Krumhansl CL
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1984 Sep; 113(3):394-412. PubMed ID: 6237169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Shifting perceptions: developmental changes in judgments of melodic similarity.
    Stalinski SM; Schellenberg EG
    Dev Psychol; 2010 Nov; 46(6):1799-803. PubMed ID: 20822211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Continuous loudness response to acoustic intensity dynamics in melodies: effects of melodic contour, tempo, and tonality.
    Olsen KN; Stevens CJ; Dean RT; Bailes F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jun; 149():117-28. PubMed ID: 24809252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Musical training shapes neural responses to melodic and prosodic expectation.
    Zioga I; Di Bernardi Luft C; Bhattacharya J
    Brain Res; 2016 Nov; 1650():267-282. PubMed ID: 27622645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perceptual tests of an algorithm for musical key-finding.
    Schmuckler MA; Tomovski R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Oct; 31(5):1124-49. PubMed ID: 16262503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Tonal expectations influence early pitch processing.
    Marmel F; Perrin F; Tillmann B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Oct; 23(10):3095-104. PubMed ID: 21265601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Responsiveness of Western adults to pitch-distributional information in melodic sequences.
    Oram N; Cuddy LL
    Psychol Res; 1995; 57(2):103-18. PubMed ID: 7708896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Memory for surface features of unfamiliar melodies: independent effects of changes in pitch and tempo.
    Schellenberg EG; Stalinski SM; Marks BM
    Psychol Res; 2014 Jan; 78(1):84-95. PubMed ID: 23385775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Expectancies generated by melodic intervals: perceptual judgments of melodic continuity.
    Cuddy LL; Lunney CA
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 May; 57(4):451-62. PubMed ID: 7596743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Distinct neural mechanisms of tonal processing between musicians and non-musicians.
    Amemiya K; Karino S; Ishizu T; Yumoto M; Yamasoba T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Apr; 125(4):738-747. PubMed ID: 24128792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Maximum key-profile correlation (MKC) as a measure of tonal structure in music.
    Takeuchi AH
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Sep; 56(3):335-46. PubMed ID: 7971133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of task and pitch structure on pitch-time interactions in music.
    Prince JB; Schmuckler MA; Thompson WF
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Apr; 37(3):368-81. PubMed ID: 19246351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Influence of a tone's tonal function on temporal change detection.
    Lebrun-Guillaud G; Tillmann B
    Percept Psychophys; 2007 Nov; 69(8):1450-9. PubMed ID: 18078234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Perceiving the tonal ending of tune excerpts: the roles of pre-existing representation and musical expertise.
    Hébert S; Peretz I; Gagnon L
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1995 Jun; 49(2):193-209. PubMed ID: 9183976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Expectancy in melody: tests of the implication-realization model.
    Schellenberg EG
    Cognition; 1996 Jan; 58(1):75-125. PubMed ID: 8808327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Attending to pitch information inhibits processing of pitch information: the curious case of amusia.
    Zendel BR; Lagrois MÉ; Robitaille N; Peretz I
    J Neurosci; 2015 Mar; 35(9):3815-24. PubMed ID: 25740512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Some influences of accent structure on melody recognition.
    Jones MR; Ralston JT
    Mem Cognit; 1991 Jan; 19(1):8-20. PubMed ID: 2017033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Coding strategies and recognition of melodies].
    Mikumo M
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1990 Dec; 61(5):291-8. PubMed ID: 2090844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Neural discrimination of nonprototypical chords in music experts and laymen: an MEG study.
    Brattico E; Pallesen KJ; Varyagina O; Bailey C; Anourova I; Järvenpää M; Eerola T; Tervaniemi M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 21(11):2230-44. PubMed ID: 18855547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pitch and Time Processing in Speech and Tones: The Effects of Musical Training and Attention.
    Sares AG; Foster NEV; Allen K; Hyde KL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 61(3):496-509. PubMed ID: 29466555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.