408 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25312398)
1. Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.
Ataseven B; Grimm C; Harter P; Prader S; Traut A; Heitz F; du Bois A
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Dec; 135(3):435-40. PubMed ID: 25312398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in stage IIIC epithelial ovarian cancer with node-positive in a SEER population-based study.
Zhou J; He ZY; Li FY; Sun JY; Lin HX; Wu SG; Chen QH
Oncotarget; 2016 Feb; 7(7):7952-9. PubMed ID: 26788911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in apparent early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: implications for surgical staging.
Powless CA; Aletti GD; Bakkum-Gamez JN; Cliby WA
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Sep; 122(3):536-40. PubMed ID: 21636114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of lymph node ratio on survival in stage III ovarian high-grade serous cancer: a Turkish Gynecologic Oncology Group study.
Ayhan A; Ozkan NT; Sarı ME; Celik H; Dede M; Akbayır Ö; Güngördük K; Şahin H; Haberal A; Güngör T; Arvas M; Meydanlı MM
J Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):e12. PubMed ID: 29185270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Defining the optimal lymphadenectomy cut-off value in epithelial ovarian cancer staging surgery utilizing a mathematical model of validation.
Pereira A; Irishina N; Pérez-Medina T; Magrina JF; Magtibay PM; Kovaleva A; Rodríguez-Tapia A; Iglesias E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2013 Mar; 39(3):290-6. PubMed ID: 23290581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Lymph node ratio in inguinal lymphadenectomy for squamous cell vulvar cancer: Results from the AGO-CaRE-1 study.
Polterauer S; Schwameis R; Grimm C; Hillemanns P; Jückstock J; Hilpert F; de Gregorio N; Hasenburg A; Sehouli J; Fürst ST; Strauß HG; Baumann K; Thiel F; Mustea A; Harter P; Wimberger P; Kölbl H; Reinthaller A; Woelber L; Mahner S
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 153(2):286-291. PubMed ID: 30760408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of lymphadenectomy in node-positive epithelial ovarian cancer.
Pereira A; Pérez-Medina T; Magrina JF; Magtibay PM; Millan I; Iglesias E
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jul; 22(6):987-92. PubMed ID: 22706223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The prognostic relevance of node metastases in optimally cytoreduced advanced ovarian cancer.
Bachmann C; Brucker SY; Kraemer B; Rothmund R; Staebler A; Fend F; Wallwiener D; Grischke EM
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2015 Aug; 141(8):1475-80. PubMed ID: 25739827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical significance of systematic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy during interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer patients.
Iwase H; Takada T; Iitsuka C; Nomura H; Abe A; Taniguchi T; Takizawa K
J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Oct; 26(4):303-10. PubMed ID: 26197771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of lymphadenectomy on survival after recurrence in patients with advanced ovarian cancer without suspected lymph node metastasis.
Paik ES; Shim M; Choi HJ; Lee YY; Kim TJ; Lee JW; Kim BG; Bae DS; Choi CH
Gynecol Oncol; 2016 Nov; 143(2):252-257. PubMed ID: 27567053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility, safety and clinical outcomes of cardiophrenic lymph node resection in advanced ovarian cancer.
Cowan RA; Tseng J; Murthy V; Srivastava R; Long Roche KC; Zivanovic O; Gardner GJ; Chi DS; Park BJ; Sonoda Y
Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 147(2):262-266. PubMed ID: 28888540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surgical management of cardiophrenic lymph nodes in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
Prader S; Harter P; Grimm C; Traut A; Waltering KU; Alesina PF; Heikaus S; Ataseven B; Heitz F; Schneider S; du Bois A
Gynecol Oncol; 2016 May; 141(2):271-275. PubMed ID: 26972337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The prognostic value of ratio-based lymph node staging in resected non-small-cell lung cancer.
Qiu C; Dong W; Su B; Liu Q; Du J
J Thorac Oncol; 2013 Apr; 8(4):429-35. PubMed ID: 23486264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of lymphadenectomy in advanced ovarian cancer according to residual tumor status: A population-based study.
Zhou J; Zhang WW; Zhang QH; He ZY; Sun JY; Chen QH; Wu SG
Int J Surg; 2018 Apr; 52():11-15. PubMed ID: 29432972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A novel nomogram based on LODDS to predict the prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer.
Xu XL; Cheng H; Tang MS; Zhang HL; Wu RY; Yu Y; Li X; Wang XM; Mai J; Yang CL; Jiao L; Li ZL; Zhong ZM; Deng R; Li JD; Zhu XF
Oncotarget; 2017 Jan; 8(5):8120-8130. PubMed ID: 28042955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Therapeutic value of selective lymphadenectomy in interval debulking surgery for stage IIIc and IV epithelial ovarian cancer.
Song N; Gao Y
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 May; 29(4):761-767. PubMed ID: 30850437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lymph node metastasis in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer macroscopically confined to the ovary: review of a single-institution experience.
Ulker V; Kuru O; Numanoglu C; Akbayır O; Polat I; Uhri M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 May; 289(5):1087-92. PubMed ID: 24213097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The efficacy of systematic lymph node dissection in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer during interval debulking surgery performed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Eoh KJ; Yoon JW; Lee I; Lee JY; Kim S; Kim SW; Kim YT; Nam EJ
J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 116(3):329-336. PubMed ID: 28542980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lymph node ratio and surgical quality are strong prognostic factors of rectal cancer: results from a single referral centre.
Leonard D; Remue C; Abbes Orabi N; van Maanen A; Danse E; Dragean A; Debetancourt D; Humblet Y; Jouret-Mourin A; Maddalena F; Medina Benites A; Scalliet P; Sempoux C; Van den Eynde M; De Schoutheete JC; Kartheuser A
Colorectal Dis; 2016 Jun; 18(6):O175-84. PubMed ID: 27128602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Significance of preoperative serum CA-125 levels in the prediction of lymph node metastasis in epithelial ovarian cancer.
Kim HS; Park NH; Chung HH; Kim JW; Song YS; Kang SB
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1136-42. PubMed ID: 18951217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
