349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25314637)
1. KRAS mutation testing of tumours in adults with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Westwood M; van Asselt T; Ramaekers B; Whiting P; Joore M; Armstrong N; Noake C; Ross J; Severens J; Kleijnen J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 Oct; 18(62):1-132. PubMed ID: 25314637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase (EGFR-TK) mutation testing in adults with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.
Westwood M; Joore M; Whiting P; van Asselt T; Ramaekers B; Armstrong N; Misso K; Severens J; Kleijnen J
Health Technol Assess; 2014 May; 18(32):1-166. PubMed ID: 24827857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic model.
Hoyle M; Crathorne L; Peters J; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Tappenden P; Hyde C
Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(14):1-237. PubMed ID: 23547747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. KRAS Testing for Anti-EGFR Therapy in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: An Evidence-Based and Economic Analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(25):1-49. PubMed ID: 23074403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (review of technology appraisal no. 176) and panitumumab (partial review of technology appraisal no. 240) for previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
Huxley N; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Tikhonova I; Snowsill T; Briscoe S; Peters J; Bond M; Napier M; Hoyle M
Health Technol Assess; 2017 Jun; 21(38):1-294. PubMed ID: 28682222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prospective cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluation of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group CO.17 trial.
Mittmann N; Au HJ; Tu D; O'Callaghan CJ; Isogai PK; Karapetis CS; Zalcberg JR; Evans WK; Moore MJ; Siddiqui J; Findlay B; Colwell B; Simes J; Gibbs P; Links M; Tebbutt NC; Jonker DJ; ;
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(17):1182-92. PubMed ID: 19666851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors for metastatic colorectal cancer.
Chan DLH; Segelov E; Wong RS; Smith A; Herbertson RA; Li BT; Tebbutt N; Price T; Pavlakis N
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jun; 6(6):CD007047. PubMed ID: 28654140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness analysis of KRAS testing and cetuximab as last-line therapy for colorectal cancer.
Shiroiwa T; Motoo Y; Tsutani K
Mol Diagn Ther; 2010 Dec; 14(6):375-84. PubMed ID: 21275455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of cetuximab, cetuximab plus irinotecan, and panitumumab for third and further lines of treatment for KRAS wild-type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Hoyle M; Peters J; Crathorne L; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Hyde C
Value Health; 2013; 16(2):288-96. PubMed ID: 23538180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness of KRAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients in the United States and Germany.
Vijayaraghavan A; Efrusy MB; Göke B; Kirchner T; Santas CC; Goldberg RM
Int J Cancer; 2012 Jul; 131(2):438-45. PubMed ID: 21898389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. KRAS and BRAF mutation analysis in metastatic colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis from a Swiss perspective.
Blank PR; Moch H; Szucs TD; Schwenkglenks M
Clin Cancer Res; 2011 Oct; 17(19):6338-46. PubMed ID: 21807639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of KRAS genotype: therascreen assay vs. LNA-mediated qPCR clamping assay.
Chang SC; Denne J; Zhao L; Horak C; Green G; Khambata-Ford S; Bray C; Celik I; Van Cutsem E; Harbison C
Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2013 Sep; 12(3):195-203.e2. PubMed ID: 23978462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy and toxicity of adding cetuximab to chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis from 12 randomized controlled trials.
Lv ZC; Ning JY; Chen HB
Tumour Biol; 2014 Dec; 35(12):11741-50. PubMed ID: 25417200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Testing strategies for Lynch syndrome in people with endometrial cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.
Stinton C; Jordan M; Fraser H; Auguste P; Court R; Al-Khudairy L; Madan J; Grammatopoulos D; Taylor-Phillips S
Health Technol Assess; 2021 Jun; 25(42):1-216. PubMed ID: 34169821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Economic analysis of bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Lawrence D; Maschio M; Leahy KJ; Yunger S; Easaw JC; Weinstein MC
J Med Econ; 2013 Dec; 16(12):1387-98. PubMed ID: 24102083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predictive and prognostic factors in the complex treatment of patients with colorectal cancer.
László L
Magy Onkol; 2010 Dec; 54(4):383-94. PubMed ID: 21163770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Economic Analysis of First-Line Treatment with Cetuximab or Panitumumab for RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in England.
Tikhonova IA; Huxley N; Snowsill T; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Napier M; Hoyle M
Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Jul; 36(7):837-851. PubMed ID: 29498000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Efficacy according to biomarker status of cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the OPUS study.
Bokemeyer C; Bondarenko I; Hartmann JT; de Braud F; Schuch G; Zubel A; Celik I; Schlichting M; Koralewski P
Ann Oncol; 2011 Jul; 22(7):1535-1546. PubMed ID: 21228335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. KRAS early testing: consensus initiative and cost-effectiveness evaluation for metastatic colorectal patients in an Italian setting.
Barone C; Pinto C; Normanno N; Capussotti L; Cognetti F; Falcone A; Mantovani L
PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85897. PubMed ID: 24465771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 in untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a Gruppo Oncologico dell'Italia Meridionale Multicenter phase II study.
Colucci G; Giuliani F; Garufi C; Mattioli R; Manzione L; Russo A; Lopez M; Parrella P; Tommasi S; Copetti M; Daniele B; Pisconti S; Tuveri G; Silvestris N; Maiello E
Oncology; 2010; 79(5-6):415-22. PubMed ID: 21474966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
