These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25316057)
1. Exact monitoring of aortic diameters in Marfan patients without gadolinium contrast: intraindividual comparison of 2D SSFP imaging with 3D CE-MRA and echocardiography. Veldhoen S; Behzadi C; Derlin T; Rybczinsky M; von Kodolitsch Y; Sheikhzadeh S; Henes FO; Bley TA; Adam G; Bannas P Eur Radiol; 2015 Mar; 25(3):872-82. PubMed ID: 25316057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of thoracic aortic dimensions on ECG-triggered SSFP as alternative to contrast-enhanced MRA. Snel GJH; Hernandez LM; Slart RHJA; Nguyen CT; Sosnovik DE; van Deursen VM; Dierckx RAJO; Velthuis BK; Borra RJH; Prakken NHJ Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):5794-5804. PubMed ID: 32506262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliability of non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography-derived aortic diameters in Marfan patients: comparison of inner vs. outer vessel wall measurements. Weinrich JM; Avanesov M; Lenz A; Tahir E; Henes FO; Schoennagel BP; Rybczinsky M; Adam G; von Kodolitsch Y; Bannas P Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Aug; 36(8):1533-1542. PubMed ID: 32314122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of aortic diameter in Marfan patients: intraindividual comparison of 3D-Dixon and 2D-SSFP magnetic resonance imaging. Wright F; Warncke M; Sinn M; Ristow I; Lenz A; Riedel C; Schoennagel BP; Zhang S; Kaul MG; Adam G; von Kodolitsch Y; Sehner S; Bannas P Eur Radiol; 2023 Mar; 33(3):1687-1697. PubMed ID: 36269370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced SSFP MR angiography compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR angiography for the assessment of thoracic aortic diseases. Krishnam MS; Tomasian A; Malik S; Desphande V; Laub G; Ruehm SG Eur Radiol; 2010 Jun; 20(6):1311-20. PubMed ID: 20013276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measuring aortic diameter with different MR techniques: comparison of three-dimensional (3D) navigated steady-state free-precession (SSFP), 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA), 2D T2 black blood, and 2D cine SSFP. Potthast S; Mitsumori L; Stanescu LA; Richardson ML; Branch K; Dubinsky TJ; Maki JH J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jan; 31(1):177-84. PubMed ID: 20027585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of native high-resolution 3D and contrast-enhanced MR angiography for assessing the thoracic aorta. von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F; Gruettner H; Trauzeddel RF; Greiser A; Schulz-Menger J Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jun; 15(6):651-8. PubMed ID: 24399340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of a novel Compressed SENSE accelerated 3D modified relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering with CE-MRA in imaging of the thoracic aorta. Pennig L; Wagner A; Weiss K; Lennartz S; Huntgeburth M; Hickethier T; Maintz D; Naehle CP; Bunck AC; Doerner J Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Jan; 37(1):315-329. PubMed ID: 32852711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ECG-gated MR angiography provides better reproducibility for standard aortic measurements. Smith LR; Darty SN; Jenista ER; Gamoneda GL; Wendell DC; Azevedo CF; Parker MA; Kim RJ; Kim HW Eur Radiol; 2021 Jul; 31(7):5087-5095. PubMed ID: 33409772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Noncontrast 3D steady-state free-precession magnetic resonance angiography of the whole chest using nonselective radiofrequency excitation over a large field of view: comparison with single-phase 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Krishnam MS; Tomasian A; Deshpande V; Tran L; Laub G; Finn JP; Ruehm SG Invest Radiol; 2008 Jun; 43(6):411-20. PubMed ID: 18496046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. MR-imaging of the thoracic aorta: 3D-ECG- and respiratory-gated bSSFP imaging using the CLAWS algorithm versus contrast-enhanced 3D-MRA. Kawel N; Jhooti P; Dashti D; Haas T; Winter L; Zellweger MJ; Buser PT; Keegan J; Scheffler K; Bremerich J Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):239-43. PubMed ID: 21237595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of aortic root dimensions in patients with suspected Marfan syndrome: intraindividual comparison of contrast-enhanced and non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography with echocardiography. Bannas P; Groth M; Rybczynski M; Sheikhzadeh S; von Kodolitsch Y; Graessner J; Lund G; Adam G; Habermann CR Int J Cardiol; 2013 Jul; 167(1):190-6. PubMed ID: 22240770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraindividual assessment of the thoracic aorta using contrast and non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography. von Tengg-Kobligk H; Ley-Zaporozhan J; Henninger V; Grünberg KM; Giesel FL; Böckler D; Krummenauer F; Kauczor HU; Ley S Rofo; 2009 Mar; 181(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 19229788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Unenhanced MR angiography of the thoracic aorta: initial clinical evaluation. François CJ; Tuite D; Deshpande V; Jerecic R; Weale P; Carr JC AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Apr; 190(4):902-6. PubMed ID: 18356435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Noncontrast 3D steady state free precession magnetic resonance angiography of the thoracic central veins using nonselective radiofrequency excitation over a large field of view: initial experience. Tomasian A; Lohan DG; Laub G; Singhal A; Finn JP; Krishnam MS Invest Radiol; 2008 May; 43(5):306-13. PubMed ID: 18424951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Thoracic aorta diameters in Marfan patients: Intraindividual comparison of 3D modified relaxation-enhanced angiography without contrast and triggering (REACT) with transthoracic echocardiography. Gietzen C; Pennig L; von Stein J; Guthoff H; Weiss K; Gertz R; Thürbach I; Bunck AC; Maintz D; Baldus S; Ten Freyhaus H; Hohmann C; von Stein P Int J Cardiol; 2023 Nov; 390():131203. PubMed ID: 37480997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radial self-navigated native magnetic resonance angiography in comparison to navigator-gated contrast-enhanced MRA of the entire thoracic aorta in an aortic patient collective. Correa Londono M; Trussardi N; Obmann VC; Piccini D; Ith M; von Tengg-Kobligk H; Jung B J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2021 Jul; 23(1):94. PubMed ID: 34247640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Non-gadolinium-enhanced 3-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of thoracic aortic disease: a preliminary experience. Srichai MB; Kim S; Axel L; Babb J; Hecht EM Tex Heart Inst J; 2010; 37(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 20200628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraindividual comparison of 1.5 T and 3 T non-contrast MR angiography for monitoring of aortic root diameters in Marfan patients. Avanesov M; Weinrich JM; Sinn M; Lenz A; von Düring F; Salamon J; Henes FO; Schönnagel BP; Adam G; von Kodolitsch Y; Bannas P Int J Cardiol; 2021 Aug; 337():119-126. PubMed ID: 33933510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Non-contrast enhanced navigator-gated balanced steady state free precession magnetic resonance angiography as a preferred magnetic resonance technique for assessment of the thoracic aorta. van Kesteren F; Elattar MA; van Lienden KP; Baan J; Marquering HA; Planken RN Clin Radiol; 2017 Aug; 72(8):695.e1-695.e6. PubMed ID: 28388971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]