These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25312899)

  • 1. COMBI: a convenient tool for clinical outcome assessment in conventional practice.
    Stojanovic MP; Higgins DM; Popescu A; Bogduk N
    Pain Med; 2015 Mar; 16(3):513-9. PubMed ID: 25312899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Critiquing the critiques: the American Pain Society guideline and the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians' response to it.
    Chou R
    Pain Physician; 2011; 14(1):E69-73; author reply E73-82. PubMed ID: 21267049
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Utility of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in neurologic pain disorders.
    Binder A; Baron R
    Neurology; 2010 Jan; 74(2):104-5. PubMed ID: 20042703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Core outcome domains and measures for pediatric acute and chronic/recurrent pain clinical trials: PedIMMPACT recommendations.
    McGrath PJ; Walco GA; Turk DC; Dworkin RH; Brown MT; Davidson K; Eccleston C; Finley GA; Goldschneider K; Haverkos L; Hertz SH; Ljungman G; Palermo T; Rappaport BA; Rhodes T; Schechter N; Scott J; Sethna N; Svensson OK; Stinson J; von Baeyer CL; Walker L; Weisman S; White RE; Zajicek A; Zeltzer L;
    J Pain; 2008 Sep; 9(9):771-83. PubMed ID: 18562251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Guidelines for the assessment of pain. Version 8.3 from 9.7.2004].
    Schiltenwolf M; ; ; ; ;
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2004; 142(4):377-81. PubMed ID: 15386199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. American Academy of Pediatrics Report of the Subcommittee on Assessment and Methodologic Issues in the Management of Pain in Childhood Cancer.
    McGrath PJ; Beyer J; Cleeland C; Eland J; McGrath PA; Portenoy R
    Pediatrics; 1990 Nov; 86(5 Pt 2):814-7. PubMed ID: 2216643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire (APS-POQ-R) for quality improvement of pain management in hospitalized adults: preliminary psychometric evaluation.
    Gordon DB; Polomano RC; Pellino TA; Turk DC; McCracken LM; Sherwood G; Paice JA; Wallace MS; Strassels SA; Farrar JT
    J Pain; 2010 Nov; 11(11):1172-86. PubMed ID: 20400379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Outcome sensitivity of the North American Spine Society Instrument with special consideration for the neurogenic symptoms of chronic back pain].
    Peters A; Sabariego C; Wildner M; Sangha Dagger O
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2004; 142(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 15346305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Food insensitive editorial on outcome measures.
    Chaturvedi SK
    Pain; 2005 May; 115(1-2):217-8; author reply 218. PubMed ID: 15836990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pain assessment tools: is the content appropriate for use in palliative care?
    Hølen JC; Hjermstad MJ; Loge JH; Fayers PM; Caraceni A; De Conno F; Forbes K; Fürst CJ; Radbruch L; Kaasa S
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2006 Dec; 32(6):567-80. PubMed ID: 17157759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The visual analog scale and a five-item verbal rating scale are not interchangeable for back pain assessment in lumbar spine disorders.
    Matamalas A; Ramírez M; Mojal S; García De Frutos A; Molina A; Saló G; Lladó A; Cáceres E
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Oct; 35(21):E1115-9. PubMed ID: 20838265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pain in the elderly.
    Feldt KS
    Adv Nurse Pract; 2005 Jun; 13(6):51-2, 54. PubMed ID: 15984359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Pitfalls in pain measurement. Visual analog scale as pain assessment method questioned].
    Rolfsson H
    Lakartidningen; 2009 Feb 25-Mar 3; 106(9):591-3. PubMed ID: 19388450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Managing pressure ulcers: the need for pain assessment.
    Taylor A
    Community Nurse; 2000 Apr; 6(3):45-6. PubMed ID: 12778508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Principles of highly effective pain managers.
    Director; 2003; 11(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 12630138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The reliability and validity of pain interference measures in persons with multiple sclerosis.
    Osborne TL; Raichle KA; Jensen MP; Ehde DM; Kraft G
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2006 Sep; 32(3):217-29. PubMed ID: 16939846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Re: Pietrobon R, Coeytaux RR, Carey TS, et al. Standard scales for measurement of functional outcome for cervical pain or dysfunction: a systematic review. Spine 2002;27:515-22.
    Goolkasian P; Wheeler AH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Oct; 27(20):2299-301; author reply 2299-301. PubMed ID: 12394911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measures of pediatric pain: 21-numbered circle Visual Analog Scale (VAS), E-Ouch Electronic Pain Diary, Oucher, Pain Behavior Observation Method, Pediatric Pain Assessment Tool (PPAT), and Pediatric Pain Questionnaire (PPQ).
    Lootens CC; Rapoff MA
    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2011 Nov; 63 Suppl 11():S253-62. PubMed ID: 22588749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Pain evaluation scale or the myth of the magic ruler].
    Javel P
    Soins; 2001 Jun; (656):37-9. PubMed ID: 12008534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Establishing an emergency department pain management system.
    Richards CF
    Emerg Med Clin North Am; 2005 May; 23(2):519-27. PubMed ID: 15829395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.