These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25314637)

  • 1. KRAS mutation testing of tumours in adults with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Westwood M; van Asselt T; Ramaekers B; Whiting P; Joore M; Armstrong N; Noake C; Ross J; Severens J; Kleijnen J
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Oct; 18(62):1-132. PubMed ID: 25314637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase (EGFR-TK) mutation testing in adults with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Westwood M; Joore M; Whiting P; van Asselt T; Ramaekers B; Armstrong N; Misso K; Severens J; Kleijnen J
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 May; 18(32):1-166. PubMed ID: 24827857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (mono- or combination chemotherapy), bevacizumab (combination with non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy) and panitumumab (monotherapy) for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer after first-line chemotherapy (review of technology appraisal No.150 and part review of technology appraisal No. 118): a systematic review and economic model.
    Hoyle M; Crathorne L; Peters J; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Tappenden P; Hyde C
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 Apr; 17(14):1-237. PubMed ID: 23547747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. KRAS Testing for Anti-EGFR Therapy in Advanced Colorectal Cancer: An Evidence-Based and Economic Analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(25):1-49. PubMed ID: 23074403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of cetuximab (review of technology appraisal no. 176) and panitumumab (partial review of technology appraisal no. 240) for previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Huxley N; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Tikhonova I; Snowsill T; Briscoe S; Peters J; Bond M; Napier M; Hoyle M
    Health Technol Assess; 2017 Jun; 21(38):1-294. PubMed ID: 28682222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective cost-effectiveness analysis of cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluation of National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group CO.17 trial.
    Mittmann N; Au HJ; Tu D; O'Callaghan CJ; Isogai PK; Karapetis CS; Zalcberg JR; Evans WK; Moore MJ; Siddiqui J; Findlay B; Colwell B; Simes J; Gibbs P; Links M; Tebbutt NC; Jonker DJ; ;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2009 Sep; 101(17):1182-92. PubMed ID: 19666851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors for metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Chan DLH; Segelov E; Wong RS; Smith A; Herbertson RA; Li BT; Tebbutt N; Price T; Pavlakis N
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Jun; 6(6):CD007047. PubMed ID: 28654140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness analysis of KRAS testing and cetuximab as last-line therapy for colorectal cancer.
    Shiroiwa T; Motoo Y; Tsutani K
    Mol Diagn Ther; 2010 Dec; 14(6):375-84. PubMed ID: 21275455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of cetuximab, cetuximab plus irinotecan, and panitumumab for third and further lines of treatment for KRAS wild-type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
    Hoyle M; Peters J; Crathorne L; Jones-Hughes T; Cooper C; Napier M; Hyde C
    Value Health; 2013; 16(2):288-96. PubMed ID: 23538180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of KRAS testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients in the United States and Germany.
    Vijayaraghavan A; Efrusy MB; Göke B; Kirchner T; Santas CC; Goldberg RM
    Int J Cancer; 2012 Jul; 131(2):438-45. PubMed ID: 21898389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. KRAS and BRAF mutation analysis in metastatic colorectal cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis from a Swiss perspective.
    Blank PR; Moch H; Szucs TD; Schwenkglenks M
    Clin Cancer Res; 2011 Oct; 17(19):6338-46. PubMed ID: 21807639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of KRAS genotype: therascreen assay vs. LNA-mediated qPCR clamping assay.
    Chang SC; Denne J; Zhao L; Horak C; Green G; Khambata-Ford S; Bray C; Celik I; Van Cutsem E; Harbison C
    Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2013 Sep; 12(3):195-203.e2. PubMed ID: 23978462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Efficacy and toxicity of adding cetuximab to chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis from 12 randomized controlled trials.
    Lv ZC; Ning JY; Chen HB
    Tumour Biol; 2014 Dec; 35(12):11741-50. PubMed ID: 25417200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing strategies for Lynch syndrome in people with endometrial cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.
    Stinton C; Jordan M; Fraser H; Auguste P; Court R; Al-Khudairy L; Madan J; Grammatopoulos D; Taylor-Phillips S
    Health Technol Assess; 2021 Jun; 25(42):1-216. PubMed ID: 34169821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Economic analysis of bevacizumab, cetuximab, and panitumumab with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
    Lawrence D; Maschio M; Leahy KJ; Yunger S; Easaw JC; Weinstein MC
    J Med Econ; 2013 Dec; 16(12):1387-98. PubMed ID: 24102083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictive and prognostic factors in the complex treatment of patients with colorectal cancer.
    László L
    Magy Onkol; 2010 Dec; 54(4):383-94. PubMed ID: 21163770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Economic Analysis of First-Line Treatment with Cetuximab or Panitumumab for RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in England.
    Tikhonova IA; Huxley N; Snowsill T; Crathorne L; Varley-Campbell J; Napier M; Hoyle M
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2018 Jul; 36(7):837-851. PubMed ID: 29498000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy according to biomarker status of cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the OPUS study.
    Bokemeyer C; Bondarenko I; Hartmann JT; de Braud F; Schuch G; Zubel A; Celik I; Schlichting M; Koralewski P
    Ann Oncol; 2011 Jul; 22(7):1535-1546. PubMed ID: 21228335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. KRAS early testing: consensus initiative and cost-effectiveness evaluation for metastatic colorectal patients in an Italian setting.
    Barone C; Pinto C; Normanno N; Capussotti L; Cognetti F; Falcone A; Mantovani L
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85897. PubMed ID: 24465771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 in untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a Gruppo Oncologico dell'Italia Meridionale Multicenter phase II study.
    Colucci G; Giuliani F; Garufi C; Mattioli R; Manzione L; Russo A; Lopez M; Parrella P; Tommasi S; Copetti M; Daniele B; Pisconti S; Tuveri G; Silvestris N; Maiello E
    Oncology; 2010; 79(5-6):415-22. PubMed ID: 21474966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.