These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25314225)

  • 1. Host-parasite interactions and the evolution of nonrandom mating.
    Greenspoon PB; M'Gonigle LK
    Evolution; 2014 Dec; 68(12):3570-80. PubMed ID: 25314225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Choosy Wolves? Heterozygote Advantage But No Evidence of MHC-Based Disassortative Mating.
    Galaverni M; Caniglia R; Milanesi P; Lapalombella S; Fabbri E; Randi E
    J Hered; 2016 Mar; 107(2):134-42. PubMed ID: 26610365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When do host-parasite interactions drive the evolution of non-random mating?
    Nuismer SL; Otto SP; Blanquart F
    Ecol Lett; 2008 Sep; 11(9):937-46. PubMed ID: 18522642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mating preferences can drive expansion or contraction of major histocompatibility complex gene family.
    Bentkowski P; Radwan J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Feb; 287(1921):20192706. PubMed ID: 32097586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evolution of disassortative and assortative mating preferences based on imprinting.
    Ihara Y; Feldman MW
    Theor Popul Biol; 2003 Sep; 64(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 12948680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When Do Opposites Attract? A Model Uncovering the Evolution of Disassortative Mating.
    Maisonneuve L; Beneteau T; Joron M; Smadi C; Llaurens V
    Am Nat; 2021 Nov; 198(5):625-641. PubMed ID: 34648401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evolution and genetic architecture of disassortative mating at a locus under heterozygote advantage.
    Maisonneuve L; Chouteau M; Joron M; Llaurens V
    Evolution; 2021 Jan; 75(1):149-165. PubMed ID: 33210282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Host-parasite interactions and the evolution of ploidy.
    Nuismer SL; Otto SP
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2004 Jul; 101(30):11036-9. PubMed ID: 15252199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Immunogenetic novelty confers a selective advantage in host-pathogen coevolution.
    Phillips KP; Cable J; Mohammed RS; Herdegen-Radwan M; Raubic J; Przesmycka KJ; van Oosterhout C; Radwan J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Feb; 115(7):1552-1557. PubMed ID: 29339521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexual selection and the evolutionary dynamics of the major histocompatibility complex.
    Jan Ejsmond M; Radwan J; Wilson AB
    Proc Biol Sci; 2014 Dec; 281(1796):20141662. PubMed ID: 25339723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MHC polymorphism under host-pathogen coevolution.
    Borghans JA; Beltman JB; De Boer RJ
    Immunogenetics; 2004 Feb; 55(11):732-9. PubMed ID: 14722687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How parasite interaction strategies alter virulence evolution in multi-parasite communities.
    Clay PA; Rudolf VHW
    Evolution; 2019 Nov; 73(11):2189-2203. PubMed ID: 31506940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gene duplication and divergence produce divergent MHC genotypes without disassortative mating.
    Dearborn DC; Gager AB; McArthur AG; Gilmour ME; Mandzhukova E; Mauck RA
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Sep; 25(17):4355-67. PubMed ID: 27376487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in the polygynous primate: the Sichuan snub-nosed monkey (Rhinopithecus roxellana).
    Yang B; Ren B; Xiang Z; Yang J; Yao H; Garber PA; Li M
    Integr Zool; 2014 Nov; 9(5):598-612. PubMed ID: 24382257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The evolution of mutation rate in an antagonistic coevolutionary model with maternal transmission of parasites.
    Greenspoon PB; M'Gonigle LK
    Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Jun; 280(1761):20130647. PubMed ID: 23760645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Major histocompatibility complex variation associated with juvenile survival and parasite resistance in a large unmanaged ungulate population.
    Paterson S; Wilson K; Pemberton JM
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1998 Mar; 95(7):3714-9. PubMed ID: 9520432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Evolution of Mating Preferences and Major Histocompatibility Complex Genes.
    Penn DJ; Potts WK
    Am Nat; 1999 Feb; 153(2):145-164. PubMed ID: 29578757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Population Differences at MHC Do Not Explain Enhanced Resistance of Song Sparrows to Local Parasites.
    Slade JW; Sarquis-Adamson Y; Gloor GB; Lachance MA; MacDougall-Shackleton EA
    J Hered; 2017 Mar; 108(2):127-134. PubMed ID: 27940472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Coevolution of parasite virulence and host mating strategies.
    Ashby B; Boots M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Oct; 112(43):13290-5. PubMed ID: 26430236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ploidy and the evolution of parasitism.
    M'Gonigle LK; Otto SP
    Proc Biol Sci; 2011 Sep; 278(1719):2814-22. PubMed ID: 21288940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.