These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

59 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25312557)

  • 1. Uniform presentation of process evaluation results facilitates the evaluation of complex interventions: development of a graph.
    Bakker FC; Persoon A; Schoon Y; Olde Rikkert MG
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2015 Feb; 21(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 25312557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of interventions that assist caregivers to support people with dementia living in the community: a systematic review.
    Parker D; Mills S; Abbey J
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Jun; 6(2):137-72. PubMed ID: 21631819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How to perform a preplanned process evaluation for complex interventions in geriatric medicine: exemplified with the process evaluation of a complex falls-prevention program for community-dwelling frail older fallers.
    Reelick MF; Faes MC; Esselink RA; Kessels RP; Olde Rikkert MG
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2011 Jun; 12(5):331-6. PubMed ID: 21450245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation framework for a multi-site practice-based interprofessional education intervention.
    Trojan L; Suter E; Arthur N; Taylor E
    J Interprof Care; 2009 Jul; 23(4):380-9. PubMed ID: 19370447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
    Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Pragmatism and realism for public health intervention evaluation].
    Ridde V; Haddad S
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2013 Jun; 61 Suppl 2():S95-106. PubMed ID: 23684341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Methodological issues in oral health research: intervention studies.
    O'Mullane D; James P; Whelton H; Parnell C
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 40 Suppl 1():15-20. PubMed ID: 22369704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Failure of intervention or failure of evaluation: a meta-evaluation of the National Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign Evaluation.
    Magura S
    Subst Use Misuse; 2012; 47(13-14):1414-20. PubMed ID: 23186426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Approach for conducting the longitudinal program evaluation of the US Department of Health and Human Services National Action Plan to prevent healthcare-associated infections: roadmap to elimination.
    Kahn KL; Mendel P; Weinberg DA; Leuschner KJ; Gall EM; Siegel S
    Med Care; 2014 Feb; 52(2 Suppl 1):S9-16. PubMed ID: 24430272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.
    Skelly AC; Hashimoto RE; Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fischer DJ; Wilson JR; Tetreault LA; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. PubMed ID: 24026148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Community interventions providing care and support to orphans and vulnerable children: a review of evaluation evidence.
    Schenk KD
    AIDS Care; 2009 Jul; 21(7):918-42. PubMed ID: 20024749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Evaluation in the health sector: concepts and methods].
    Contandriopoulos AP; Champagne F; Denis JL; Avargues MC
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2000 Dec; 48(6):517-39. PubMed ID: 11148425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation model for psychoeducational interventions using interactive multimedia.
    Beale IL
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2002 Dec; 5(6):565-80. PubMed ID: 12556120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Promoting physical activity in children: The stepwise development of the primary school-based JUMP-in intervention applying the RE-AIM evaluation framework.
    De Meij JS; Chinapaw MJ; Kremers SP; Van der Wal MF; Jurg ME; Van Mechelen W
    Br J Sports Med; 2010 Sep; 44(12):879-87. PubMed ID: 19019902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dialogue boxes: a tool for collaborative process evaluation.
    Roe K; Roe K
    Health Promot Pract; 2004 Apr; 5(2):138-50. PubMed ID: 15090168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using mixed methods to develop and evaluate complex interventions in palliative care research.
    Farquhar MC; Ewing G; Booth S
    Palliat Med; 2011 Dec; 25(8):748-57. PubMed ID: 21807749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Context, Process, and Outcome Evaluation Model for Organisational Health Interventions.
    Fridrich A; Jenny GJ; Bauer GF
    Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():414832. PubMed ID: 26557665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.