317 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25316160)
1. Accuracy of genomic prediction for growth and carcass traits in Chinese triple-yellow chickens.
Liu T; Qu H; Luo C; Shu D; Wang J; Lund MS; Su G
BMC Genet; 2014 Oct; 15():110. PubMed ID: 25316160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of the genomic prediction accuracy for feed efficiency traits in meat-type chickens.
Liu T; Luo C; Wang J; Ma J; Shu D; Lund MS; Su G; Qu H
PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173620. PubMed ID: 28278209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of fitting dominance and additive effects on accuracy of genomic prediction of breeding values in layers.
Heidaritabar M; Wolc A; Arango J; Zeng J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Bastiaansen JW; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC
J Anim Breed Genet; 2016 Oct; 133(5):334-46. PubMed ID: 27357473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genomic prediction ability for feed efficiency traits using different models and pseudo-phenotypes under several validation strategies in Nelore cattle.
Brunes LC; Baldi F; Lopes FB; Narciso MG; Lobo RB; Espigolan R; Costa MFO; Magnabosco CU
Animal; 2021 Feb; 15(2):100085. PubMed ID: 33573965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of Igenity genomically estimated breeding values for predicting Australian Angus BREEDPLAN traits.
Boerner V; Johnston D; Wu XL; Bauck S
J Anim Sci; 2015 Feb; 93(2):513-21. PubMed ID: 25549982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genomic evaluation of carcass traits of Korean beef cattle Hanwoo using a single-step marker effect model.
Koo Y; Alkhoder H; Choi TJ; Liu Z; Reents R
J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 37004242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of genomic predictions for harvest and carcass weight in channel catfish.
Garcia ALS; Bosworth B; Waldbieser G; Misztal I; Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL
Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):66. PubMed ID: 30547740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of pedigree and genomic predictions of carcass and novel meat quality traits in multi-breed sheep data assessed by cross-validation.
Daetwyler HD; Swan AA; van der Werf JH; Hayes BJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Nov; 44(1):33. PubMed ID: 23146144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of conventional BLUP and single-step genomic BLUP evaluations for yearling weight and carcass traits in Hanwoo beef cattle using single trait and multi-trait models.
Mehrban H; Lee DH; Naserkheil M; Moradi MH; Ibáñez-Escriche N
PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0223352. PubMed ID: 31609979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Whole genomic prediction of growth and carcass traits in a Chinese quality chicken population.
Zhang Z; Xu ZQ; Luo YY; Zhang HB; Gao N; He JL; Ji CL; Zhang DX; Li JQ; Zhang XQ
J Anim Sci; 2017 Jan; 95(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 28177394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genomic dissection and prediction of feed intake and residual feed intake traits using a longitudinal model in F2 chickens.
Emamgholi Begli H; Vaez Torshizi R; Masoudi AA; Ehsani A; Jensen J
Animal; 2018 Sep; 12(9):1792-1798. PubMed ID: 29268803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of genomic predictions using genomic relationship matrices built with different weighting factors to account for locus-specific variances.
Su G; Christensen OF; Janss L; Lund MS
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Oct; 97(10):6547-59. PubMed ID: 25129495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of genomic information to exploit genotype-by-environment interactions for body weight of broiler chicken in bio-secure and production environments.
Chu TT; Bastiaansen JWM; Berg P; Romé H; Marois D; Henshall J; Jensen J
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Sep; 51(1):50. PubMed ID: 31533614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genomic prediction based on data from three layer lines: a comparison between linear methods.
Calus MP; Huang H; Vereijken A; Visscher J; Ten Napel J; Windig JJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Oct; 46(1):57. PubMed ID: 25927219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genome-enabled prediction of meat and carcass traits using Bayesian regression, single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction and blending methods in Nelore cattle.
Lopes FB; Baldi F; Passafaro TL; Brunes LC; Costa MFO; Eifert EC; Narciso MG; Rosa GJM; Lobo RB; Magnabosco CU
Animal; 2021 Jan; 15(1):100006. PubMed ID: 33516009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of genomic breeding values and their accuracies for carcass traits in Jeju Black cattle using whole-genome SNP chip panels.
Haque MA; Iqbal A; Bae H; Lee SE; Park S; Lee YM; Kim JJ
J Anim Breed Genet; 2023 Sep; 140(5):519-531. PubMed ID: 37102238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of genomic predictions for body weight in broilers using crossbred information and considering breed-of-origin of alleles.
Duenk P; Calus MPL; Wientjes YCJ; Breen VP; Henshall JM; Hawken R; Bijma P
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Jul; 51(1):38. PubMed ID: 31286857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multitrait genomic prediction of methane emissions in Danish Holstein cattle.
Manzanilla-Pech CIV; Gordo D; Difford GF; Løvendahl P; Lassen J
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Oct; 103(10):9195-9206. PubMed ID: 32747097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for carcass merit traits in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.
Chen L; Vinsky M; Li C
Anim Genet; 2015 Feb; 46(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 25393962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
