These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2531342)

  • 1. [Requirements and their realization in thoracic radiography].
    Biebesheimer V
    Offentl Gesundheitswes; 1989; 51(8-9):512-5. PubMed ID: 2531342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The development and most recent status of thoracic diagnosis with reference to the low-dose image intensifier].
    Gremer E
    Offentl Gesundheitswes; 1989; 51(8-9):510-1. PubMed ID: 2531341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
    Tingberg A; Sjöström D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Radiological study of the thorax. Evaluation of efficacy-efficiency of a large-field image intensifier in mass screening].
    Bonetti MG; Gregori S; Lamarche V; Radice E; Spiga G; Maggi S; Giorgini P; Giovagnoni A; De Nigris E; Amici F
    Radiol Med; 1989 Sep; 78(3):178-84. PubMed ID: 2798965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and effective dose using four digital systems.
    Pascoal A; Lawinski CP; Mackenzie A; Tabakov S; Lewis CA
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):273-7. PubMed ID: 15933121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Photostimulation plates or conventional films for bedside chest x-ray in pediatric radiology? A comparative study of quality of image and the dose delivered to patients].
    Maccia C; Docou le Pointe H; Fery-Lemonnier E; Nadeau X; Montagne JP; Charpentier E; Ariche-Cohen M; Viens-Bitker C
    J Radiol; 1996 Nov; 77(11):1129-34. PubMed ID: 9033870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chest image quality: film-screen vs. computed radiography.
    Freedman M
    Adm Radiol; 1991 Jul; 10(7):38-40, 42. PubMed ID: 10170769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computed and conventional chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
    Ramli K; Abdullah BJ; Ng KH; Mahmud R; Hussain AF
    Australas Radiol; 2005 Dec; 49(6):460-6. PubMed ID: 16351609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Dose requirements for projection techniques in x-ray diagnosis].
    Hagemann G
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1992 May; 2(3):123-30. PubMed ID: 1610926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
    Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Drescher P; Loose R; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
    Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Initial clinical results with a new needle screen storage phosphor system in chest radiograms.
    Körner M; Wirth S; Treitl M; Reiser M; Pfeifer KJ
    Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1491-6. PubMed ID: 16302129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital chest radiography system with amorphous selenium flat-panel detectors: Qualitative and dosimetric comparison with a dedicated film-screen system.
    Prato A; Ropolo R; Fava C
    Radiol Med; 2005; 110(5-6):561-73. PubMed ID: 16437042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Bedside thoracic radiography: a comparison between 3 different types of grid].
    Ciccotosto C; Storto ML; Guidotti A; Ferrante R; Bonomo L
    Radiol Med; 1994; 87(1-2):127-33. PubMed ID: 8128015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Reduction of patient exposure by the use of digital luminescence radiography].
    Seifert H; Chapot C
    J Radiol; 1999 Nov; 80(11):1555-60. PubMed ID: 10592912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Digital luminescence radiography. A new method of study in thoracic diagnosis at the intensive care unit].
    Witte G; Pothmann W; Bause H; Nicolas V; Schulte am Esch J; Bücheler E
    Anasth Intensivther Notfallmed; 1989 Feb; 24(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 2653089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An investigation into the radiation dose associated with different imaging systems for chest radiology.
    Marshall NW; Faulkner K; Busch HP; Marsh DM; Pfenning H
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Apr; 67(796):353-9. PubMed ID: 8173876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Acceptance testing and routine quality control in general radiography: mobile units and film/screen fixed systems.
    Gray L; Dowling A; Gallagher A; Gorman D; O'Connor U; Devine M; Larkin A; Walsh C; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):276-8. PubMed ID: 18326885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Digital radiography].
    Haendle J
    Computertomographie; 1983 Mar; 3(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 6354446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Significance of imaging procedures in diagnosis in pediatrics. Introduction].
    Ball F
    Monatsschr Kinderheilkd; 1986 Jun; 134(6):345-8. PubMed ID: 3748026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.