162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25315995)
1. Improving the accuracy of genomic prediction in Chinese Holstein cattle by using one-step blending.
Li X; Wang S; Huang J; Li L; Zhang Q; Ding X
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):66. PubMed ID: 25315995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison on genomic predictions using three GBLUP methods and two single-step blending methods in the Nordic Holstein population.
Gao H; Christensen OF; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Zhang Y; Lund MS; Su G
Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Jul; 44(1):8. PubMed ID: 22455934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Short communication: Single-step genomic evaluation of milk production traits using multiple-trait random regression model in Chinese Holsteins.
Kang H; Ning C; Zhou L; Zhang S; Yan Q; Liu JF
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Dec; 101(12):11143-11149. PubMed ID: 30268613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of genomic prediction for milk production traits in the Chinese Holstein population using a reference population consisting of cows.
Ding X; Zhang Z; Li X; Wang S; Wu X; Sun D; Yu Y; Liu J; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Zhang S; Zhang Y; Zhang Q
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Aug; 96(8):5315-23. PubMed ID: 23746588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimizing genomic prediction for Australian Red dairy cattle.
van den Berg I; MacLeod IM; Reich CM; Breen EJ; Pryce JE
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jul; 103(7):6276-6298. PubMed ID: 32331891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Genomic prediction for Nordic Red Cattle using one-step and selection index blending.
Su G; Madsen P; Nielsen US; Mäntysaari EA; Aamand GP; Christensen OF; Lund MS
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Feb; 95(2):909-17. PubMed ID: 22281355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improved precision of QTL mapping using a nonlinear Bayesian method in a multi-breed population leads to greater accuracy of across-breed genomic predictions.
Kemper KE; Reich CM; Bowman PJ; Vander Jagt CJ; Chamberlain AJ; Mason BA; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):29. PubMed ID: 25887988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genomic prediction of genetic merit using LD-based haplotypes in the Nordic Holstein population.
Cuyabano BC; Su G; Lund MS
BMC Genomics; 2014 Dec; 15(1):1171. PubMed ID: 25539631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Including overseas performance information in genomic evaluations of Australian dairy cattle.
Haile-Mariam M; Pryce JE; Schrooten C; Hayes BJ
J Dairy Sci; 2015 May; 98(5):3443-59. PubMed ID: 25771052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single-step genomic evaluation of Russian dairy cattle using internal and external information.
Kudinov AA; Mäntysaari EA; Pitkänen TJ; Saksa EI; Aamand GP; Uimari P; Strandén I
J Anim Breed Genet; 2022 May; 139(3):259-270. PubMed ID: 34841597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genomic selection for tolerance to heat stress in Australian dairy cattle.
Nguyen TTT; Bowman PJ; Haile-Mariam M; Pryce JE; Hayes BJ
J Dairy Sci; 2016 Apr; 99(4):2849-2862. PubMed ID: 27037467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of genotyped cows in the reference population on the genomic evaluation of Holstein cattle.
Uemoto Y; Osawa T; Saburi J
Animal; 2017 Mar; 11(3):382-393. PubMed ID: 27515004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of genomic prediction for milk fatty acid composition by using a multi-population reference and incorporating GWAS results.
Gebreyesus G; Bovenhuis H; Lund MS; Poulsen NA; Sun D; Buitenhuis B
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Apr; 51(1):16. PubMed ID: 31029078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracies of breeding values for dry matter intake using nongenotyped animals and predictor traits in different lactations.
Manzanilla-Pech CIV; Veerkamp RF; de Haas Y; Calus MPL; Ten Napel J
J Dairy Sci; 2017 Nov; 100(11):9103-9114. PubMed ID: 28865857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Exploring the genetic architecture and improving genomic prediction accuracy for mastitis and milk production traits in dairy cattle by mapping variants to hepatic transcriptomic regions responsive to intra-mammary infection.
Fang L; Sahana G; Ma P; Su G; Yu Y; Zhang S; Lund MS; Sørensen P
Genet Sel Evol; 2017 May; 49(1):44. PubMed ID: 28499345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single-step genomic model improved reliability and reduced the bias of genomic predictions in Danish Jersey.
Ma P; Lund MS; Nielsen US; Aamand GP; Su G
J Dairy Sci; 2015 Dec; 98(12):9026-34. PubMed ID: 26433415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validating genomic prediction for nitrogen efficiency index and its composition traits of Holstein cows in early lactation.
Chen Y; Atashi H; Mota RR; Grelet C; Vanderick S; Hu H; ; Gengler N
J Anim Breed Genet; 2023 Nov; 140(6):695-706. PubMed ID: 37571877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multitrait genomic prediction of methane emissions in Danish Holstein cattle.
Manzanilla-Pech CIV; Gordo D; Difford GF; Løvendahl P; Lassen J
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Oct; 103(10):9195-9206. PubMed ID: 32747097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Genomic prediction of residual feed intake in US Holstein dairy cattle.
Li B; VanRaden PM; Guduk E; O'Connell JR; Null DJ; Connor EE; VandeHaar MJ; Tempelman RJ; Weigel KA; Cole JB
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Mar; 103(3):2477-2486. PubMed ID: 31954583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
