BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25315146)

  • 1. Stroke volume variation and indexed stroke volume measured using bioreactance predict fluid responsiveness in postoperative children.
    Vergnaud E; Vidal C; Verchère J; Miatello J; Meyer P; Carli P; Orliaguet G
    Br J Anaesth; 2015 Jan; 114(1):103-9. PubMed ID: 25315146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The ability of stroke volume variation measured by a noninvasive cardiac output monitor to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated children.
    Lee JY; Kim JY; Choi CH; Kim HS; Lee KC; Kwak HJ
    Pediatr Cardiol; 2014 Feb; 35(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 23963186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction of fluid responsiveness using a non-invasive cardiac output monitor in children undergoing cardiac surgery.
    Lee JH; No HJ; Song IK; Kim HS; Kim CS; Kim JT
    Br J Anaesth; 2015 Jul; 115(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 25926311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Uncalibrated pulse contour-derived stroke volume variation predicts fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing liver transplantation.
    Biais M; Nouette-Gaulain K; Cottenceau V; Revel P; Sztark F
    Br J Anaesth; 2008 Dec; 101(6):761-8. PubMed ID: 18852114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation are good predictors of fluid responsiveness in sepsis patients].
    Drvar Z; Pavlek M; Drvar V; Tomasević B; Baronica R; Perić M
    Acta Med Croatica; 2013 Dec; 67(5):407-14. PubMed ID: 24979881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of an automated respiratory systolic variation test with dynamic preload indicators to predict fluid responsiveness after major surgery.
    Trepte CJ; Eichhorn V; Haas SA; Stahl K; Schmid F; Nitzschke R; Goetz AE; Reuter DA
    Br J Anaesth; 2013 Nov; 111(5):736-42. PubMed ID: 23811425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Identification of volume parameters monitored with a noninvasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor for predicting fluid responsiveness in children after congenital heart disease surgery.
    Cheng YW; Xu F; Li J
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Sep; 97(39):e12289. PubMed ID: 30278500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of stroke volume variation compared with pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients undergoing major surgery.
    Zimmermann M; Feibicke T; Keyl C; Prasser C; Moritz S; Graf BM; Wiesenack C
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jun; 27(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 20035228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The prediction value of noninvasive bioreactance-based passive leg raising test in assessing fluid responsiveness in elderly patients with sepsis].
    Tong H; Hu C; Hao X; Cai G; Rao Q; Yan M; Chen J; Yan J
    Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Feb; 54(2):130-3. PubMed ID: 25907844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of stroke volume variation and pulse pressure variation to predict fluid responsiveness in patients with thoracic kyphosis.
    Chen Y; Guo X; Fu J; Dong T; Liu X; Lv H
    Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Jul; 10(7):7571-7578. PubMed ID: 34154341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Clinical observation of non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor combined passive leg raising test in predicting the children volume responsiveness].
    Wu Y; Liu X; Li C; He Y; Yang W; Yang Y; Ma W; Fu K
    Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2014 Jan; 26(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 24506855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimizing fluid therapy in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery by on-line monitoring of left ventricular stroke volume variations. Comparison with aortic systolic pressure variations.
    Reuter DA; Felbinger TW; Kilger E; Schmidt C; Lamm P; Goetz AE
    Br J Anaesth; 2002 Jan; 88(1):124-6. PubMed ID: 11881866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stroke volume variation and pleth variability index to predict fluid responsiveness during resection of primary retroperitoneal tumors in Hans Chinese.
    Fu Q; Mi WD; Zhang H
    Biosci Trends; 2012 Feb; 6(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 22426102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of stroke volume and fluid responsiveness measurements in commonly used technologies for goal-directed therapy.
    Davies SJ; Minhas S; Wilson RJ; Yates D; Howell SJ
    J Clin Anesth; 2013 Sep; 25(6):466-74. PubMed ID: 23965199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Stroke volume variation fail to predict fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy with one-lung ventilation using thoracotomy.
    Fu Q; Zhao F; Mi W; Zhang H
    Biosci Trends; 2014 Feb; 8(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 24647114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ability of stroke volume variation measured by oesophageal Doppler monitoring to predict fluid responsiveness during surgery.
    Guinot PG; de Broca B; Abou Arab O; Diouf M; Badoux L; Bernard E; Lorne E; Dupont H
    Br J Anaesth; 2013 Jan; 110(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 22918700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Non-invasive measurements of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in anesthetized patients using the Nexfin blood pressure monitor.
    Stens J; Oeben J; Van Dusseldorp AA; Boer C
    J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26318314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of tidal volume on left ventricular stroke volume variation measured by pulse contour analysis in mechanically ventilated patients.
    Reuter DA; Bayerlein J; Goepfert MS; Weis FC; Kilger E; Lamm P; Goetz AE
    Intensive Care Med; 2003 Mar; 29(3):476-80. PubMed ID: 12579420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Noninvasive pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness at multiple thresholds: a prospective observational study.
    Vos JJ; Poterman M; Salm PP; Van Amsterdam K; Struys MM; Scheeren TW; Kalmar AF
    Can J Anaesth; 2015 Nov; 62(11):1153-60. PubMed ID: 26335905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The ability of pulse pressure variations obtained with CNAP™ device to predict fluid responsiveness in the operating room.
    Biais M; Stecken L; Ottolenghi L; Roullet S; Quinart A; Masson F; Sztark F
    Anesth Analg; 2011 Sep; 113(3):523-8. PubMed ID: 21642606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.