These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25313965)

  • 1. Control of spatial orienting: context-specific proportion cued effects in an exogenous spatial cueing task.
    Gough A; Garcia J; Torres-Quesada M; Milliken B
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Nov; 30():220-33. PubMed ID: 25313965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A secondary task is not always costly: Context-based guidance of visual search survives interference from a demanding working memory task.
    Annac E; Zang X; Müller HJ; Geyer T
    Br J Psychol; 2019 May; 110(2):381-399. PubMed ID: 30260470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Attentional inertia and delayed orienting of spatial attention in task-switching.
    Longman CS; Lavric A; Munteanu C; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Aug; 40(4):1580-602. PubMed ID: 24842065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Context-specific learning and control: the roles of awareness, task relevance, and relative salience.
    Crump MJ; Vaquero JM; Milliken B
    Conscious Cogn; 2008 Mar; 17(1):22-36. PubMed ID: 17349805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interaction between scene-based and array-based contextual cueing.
    Rosenbaum GM; Jiang YV
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):888-99. PubMed ID: 23572204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orienting of spatial attention in Huntington's Disease.
    Couette M; Bachoud-Levi AC; Brugieres P; Sieroff E; Bartolomeo P
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Apr; 46(5):1391-400. PubMed ID: 18242648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-visual spatial tasks reveal increased interactions with stance postural control.
    Woollacott M; Vander Velde T
    Brain Res; 2008 May; 1208():95-102. PubMed ID: 18394592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implicit learning of spatiotemporal contingencies in spatial cueing.
    Rieth CA; Huber DE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Aug; 39(4):1165-80. PubMed ID: 23181686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Task-relevant information is prioritized in spatiotemporal contextual cueing.
    Higuchi Y; Ueda Y; Ogawa H; Saiki J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2397-2410. PubMed ID: 27566325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neural mechanisms of visual attention: object-based selection of a region in space.
    Arrington CM; Carr TH; Mayer AR; Rao SM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2000; 12 Suppl 2():106-17. PubMed ID: 11506651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unconscious attentional orienting to exogenous cues: A review of the literature.
    Mulckhuyse M; Theeuwes J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):299-309. PubMed ID: 20378092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The proportion valid effect in covert orienting: strategic control or implicit learning?
    Risko EF; Stolz JA
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):432-42. PubMed ID: 20189414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exogenous and endogenous spatial attention effects on visuospatial working memory.
    Botta F; Santangelo V; Raffone A; Lupiáñez J; Belardinelli MO
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Aug; 63(8):1590-602. PubMed ID: 20112160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional control of response selection in task switching.
    Schneider DW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Oct; 41(5):1315-24. PubMed ID: 26076177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the role of working memory in spatial contextual cueing.
    Travis SL; Mattingley JB; Dux PE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):208-19. PubMed ID: 22642237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ERP evidence for selective drop in attentional costs in uncertain environments: challenging a purely premotor account of covert orienting of attention.
    Lasaponara S; Chica AB; Lecce F; Lupianez J; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(9):2648-57. PubMed ID: 21640737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spatial cueing deficits in dyslexia reflect generalised difficulties with attentional selection.
    Roach NW; Hogben JH
    Vision Res; 2008 Jan; 48(2):193-207. PubMed ID: 18068752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gait profiles as indicators of domain-specific impairments in executive control across neurodevelopmental disorders.
    Hocking DR; Menant JC; Kirk HE; Lord S; Porter MA
    Res Dev Disabil; 2014 Jan; 35(1):203-14. PubMed ID: 24176260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.
    Griffin IC; Nobre AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1176-94. PubMed ID: 14709235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.